RANS-based aerodynamic shape optimization investigations of the common research modelwing

The aerodynamic shape optimization of transonic wings requires Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) modeling due to the strong nonlinear coupling between airfoil shape, wave drag, and viscous effects. While there has been some research dedicated to RANS-based aerodynamic shape optimization, there has not been an benchmark case for researchers to compare their results. In this investigations, a series of aerodynamic shape optimizations of the Common Research Model wing defined for the Aerodynamic Design Optimization Workshop are presented. The computational fluid dynamics solves Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes equations with a Spalart–Allmaras turbulence model. A gradient-based optimization algorithm is used in conjunction with a discrete adjoint method that computes the derivatives of the aerodynamic forces. The drag coefficient at the nominal flight condition is minimized subject to lift, pitching moment and geometric constraints. A multilevel acceleration technique is used to reduce the computational cost. A total of 768 shape design variables are considered, together with a grid with 28.8 million cells. The drag coefficient of the optimized wing is reduced by 8.5% relative to the baseline. The single-point design has a sharp leading edge that is prone to flow separation at off-design conditions. A more robust design is achieved through a multipoint optimization, which achieves more reliable performance when lift coefficient and Mach number are varied about the nominal flight condition. To test the design space for local minima, randomly generated initial geometries are optimized, and a flat design space with multiple local minima was observed.

[1]  Joaquim R. R. A. Martins,et al.  Aerodynamic Shape Optimization of an Adaptive Morphing Trailing-Edge Wing , 2015 .

[2]  D. Zingg,et al.  Multimodality and Global Optimization in Aerodynamic Design , 2013 .

[3]  Matthew G. Knepley,et al.  PETSc Users Manual (Rev. 3.4) , 2014 .

[4]  Joaquim R. R. A. Martins,et al.  Multipoint High-Fidelity Aerostructural Optimization of a Transport Aircraft Configuration , 2014 .

[5]  C. Mader,et al.  Stability-Constrained Aerodynamic Shape Optimization of Flying Wings , 2013 .

[6]  Graeme J. Kennedy,et al.  Scalable Parallel Approach for High-Fidelity Steady-State Aeroelastic Analysis and Adjoint Derivative Computations , 2014 .

[7]  Joaquim R. R. A. Martins,et al.  Aerodynamic Shape Optimization of Common Research Model Wing–Body–Tail Configuration , 2016 .

[8]  John C. Vassberg,et al.  Gradient-Based Single and Multi-points Aerodynamic Optimizations with the elsA Software , 2015 .

[9]  Joaquim R. R. A. Martins,et al.  A CAD-Free Approach to High-Fidelity Aerostructural Optimization , 2010 .

[10]  Cody A. Paige,et al.  Automatic Differentiation Adjoint of the Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes Equations with a Turbulence Model , 2013 .

[11]  Joaquim R. R. A. Martins,et al.  Multi-point, multi-mission, high-fidelity aerostructural optimization of a long-range aircraft configuration , 2012 .

[12]  Joaquim R. R. A. Martins,et al.  Multimission Aircraft Fuel-Burn Minimization via Multipoint Aerostructural Optimization , 2015 .

[13]  Joaquim R. R. A. Martins,et al.  pyOpt: a Python-based object-oriented framework for nonlinear constrained optimization , 2011, Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization.

[14]  John T. Hwang,et al.  Review and Unification of Methods for Computing Derivatives of Multidisciplinary Computational Models , 2013 .

[15]  T. Pulliam,et al.  Aerodynamic Shape Optimization Using A Real-Number-Encoded Genetic Algorithm , 2001 .

[16]  Antony Jameson,et al.  Aerodynamic design via control theory , 1988, J. Sci. Comput..

[17]  William Gropp,et al.  Efficient Management of Parallelism in Object-Oriented Numerical Software Libraries , 1997, SciTools.

[18]  Joaquim R. R. A. Martins,et al.  RANS-based Aerodynamic Shape Optimization of a Blended-Wing-Body Aircraft , 2013 .

[19]  M. J. Rimlinger,et al.  Constrained Multipoint Aerodynamic Shape Optimization Using an Adjoint Formulation and Parallel Computers , 1997 .

[20]  M. J. Rimlinger,et al.  Constrained Multipoint Aerodynamic Shape Optimization Using an Adjoint Formulation and Parallel Computers , 1997 .

[21]  Hans Petter Langtangen,et al.  Modern Software Tools for Scientific Computing , 1997, Birkhäuser Boston.

[22]  Joaquim R. R. A. Martins,et al.  Aerodynamic Shape Optimization of a Blended-Wing-Body Aircraft , 2013 .

[23]  D. P. Young,et al.  Study Based on the AIAA Aerodynamic Design Optimization Discussion Group Test Cases , 2015 .

[24]  Joaquim R. R. A. Martins,et al.  Aerodynamic Shape Optimization Investigations of the Common Research Model Wing Benchmark , 2015 .

[25]  T. Pulliam,et al.  Multipoint and Multi-Objective Aerodynamic Shape Optimization , 2002 .

[26]  Egbert Torenbeek,et al.  The New Textbook ”Advanced Aircraft Design – Conceptual Design, Technology and Optimization of Subsonic Civil Airplanes“ , 2013 .

[27]  Michael A. Saunders,et al.  SNOPT: An SQP Algorithm for Large-Scale Constrained Optimization , 2002, SIAM J. Optim..

[28]  Georgi Kalitzin,et al.  Unsteady turbomachinery computations using massively parallel platforms , 2006 .

[29]  Y. Saad,et al.  GMRES: a generalized minimal residual algorithm for solving nonsymmetric linear systems , 1986 .

[30]  A. Jameson,et al.  Numerical solution of the Euler equations by finite volume methods using Runge Kutta time stepping schemes , 1981 .

[31]  Kazuhiro Nakahashi,et al.  Aerodynamic Shape Optimization of Supersonic Wings by Adaptive Range Multiobjective Genetic Algorithms , 2001, EMO.

[32]  Daniel J Poole,et al.  Control Point-Based Aerodynamic Shape Optimization Applied to AIAA ADODG Test Cases , 2015 .