Social networks and physician adoption of electronic health records: insights from an empirical study

OBJECTIVE To study how social interactions influence physician adoption of an electronic health records (EHR) system. DESIGN A social network survey was used to delineate the structure of social interactions among 40 residents and 15 attending physicians in an ambulatory primary care practice. Social network analysis was then applied to relate the interaction structures to individual physicians' utilization rates of an EHR system. MEASUREMENTS The social network survey assessed three distinct types of interaction structures: professional network based on consultation on patient care-related matters; friendship network based on personal intimacy; and perceived influence network based on a person's perception of how other people have affected her intention to adopt the EHR system. EHR utilization rates were measured as the proportion of patient visits in which sentinel use events consisting of patient data documentation or retrieval activities were recorded. The usage data were collected over a time period of 14 months from computer-recorded audit trail logs. RESULTS Neither the professional nor the perceived influence network is correlated with EHR usage. The structure of the friendship network significantly influenced individual physicians' adoption of the EHR system. Residents who occupied similar social positions in the friendship network shared similar EHR utilization rates (p<0.05). In other words, residents who had personal friends in common tended to develop comparable levels of EHR adoption. This effect is particularly prominent when the mutual personal friends of these 'socially similar' residents were attending physicians (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS Social influence affecting physician adoption of EHR seems to be predominantly conveyed through interactions with personal friends rather than interactions in professional settings.

[1]  Kai Zheng,et al.  Research Article: An Interface-driven Analysis of User Interactions with an Electronic Health Records System , 2009, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[2]  R. Merton.  Social Theory and Social Structure , 1958 .

[3]  D. Gifford,et al.  Curbside consultation practices and attitudes among primary care physicians and medical subspecialists. , 1998, JAMA.

[4]  Yasar A Ozcan,et al.  Do Hospitals With Electronic Medical Records (EMRs) Provide Higher Quality Care? , 2008, Medical care research and review : MCRR.

[5]  George Hripcsak,et al.  Case Report: Using Social Network Analysis within a Department of Biomedical Informatics to Induce a Discussion of Academic Communities of Practice , 2008, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[6]  Icek Ajzen,et al.  From Intentions to Actions: A Theory of Planned Behavior , 1985 .

[7]  J Gabbay,et al.  Understanding the role of opinion leaders in improving clinical effectiveness. , 2001, Social science & medicine.

[8]  N. Keating,et al.  Factors Affecting Influential Discussions Among Physicians: A Social Network Analysis of a Primary Care Practice , 2007, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[9]  Ritu Agarwal,et al.  The Role of Innovation Characteristics and Perceived Voluntariness in the Acceptance of Information Technologies , 1997 .

[10]  Jonathan P. West,et al.  Workplace Relations: Friendship Patterns and Consequences (According to Managers) , 2002 .

[11]  T. Abel,et al.  Mind, Self, and Society , 1934 .

[12]  Michael D. Robinson,et al.  Belief and feeling: evidence for an accessibility model of emotional self-report. , 2002, Psychological bulletin.

[13]  Stanley Wasserman,et al.  Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications , 1994, Structural analysis in the social sciences.

[14]  C. Delpierre,et al.  A systematic review of computer-based patient record systems and quality of care: more randomized clinical trials or a broader approach? , 2004, International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.

[15]  S J Jay,et al.  Computers and clinical judgment: the role of physician networks. , 1985, Social science & medicine.

[16]  Deborah E. Gibbons,et al.  Friendship and Advice Networks in the Context of Changing Professional Values , 2004 .

[17]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Testing the technology acceptance model across cultures: A three country study , 1997, Inf. Manag..

[18]  Marcia M Ward,et al.  The Relationship Between Super Users' Attitudes and Employee Experiences With Clinical Information Systems , 2009, Medical care research and review : MCRR.

[19]  S. D. Berkowitz,et al.  Social Structures: A Network Approach , 1989 .

[20]  Andrew Georgiou,et al.  Model Formulation: Multimethod Evaluation of Information and Communication Technologies in Health in the Context of Wicked Problems and Sociotechnical Theory , 2007, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[21]  Marlene E. Burkhardt,et al.  SOCIAL INTERACTION EFFECTS FOLLOWING A TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGE: A LONGITUDINAL INVESTIGATION , 1994 .

[22]  Marie-Pierre Gagnon,et al.  An adaptation of the theory of interpersonal behaviour to the study of telemedicine adoption by physicians , 2003, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[23]  Fred D. Davis.  Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[24]  Charles P. Friedman,et al.  Development and initial validation of an instrument to measure physicians' use of, knowledge about, and attitudes toward computers. , 1998, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA.

[25]  Y. Han,et al.  Unexpected Increased Mortality After Implementation of a Commercially Sold Computerized Physician Order Entry System , 2005, Pediatrics.

[26]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Why Don't Men Ever Stop to Ask for Directions? Gender, Social Influence, and Their Role in Technology Acceptance and Usage Behavior , 2000, MIS Q..

[27]  John G. Scott,et al.  Social Network Analysis as an Analytic Tool for Interaction Patterns in Primary Care Practices , 2005, The Annals of Family Medicine.

[28]  H. Blumer,et al.  Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method , 1988 .

[29]  P. Bonacich.  Factoring and weighting approaches to status scores and clique identification , 1972 .

[30]  Nigel Edwards,et al.  Unhappy doctors: what are the causes and what can be done? , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[31]  P. Doreian.  Linear Models with Spatially Distributed Data , 1980 .

[32]  Louise Fitzgerald,et al.  Getting Evidence into Clinical Practice: An Organisational Behaviour Perspective , 2000, Journal of health services research & policy.

[33]  Nancy G. Boyd,et al.  A developmental approach to the examination of friendship in leader-follower relationships , 1998 .

[34]  Sonja Wiley-Patton,et al.  Test of the technology acceptance model for the internet in pediatrics , 2002, AMIA.

[35]  Bonnie Kaplan,et al.  Evaluating informatics applications - some alternative approaches: theory, social interactionism, and call for methodological pluralism , 2001, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[36]  D. Gifford,et al.  Improving Adherence to Dementia Guidelines through Education and Opinion Leaders , 1999, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[37]  J. Coleman,et al.  Medical Innovation: A Diffusion Study. , 1967 .

[38]  Leonard M. Freeman,et al.  A set of measures of centrality based upon betweenness , 1977 .

[39]  N. Christakis,et al.  Dynamic spread of happiness in a large social network: longitudinal analysis over 20 years in the Framingham Heart Study , 2008, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[40]  Zhiping Walter,et al.  Theory of user acceptance of information technologies: an examination of health care professionals , 1999, Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences. 1999. HICSS-32. Abstracts and CD-ROM of Full Papers.

[41]  R. Burt.  Social Contagion and Innovation: Cohesion versus Structural Equivalence , 1987, American Journal of Sociology.

[42]  Ronald S. Burt,et al.  Cohesion Versus Structural Equivalence as a Basis for Network Subgroups , 1978 .

[43]  Kai Zheng,et al.  Evaluation of Healthcare IT Applications: The User Acceptance Perspective , 2007, Advanced Computational Intelligence Paradigms in Healthcare - 2.

[44]  N. Christakis,et al.  SUPPLEMENTARY ONLINE MATERIAL FOR: The Collective Dynamics of Smoking in a Large Social Network , 2022 .

[45]  Li-Min Lin,et al.  Testing the technology acceptance model for evaluating healthcare professionals' intention to use an adverse event reporting system. , 2007, International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.

[46]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research , 1977 .

[47]  G. Homans.  The human group , 1952 .

[48]  Kai Zheng,et al.  An Adoption Study of a Clinical Reminder System in Ambulatory Care Using A Developmental Trajectory Approach , 2004, MedInfo.

[49]  P C W Beatty,et al.  Anaesthetists' intentions to violate safety guidelines , 2004, Anaesthesia.

[50]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[51]  V. Venkatesh,et al.  AGE DIFFERENCES IN TECHNOLOGY ADOPTION DECISIONS: IMPLICATIONS FOR A CHANGING WORK FORCE , 2000 .

[52]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies , 2000, Management Science.

[53]  Roger Th. A. J. Leenders,et al.  Modeling social influence through network autocorrelation: constructing the weight matrix , 2002, Soc. Networks.

[54]  Richard P. Bagozzi,et al.  A Reasoned Action Approach to Physicians' Utilization of Drug Information Sources , 1996, Pharmaceutical Research.

[55]  L. Rips,et al.  Answering autobiographical questions: the impact of memory and inference on surveys. , 1987, Science.

[56]  R. Merton.  The unanticipated consequences of purposive social action , 1936 .

[57]  Henri Barki,et al.  Measuring User Participation, User Involvement, and User Attitude , 1994, MIS Q..

[58]  N. Christakis,et al.  The Spread of Obesity in a Large Social Network Over 32 Years , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[59]  Paul Jen-Hwa Hu,et al.  Information Technology Acceptance by Individual Professionals: A Model Comparison Approach , 2001, Decis. Sci..

[60]  R. Rice,et al.  Attitudes toward New Organizational Technology: Network Proximity as a Mechanism for Social Information Processing. , 1991 .

[61]  David Krackhardt,et al.  PREDICTING WITH NETWORKS: NONPARAMETRIC MULTIPLE REGRESSION ANALYSIS OF DYADIC DATA * , 1988 .

[62]  T. Valente.  Opinion leader interventions in social networks , 2006, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[63]  Joan S. Ash,et al.  Implementing computerized physician order entry: the importance of special people , 2003, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[64]  P. Shah.  Network Destruction: The Structural Implications of Downsizing , 2000 .

[65]  P. Arabie,et al.  An algorithm for clustering relational data with applications to social network analysis and comparison with multidimensional scaling , 1975 .