Gene‐environment interaction tests for dichotomous traits in trios and sibships

When testing for genetic effects, failure to account for a gene‐environment interaction can mask the true association effects of a genetic marker with disease. Family‐based association tests are popular because they are completely robust to population substructure and model misspecification. However, when testing for an interaction, failure to model the main genetic effect correctly can lead to spurious results. Here we propose a family‐based test for interaction that is robust to model misspecification, but still sensitive to an interaction effect, and can handle continuous covariates and missing parents. We extend the FBAT‐I gene‐environment interaction test for dichotomous traits to using both trios and sibships. We then compare this extension to joint tests of gene and gene‐environment interaction, and compare the joint test additionally to the main effects test of the gene. Lastly, we apply these three tests to a group of nuclear families ascertained according to affection with Bipolar Disorder. Genet. Epidemiol. 33:691–699, 2009. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  Christoph Lange,et al.  Testing and Estimating Gene–Environment Interactions in Family‐Based Association Studies , 2008, Biometrics.

[2]  J. Witte,et al.  Asymptotic bias and efficiency in case-control studies of candidate genes and gene-environment interactions: basic family designs. , 1999, American journal of epidemiology.

[3]  Peter Kraft,et al.  Exploiting Gene-Environment Interaction to Detect Genetic Associations , 2007, Human Heredity.

[4]  R Plomin,et al.  Gene–environment interaction analysis of serotonin system markers with adolescent depression , 2004, Molecular Psychiatry.

[5]  S. Moldin,et al.  NIMH Human Genetics Initiative: 2003 update. , 2003, The American journal of psychiatry.

[6]  Christoph Lange,et al.  P2BAT: a massive parallel implementation of PBAT for genome-wide association studies in R , 2006, Bioinform..

[7]  Raymond J Carroll,et al.  Exploiting gene‐environment independence in family‐based case‐control studies: Increased power for detecting associations, interactions and joint effects , 2005, Genetic epidemiology.

[8]  D. Clayton,et al.  A unified stepwise regression procedure for evaluating the relative effects of polymorphisms within a gene using case/control or family data: application to HLA in type 1 diabetes. , 2002, American journal of human genetics.

[9]  Daniel Rabinowitz,et al.  A Unified Approach to Adjusting Association Tests for Population Admixture with Arbitrary Pedigree Structure and Arbitrary Missing Marker Information , 2000, Human Heredity.

[10]  N. Laird,et al.  Family-based designs in the age of large-scale gene-association studies , 2006, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[11]  H. Cordell.  Epistasis: what it means, what it doesn't mean, and statistical methods to detect it in humans. , 2002, Human molecular genetics.

[12]  D. Rao,et al.  An epidemiologic approach to gene‐environment interaction , 1990, Genetic epidemiology.

[13]  Heather J Cordell,et al.  Case/pseudocontrol analysis in genetic association studies: A unified framework for detection of genotype and haplotype associations, gene‐gene and gene‐environment interactions, and parent‐of‐origin effects , 2004, Genetic epidemiology.

[14]  N M Laird,et al.  Tests of Gene‐Environment Interaction for Case‐Parent Triads with General Environmental Exposures , 2004, Annals of human genetics.

[15]  L. Kuller,et al.  Estrogen use, APOE, and cognitive decline , 2000, Neurology.

[16]  Frank Dudbridge,et al.  Likelihood-Based Association Analysis for Nuclear Families and Unrelated Subjects with Missing Genotype Data , 2008, Human Heredity.

[17]  N M Laird,et al.  Family-based tests of association and linkage that use unaffected sibs, covariates, and interactions. , 2000, American journal of human genetics.

[18]  Heather J Cordell,et al.  Properties of case/pseudocontrol analysis for genetic association studies: Effects of recombination, ascertainment, and multiple affected offspring , 2004, Genetic epidemiology.

[19]  M. Daly,et al.  Combined analysis from eleven linkage studies of bipolar disorder provides strong evidence of susceptibility loci on chromosomes 6q and 8q. , 2005, American journal of human genetics.

[20]  C R Weinberg,et al.  The use of case-parent triads to study joint effects of genotype and exposure. , 2000, American journal of human genetics.

[21]  S Greenland,et al.  Basic problems in interaction assessment. , 1993, Environmental health perspectives.