Bayesian model-scenario averaged predictions of compressor cascade flows under uncertain turbulence models

Abstract The Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) equations represent the computational workhorse for engineering design, despite their numerous flaws. Improving and quantifying the uncertainties associated with RANS models is particularly critical in view of the analysis and optimization of complex turbomachinery flows. In this work, we use Bayesian inference for assimilating data into RANS models for the following purposes: (i) updating the model closure coefficients for a class of turbomachinery flows, namely a compressor cascade; (ii) quantifying the parametric uncertainty associated with closure coefficients of RANS models and (iii) quantifying the uncertainty associated with the model structure and the choice of the calibration dataset based on an ensemble of concurrent models and calibration scenarios. Inference of the coefficients of three widely employed RANS models is carried out from high-fidelity LES data for the NACA65 V103 compressor cascade [1, 2]. Posterior probability distributions of the model coefficients are collected for various calibration scenarios, corresponding to different values of the flow angle at inlet. The Maximum A Posteriori estimates of the coefficients differ from the nominal values and depend on the scenario. A recently proposed Bayesian mixture approach, namely, Bayesian Model-Scenario Averaging (BMSA) [3, 4], is used to build a prediction model that takes into account uncertainties associated with alternative model forms and with sensitivity to the calibration scenario. Stochastic predictions are presented for the turbulent flow around the NACA65 V103 cascade at mildly and severe off-design conditions. The results show that BMSA generally yields more accurate solutions than the baseline RANS models and succeeds well in providing an estimate for the predictive uncertainty intervals, provided that a sufficient diversity of scenarios and models is included in the mixture.

[1]  Karthik Duraisamy,et al.  A paradigm for data-driven predictive modeling using field inversion and machine learning , 2016, J. Comput. Phys..

[2]  V. Michelassi,et al.  Machine-Learnt Turbulence Closures for Low-Pressure Turbines With Unsteady Inflow Conditions , 2019, Journal of Turbomachinery.

[3]  Adrian E. Raftery,et al.  Bayesian model averaging: a tutorial (with comments by M. Clyde, David Draper and E. I. George, and a rejoinder by the authors , 1999 .

[4]  P. Durbin,et al.  Direct numerical simulations of transition in a compressor cascade: the influence of free-stream turbulence , 2010, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[5]  M. Yousuff Hussaini,et al.  Improving the Predictive Capability of Turbulence Models Using Evidence Theory , 2006 .

[6]  Brendan D. Tracey,et al.  Application of supervised learning to quantify uncertainties in turbulence and combustion modeling , 2013 .

[7]  Richard D. Sandberg,et al.  The Current State of High-Fidelity Simulations for Main Gas Path Turbomachinery Components and Their Industrial Impact , 2019, Flow, Turbulence and Combustion.

[8]  V. R. Joseph,et al.  Maximum projection designs for computer experiments , 2015 .

[9]  David Draper,et al.  Assessment and Propagation of Model Uncertainty , 2011 .

[10]  Sai Hung Cheung,et al.  Bayesian uncertainty analysis with applications to turbulence modeling , 2011, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[11]  Richard D. Sandberg,et al.  Detailed Investigation of RANS and LES Predictions of Loss Generation in an Axial Compressor Cascade at Off Design Incidences , 2016 .

[12]  Jorge Nocedal,et al.  Algorithm 778: L-BFGS-B: Fortran subroutines for large-scale bound-constrained optimization , 1997, TOMS.

[13]  Hester Bijl,et al.  Bayesian estimates of parameter variability in the k-ε turbulence model , 2014, J. Comput. Phys..

[14]  Eric Jones,et al.  SciPy: Open Source Scientific Tools for Python , 2001 .

[15]  Ming Ye,et al.  Combined Estimation of Hydrogeologic Conceptual Model, Parameter, and Scenario Uncertainty with Application to Uranium Transport at the Hanford Site 300 Area , 2006 .

[16]  B. Launder,et al.  Application of the energy-dissipation model of turbulence to the calculation of flow near a spinning disc , 1974 .

[17]  Laurent Cambier,et al.  The Onera elsA CFD software: input from research and feedback from industry , 2013 .

[18]  P. Malguzzi,et al.  Discharge prediction based on multi-model precipitation forecasts , 2008 .

[19]  Paola Cinnella,et al.  Bayesian Predictions of Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes Uncertainties Using Maximum a Posteriori Estimates , 2018 .

[20]  C. Papadimitriou,et al.  OPTIMAL SENSOR PLACEMENT FOR THE ESTIMATION OF TURBULENCE MODEL PARAMETERS IN CFD , 2015 .

[21]  J. Templeton,et al.  Reynolds averaged turbulence modelling using deep neural networks with embedded invariance , 2016, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[22]  D. Wilcox Turbulence modeling for CFD , 1993 .

[23]  Richard Sandberg,et al.  A novel evolutionary algorithm applied to algebraic modifications of the RANS stress-strain relationship , 2016, J. Comput. Phys..

[24]  Stavros Tavoularis,et al.  Further experiments on the evolution of turbulent stresses and scales in uniformly sheared turbulence , 1989, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[25]  Paola Cinnella,et al.  Robust prediction of dense gas flows under uncertain thermodynamic models , 2019, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[26]  S. Pope A more general effective-viscosity hypothesis , 1975, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[27]  S. Sorooshian,et al.  Multi-model ensemble hydrologic prediction using Bayesian model averaging , 2007 .

[28]  Paola Cinnella,et al.  Quantification of model uncertainty in RANS simulations: A review , 2018, Progress in Aerospace Sciences.

[29]  Reto Knutti,et al.  The use of the multi-model ensemble in probabilistic climate projections , 2007, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[30]  Pierre Sagaut,et al.  Epistemic uncertainties in RANS model free coefficients , 2014 .

[31]  David J. C. MacKay,et al.  Bayesian Interpolation , 1992, Neural Computation.

[32]  Leonhard Fottner,et al.  The Influence of Technical Surface Roughness Caused by Precision Forging on the Flow Around a Highly Loaded Compressor Cascade , 2000 .

[33]  Gaël Varoquaux,et al.  Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python , 2011, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[34]  Michael Pfitzner,et al.  Unsteady Boundary Layer Development Due to Wake Passing Effects on a Highly Loaded Linear Compressor Cascade , 2004 .

[35]  P. Spalart A One-Equation Turbulence Model for Aerodynamic Flows , 1992 .

[36]  Karthik Duraisamy,et al.  Turbulence Modeling in the Age of Data , 2018, Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics.

[37]  Pierre Sagaut,et al.  Optimal sensor placement for variational data assimilation of unsteady flows past a rotationally oscillating cylinder , 2017, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[38]  Jerome Sacks,et al.  Choosing the Sample Size of a Computer Experiment: A Practical Guide , 2009, Technometrics.

[39]  Luk Peeters,et al.  Application of a multimodel approach to account for conceptual model and scenario uncertainties in groundwater modelling , 2010 .

[40]  P. Cinnella,et al.  Predictive RANS simulations via Bayesian Model-Scenario Averaging , 2014, J. Comput. Phys..

[41]  John Geweke,et al.  Evaluating the accuracy of sampling-based approaches to the calculation of posterior moments , 1991 .

[42]  Roger G. Ghanem,et al.  Identification of Bayesian posteriors for coefficients of chaos expansions , 2010, J. Comput. Phys..

[43]  W. K. Hastings,et al.  Monte Carlo Sampling Methods Using Markov Chains and Their Applications , 1970 .