Repair for a Broken Economy: Lessons for Circular Economy from an International Interview Study of Repairers

The idea of replacing the broken linear economy with circular forms to help address the current sustainability crisis is gaining world-wide traction in policy, industry, and academia. This article presents results from an international interview study with 34 repair practitioners and experts in different fields. The article aims to improve understandings of the potential of repair so as to contribute to a more just, sustainable, and circular economy. Through a five-step qualitative method the results reveal and explore three tensions inherent in repair: first, repair activities constitute different forms of subjectivity; second, repair entails different and sometimes contested temporalities; and finally, even though repair is deeply political in practice, the politics of repair are not always explicit, and some repair activities are actively depoliticized. The opportunities and obstacles embodied in these tensions are generative in repair practices and debates, but poorly reflected in contemporary circular economy discourse. We conclude that a richer, more inclusive, and politicized understanding of repair can support environmental justice in the implementation of circular economy (CE) and provide greater opportunities for just and transformational sustainability strategies and policies.

[1]  Duncan McLaren,et al.  Reconfiguring repair: Contested politics and values of repair challenge instrumental discourses found in circular economies literature , 2020 .

[2]  R. Baumgartner,et al.  The narrative of sustainability and circular economy - A longitudinal review of two decades of research , 2020 .

[3]  M. Åkerman,et al.  Making the circular economy online: a hyperlink analysis of the articulation of nutrient recycling in Finland , 2020 .

[4]  Duncan McLaren,et al.  Local conflicts and national consensus: The strange case of circular economy in Sweden , 2020, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[5]  Ricardo J. Hernandez,et al.  Empowering Sustainable Consumption by Giving Back to Consumers the ‘Right to Repair’ , 2020, Sustainability.

[6]  A new Circular Economy Action Plan: For a cleaner and more competitive Europe , 2020 .

[7]  Jaee Nikam Transformational change through a circular economy , 2019 .

[8]  Matthew McManus The Rise of Post-Modern Conservatism: Neoliberalism, Post-Modern Culture, and Reactionary Politics , 2019 .

[9]  Amsale K. Temesgen,et al.  Circular Economy – Reducing Symptoms or Radical Change? , 2019, Philosophy of Management.

[10]  Martijn Burger,et al.  The heterogeneous skill-base of circular economy employment , 2019, Research Policy.

[11]  Cindy Isenhour,et al.  On Materiality and Meaning: Ethnographic Engagements with Reuse, Repair & Care , 2019, Worldwide Waste: Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies.

[12]  C. Henke Negotiating Repair: The Infrastructural Contexts of Practice and Power , 2018, Repair Work Ethnographies.

[13]  S. Jackson Repair as Transition: Time, Materiality, and Hope , 2018, Repair Work Ethnographies.

[14]  N. Pidgeon,et al.  Why Is Ownership an Issue? Exploring Factors That Determine Public Acceptance of Product-Service Systems , 2018, Sustainability.

[15]  Steve Evans,et al.  Product-service systems business models for circular supply chains , 2018 .

[16]  Duncan McLaren,et al.  In a broken world: Towards an ethics of repair in the Anthropocene , 2018 .

[17]  Harald Wieser,et al.  Exploring the inner loops of the circular economy: Replacement, repair, and reuse of mobile phones in Austria , 2018 .

[18]  Hervé Corvellec,et al.  A decoupling perspective on circular business model implementation: Illustrations from Swedish apparel , 2018 .

[19]  Leonardo Rosado,et al.  Circular economy – From review of theories and practices to development of implementation tools , 2017, Resources, Conservation and Recycling.

[20]  Impacts of circular economy policies on the labour market , 2018 .

[21]  J. Korhonen,et al.  Circular Economy: The Concept and its Limitations , 2018 .

[22]  R. Merli,et al.  How do scholars approach the circular economy? A systematic literature review , 2017 .

[23]  M. Hekkert,et al.  Conceptualizing the Circular Economy: An Analysis of 114 Definitions , 2017 .

[24]  R. Mugge A consumer’s perspective on the circular economy , 2017 .

[25]  L. Vinsel Maintenance as Romance: Recuperating Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance , 2017 .

[26]  Valeria Graziano,et al.  The politics of collective repair: examining object-relations in a postwork society , 2017 .

[27]  F. Valenzuela,et al.  Against wasted politics: a critique of the circulareconomy , 2017 .

[28]  Herman I. Stål,et al.  Sustainable Consumption and Value Propositions: Exploring Product–Service System Practices Among Swedish Fashion Firms , 2017 .

[29]  L. Araujo,et al.  Product biographies in servitization and the circular economy , 2017 .

[30]  Conny Bakker,et al.  Developing a reparability indicator for electronic products , 2016, 2016 Electronics Goes Green 2016+ (EGG).

[31]  Daniela Karin Rosner,et al.  Values in Repair , 2016, CHI.

[32]  Pascale Marangé,et al.  Maintenance best way for meeting the challenge of regeneration , 2016 .

[33]  Jonathan Chapman,et al.  Emotionally Durable Design: Objects, Experiences and Empathy , 2015 .

[34]  K. Skånberg The Circular Economy and Benefits for Society , 2015 .

[35]  G. Fine Together: The Rituals, Pleasures, and Politics of Cooperation , 2012, European Journal of Sociology.

[36]  S. Kvale,et al.  InterViews: Learning the Craft of Qualitative Research Interviewing , 1996 .

[37]  I. Illich Tools for Conviviality , 1973 .