Characterizing users’ visual analytic activity for insight provenance

Insight provenance - a historical record of the process and rationale by which an insight is derived - is an essential requirement in many visual analytics applications. While work in this area has relied on either manually recorded provenance (e.g., user notes) or automatically recorded event-based insight provenance (e.g., clicks, drags, and key-presses), both approaches have fundamental limitations. Our aim is to develop a new approach that combines the benefits of both approaches while avoiding their deficiencies. Toward this goal, we characterize userspsila visual analytic activity at multiple levels of granularity. Moreover, we identify a critical level of abstraction, Actions, that can be used to represent visual analytic activity with a set of general but semantically meaningful behavior types. In turn, the action types can be used as the semantic building blocks for insight provenance. We present a catalog of common actions identified through observations of several different visual analytic systems. In addition, we define a taxonomy to categorize actions into three major classes based on their semantic intent. The concept of actions has been integrated into our labpsilas prototype visual analytic system, HARVEST, as the basis for its insight provenance capabilities.

[1]  Michelle X. Zhou,et al.  Interactive Visual Synthesis of Analytic Knowledge , 2006, 2006 IEEE Symposium On Visual Analytics Science And Technology.

[2]  John Riedl,et al.  An operator interaction framework for visualization systems , 1998, Proceedings IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization (Cat. No.98TB100258).

[3]  Clayton Lewis,et al.  A problem-oriented classification of visualization techniques , 1990, Proceedings of the First IEEE Conference on Visualization: Visualization `90.

[4]  Robert Harper,et al.  Stories in GeoTime , 2007 .

[5]  Emilie M. Roth,et al.  Using Cognitive Task Analysis (CTA) to Seed Design Concepts for Intelligence Analysts Under Data Overload , 2001 .

[6]  Kristin A. Cook,et al.  Illuminating the Path: The Research and Development Agenda for Visual Analytics , 2005 .

[7]  Jean Scholtz,et al.  In Depth Observational Studies of Professional Intelligence Analysis , 2004 .

[8]  Steven F. Roth,et al.  On the semantics of interactive visualizations , 1996, Proceedings IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization '96.

[9]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  The eyes have it: a task by data type taxonomy for information visualizations , 1996, Proceedings 1996 IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages.

[10]  Paula J. Cowley,et al.  Instrumenting the Intelligence Analysis Process , 2005 .

[11]  Dennis P. Groth,et al.  Provenance and Annotation for Visual Exploration Systems , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[12]  Colin G. Ellard,et al.  Context and consciousness , 1995, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[13]  Jarke J. van Wijk,et al.  Supporting the analytical reasoning process in information visualization , 2008, CHI.

[14]  P. Pirolli,et al.  The Sensemaking Process and Leverage Points for Analyst Technology as Identified Through Cognitive Task Analysis , 2007 .

[15]  Steven K. Feiner,et al.  Visual task characterization for automated visual discourse synthesis , 1998, CHI.

[16]  A. N. Leont’ev,et al.  Activity, consciousness, and personality , 1978 .

[17]  Martin Wattenberg,et al.  ManyEyes: a Site for Visualization at Internet Scale , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[18]  Michelle X. Zhou,et al.  An Empirical Study of User Interaction Behavior during Visual Analysis , 2007 .

[19]  Ed H. Chi,et al.  A taxonomy of visualization techniques using the data state reference model , 2000, IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization 2000. INFOVIS 2000. Proceedings.

[20]  Michelle X. Zhou,et al.  A Study of Information Gathering and Result Processing in Intelligence Analysis , 2006 .

[21]  Cláudio T. Silva,et al.  VisTrails: enabling interactive multiple-view visualizations , 2005, VIS 05. IEEE Visualization, 2005..

[22]  Chris North,et al.  An Insight-Based Longitudinal Study of Visual Analytics , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[23]  Michael Gertz,et al.  A model for the visualization exploration process , 2002, IEEE Visualization, 2002. VIS 2002..

[24]  Thomas Nocke,et al.  A History Mechanism for Visual Data Mining , 2004 .

[25]  John Stasko,et al.  BEST PAPER: A Knowledge Task-Based Framework for Design and Evaluation of Information Visualizations , 2004 .

[26]  John T. Stasko,et al.  Low-level components of analytic activity in information visualization , 2005, IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization, 2005. INFOVIS 2005..