Multi-competence Cybernetics: The Study of Multiobjective Artificial Systems and Multi-fitness Natural Systems

This chapter provides a comparative discussion on natural and artificial systems. It focuses on multiobjective problems as related to the evolution of systems either naturally or artificially; yet, it should be viewed as relevant to other forms of adaptation. Research developments in areas such as evolutionary design, plant biology, robotics, A-life, biotechnology, and game theory are used to support the comparative discussion. A unified approach, namely multi-competence cybernetics (MCC) is suggested. This is followed by a discussion on the relevance of a Pareto approach to the study of nature. One outcome of the current MCC study is a suggested analogy between species and design concepts. Another resulting suggestion is that multi-fitness dynamic visualization of natural systems should be of a scientific value, and in particular for the pursuit of understanding of natural evolution by way of ∈dexthought experimentthought experiments. It is hoped, at best, that MCC would direct thinking into fruitful new observations on the multi-fitness aspects of natural adaptation. Alternatively, it is expected that such studies would allow a better understanding of the similarities and dissimilarities between the creation of natural and artificial systems by adaptive processes.

[1]  G. K. Suraishkumar,et al.  Multi-objective optimization in Aspergillus niger fermentation for selective product enhancement , 2005, Bioprocess and biosystems engineering.

[2]  S. Gould The Structure of Evolutionary Theory , 2002 .

[3]  Ichiro Nishizaki,et al.  Fuzzy and Multiobjective Games for Conflict Resolution , 2001 .

[4]  Hussein A. Abbass,et al.  Multiobjectivity and complexity in embodied cognition , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation.

[5]  A. Bejan,et al.  Constructal theory of generation of configuration in nature and engineering , 2006 .

[6]  L. Nottale Fractal space-time and microphysics , 1993 .

[7]  Elliott Sober,et al.  Adaptationism and Optimality , 2001 .

[8]  R. Dawkins The Blind Watchmaker , 1986 .

[9]  Christopher A. Mattson,et al.  Pareto Frontier Based Concept Selection Under Uncertainty, with Visualization , 2005 .

[10]  Kalyanmoy Deb,et al.  Searching for Robust Pareto-Optimal Solutions in Multi-objective Optimization , 2005, EMO.

[11]  Peter J. Bentley,et al.  Evolutionary Design By Computers , 1999 .

[12]  I. C. Parmee Human — Centric Intelligent Systems for Design Exploration and Knowledge Discovery , 2005 .

[13]  Leon Poladian,et al.  Multi-objective evolutionary algorithms and phylogenetic inference with multiple data sets , 2006, Soft Comput..

[14]  T. Pukkala Multi-objective Forest Planning , 2002, Managing Forest Ecosystems.

[15]  Joshua D. Knowles,et al.  Multiobjective Optimization in Bioinformatics and Computational Biology , 2007, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics.

[16]  Gideon Avigad,et al.  The Extended Concept-based Multi-objective Path Planning and its A-life implications , 2007, 2007 IEEE Symposium on Artificial Life.

[17]  Gideon Avigad,et al.  Set-based concept selection in multi-objective problems: optimality versus variability approach , 2009 .

[18]  William Gordon Whaley,et al.  Principles of biology , 1958 .

[19]  John H. Holland,et al.  Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems: An Introductory Analysis with Applications to Biology, Control, and Artificial Intelligence , 1992 .

[20]  J. M. Smith,et al.  Optimality theory in evolutionary biology , 1990, Nature.

[21]  K. Niklas COMPUTER MODELS OF EARLY LAND PLANT EVOLUTION , 2004 .

[22]  Norbert Wiener,et al.  Cybernetics: Control and Communication in the Animal and the Machine. , 1949 .

[23]  P. Abrams Adaptationism and Optimality: Adaptationism, Optimality Models, and Tests of Adaptive Scenarios , 2001 .

[24]  Yaochu Jin,et al.  Multi-Objective Machine Learning , 2006, Studies in Computational Intelligence.

[25]  K. Niklas,et al.  Theories of optimization, form and function in branching architecture in plants , 1995 .

[26]  Gideon Avigad,et al.  Interactive Concept-based Search using MOEA: The Hierarchical Preferences Case , 2005, IEC.

[27]  S. Sarkar Maynard Smith, optimization, and evolution , 2006 .

[28]  Justo Puerto,et al.  Set-valued TU-games , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[29]  Semyon Savransky,et al.  Engineering of Creativity: Introduction to TRIZ Methodology of Inventive Problem Solving , 2000 .

[30]  Carlos A. Coello Coello,et al.  Recent Trends in Evolutionary Multiobjective Optimization , 2005, Evolutionary Multiobjective Optimization.

[31]  Gideon Avigad,et al.  Concept-based multi-objective problems and their solution by EC , 2007, GECCO '07.

[32]  A. Bejan Shape and Structure, from Engineering to Nature , 2000 .

[33]  L. Jain,et al.  Evolutionary multiobjective optimization : theoretical advances and applications , 2005 .