Determination of optimal ultrasound planes for the initialisation of image registration during endoscopic ultrasound-guided procedures

PurposeNavigation of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided procedures of the upper gastrointestinal (GI) system can be technically challenging due to the small fields-of-view of ultrasound and optical devices, as well as the anatomical variability and limited number of orienting landmarks during navigation. Co-registration of an EUS device and a pre-procedure 3D image can enhance the ability to navigate. However, the fidelity of this contextual information depends on the accuracy of registration. The purpose of this study was to develop and test the feasibility of a simulation-based planning method for pre-selecting patient-specific EUS-visible anatomical landmark locations to maximise the accuracy and robustness of a feature-based multimodality registration method.MethodsA registration approach was adopted in which landmarks are registered to anatomical structures segmented from the pre-procedure volume. The predicted target registration errors (TREs) of EUS-CT registration were estimated using simulated visible anatomical landmarks and a Monte Carlo simulation of landmark localisation error. The optimal planes were selected based on the 90th percentile of TREs, which provide a robust and more accurate EUS-CT registration initialisation. The method was evaluated by comparing the accuracy and robustness of registrations initialised using optimised planes versus non-optimised planes using manually segmented CT images and simulated ($$n=9$$n=9) or retrospective clinical ($$n=1$$n=1) EUS landmarks.ResultsThe results show a lower 90th percentile TRE when registration is initialised using the optimised planes compared with a non-optimised initialisation approach (p value $$< 0.01$$<0.01).ConclusionsThe proposed simulation-based method to find optimised EUS planes and landmarks for EUS-guided procedures may have the potential to improve registration accuracy. Further work will investigate applying the technique in a clinical setting.

[1]  Rangasami L. Kashyap,et al.  Building Skeleton Models via 3-D Medial Surface/Axis Thinning Algorithms , 1994, CVGIP Graph. Model. Image Process..

[2]  Richard J. Beckman,et al.  A Comparison of Three Methods for Selecting Values of Input Variables in the Analysis of Output From a Computer Code , 2000, Technometrics.

[3]  Dean C. Barratt,et al.  Towards Image-Guided Pancreas and Biliary Endoscopy: Automatic Multi-organ Segmentation on Abdominal CT with Dense Dilated Networks , 2017, MICCAI.

[4]  Carl-Fredrik Westin,et al.  Robust Generalized Total Least Squares Iterative Closest Point Registration , 2004, MICCAI.

[5]  Jay B. West,et al.  Predicting error in rigid-body point-based registration , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[6]  Randy E. Ellis,et al.  Analytic Expressions for Fiducial and Surface Target Registration Error , 2006, MICCAI.

[7]  Bostjan Likar,et al.  A review of 3D/2D registration methods for image-guided interventions , 2012, Medical Image Anal..

[8]  Lena Maier-Hein,et al.  Convergent Iterative Closest-Point Algorithm to Accomodate Anisotropic and Inhomogenous Localization Error , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[9]  Peter Hall,et al.  Improving coverage accuracy of nonparametric prediction intervals , 2001 .

[10]  M. Figl,et al.  2D/3D registration of endoscopic ultrasound to CT volume data , 2008, Physics in medicine and biology.

[11]  A. Saftoiu,et al.  A novel fusion imaging system for endoscopic ultrasound , 2016, Endoscopic ultrasound.

[12]  Dean C. Barratt,et al.  Assessment of Electromagnetic Tracking Accuracy for Endoscopic Ultrasound , 2016, CARE@MICCAI.

[13]  M. Pérez-Miranda,et al.  Role of endoscopic ultrasound in the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. , 2014, World journal of gastrointestinal oncology.

[14]  Nassir Navab,et al.  Patient Position Detection for SAR Optimization in Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2006, MICCAI.

[15]  S. Gautam,et al.  The learning curve for EUS-guided FNA of pancreatic cancer. , 2004, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[16]  Nassir Navab,et al.  Hybrid electromagnetic and image-based tracking of endoscopes with guaranteed smooth output , 2013, International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery.

[17]  Raúl San José Estépar,et al.  Towards scarless surgery: An endoscopic ultrasound navigation system for transgastric access procedures , 2007, Computer aided surgery : official journal of the International Society for Computer Aided Surgery.

[18]  Frank Lindseth,et al.  Computer‐assisted 3D ultrasound‐guided neurosurgery: technological contributions, including multimodal registration and advanced display, demonstrating future perspectives , 2006, The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS.