GHG emission factors for bioelectricity, biomethane, and bioethanol quantified for 24 biomass substrates with consequential life-cycle assessment.

Greenhouse gas (GHG) emission savings from biofuels dramatically depend upon the source of energy displaced and the effects induced outside the energy sector, for instance land-use changes (LUC). Using consequential life-cycle assessment and including LUC effects, this study provides GHG emission factors (EFs) for bioelectricity, biomethane, and bioethanol produced from twenty-four biomasses (from dedicated crops to residues of different origin) under a fossil and a non-fossil energy system. Accounting for numerous variations in the pathways, a total of 554 GHG EFs were quantified. The results showed that, important GHG savings were obtained with residues and seaweed, both under fossil and non-fossil energy systems. For high-yield perennial crops (e.g. willow and Miscanthus), GHG savings were achieved only under fossil energy systems. Biofuels from annual crops and residues that are today used in the feed sector should be discouraged, as LUC GHG emissions exceeded any GHG savings from displacing conventional energy sources.

[1]  Jay J. Cheng,et al.  Dilute acid pretreatment of rye straw and bermudagrass for ethanol production. , 2005, Bioresource technology.

[2]  H. Møller,et al.  Extrusion as a pretreatment to increase biogas production. , 2011, Bioresource technology.

[3]  S. Polasky,et al.  Land Clearing and the Biofuel Carbon Debt , 2008, Science.

[4]  Graeme M Walker,et al.  Bioconversion of brewer's spent grains to bioethanol. , 2008, FEMS yeast research.

[5]  Umberto Arena,et al.  A techno-economic comparison between two design configurations for a small scale, biomass-to-energy gasification based system , 2010 .

[6]  Jacinto F. Fabiosa,et al.  Use of U.S. Croplands for Biofuels Increases Greenhouse Gases Through Emissions from Land-Use Change , 2008, Science.

[7]  C. S. Fontanetti,et al.  Sugarcane vinasse: environmental implications of its use. , 2013, Waste management.

[8]  A. Faaij,et al.  Ethanol from lignocellulosic biomass: techno-economic performance in short-, middle- and long-term , 2005 .

[9]  Dominique Guyonnet,et al.  Quantifying uncertainty in LCA-modelling of waste management systems. , 2012, Waste management.

[10]  David Pennington,et al.  Recent developments in Life Cycle Assessment. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.

[11]  Miguel Brandão,et al.  LCA screening of biofuels: iLUC, biomass manipulation and soil carbon , 2013 .

[12]  Jan Larsen,et al.  Inbicon makes lignocellulosic ethanol a commercial reality , 2012 .

[13]  Thomas Højlund Christensen,et al.  Environmental assessment of garden waste management , 2009 .

[14]  Heather L MacLean,et al.  Life cycle evaluation of emerging lignocellulosic ethanol conversion technologies. , 2010, Bioresource technology.

[15]  J. Y. Zhu,et al.  Woody biomass pretreatment for cellulosic ethanol production: Technology and energy consumption evaluation. , 2010, Bioresource technology.

[16]  M. Ruth,et al.  Lignocellulosic Biomass to Ethanol Process Design and Economics Utilizing Co-Current Dilute Acid Prehydrolysis and Enzymatic Hydrolysis Current and Futuristic Scenarios , 1999 .

[17]  Vincent Mahieu,et al.  Well-to-wheels analysis of future automotive fuels and powertrains in the european context , 2004 .

[18]  D. Tonini,et al.  Environmental implications of the use of agro‐industrial residues for biorefineries: application of a deterministic model for indirect land‐use changes , 2016 .

[19]  Sara González-García,et al.  Anaerobic digestion of different feedstocks: impact on energetic and environmental balances of biogas process. , 2013, The Science of the total environment.

[20]  A. M. Buswell,et al.  The Methane Fermentation of Carbohydrates1,2 , 1933 .

[21]  N. Halberg,et al.  LCA of soybean meal , 2008 .

[22]  Vivekanand Vivekanand,et al.  Effect of different steam explosion conditions on methane potential and enzymatic saccharification of birch. , 2013, Bioresource technology.

[23]  S. Manfredi,et al.  Landfilling of waste: accounting of greenhouse gases and global warming contributions , 2009, Waste management & research : the journal of the International Solid Wastes and Public Cleansing Association, ISWA.

[24]  Henrik Wenzel,et al.  Environmental consequences of future biogas technologies based on separated slurry. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[25]  Henrik Wenzel,et al.  Carbon footprint of bioenergy pathways for the future Danish energy system , 2014 .

[26]  T. H. Christensen,et al.  Composting and compost utilization: accounting of greenhouse gases and global warming contributions , 2009, Waste management & research : the journal of the International Solid Wastes and Public Cleansing Association, ISWA.

[27]  Anders Hammer Strømman,et al.  Life cycle assessment of bioenergy systems: state of the art and future challenges. , 2011, Bioresource technology.

[28]  E. Robert,et al.  Indirect Land Use Change From Increased Biofuels Demand - Comparison of Models and Results for Marginal Biofuels Production from Different Feedstocks , 2010 .

[29]  T. Astrup,et al.  Incineration and co-combustion of waste: accounting of greenhouse gases and global warming contributions , 2009, Waste management & research : the journal of the International Solid Wastes and Public Cleansing Association, ISWA.

[30]  H. Wenzel,et al.  Environmental consequences of different carbon alternatives for increased manure-based biogas , 2014 .

[31]  R. Betts,et al.  Changes in Atmospheric Constituents and in Radiative Forcing. Chapter 2 , 2007 .

[32]  H. Wenzel,et al.  Bioenergy production from perennial energy crops: a consequential LCA of 12 bioenergy scenarios including land use changes. , 2012, Environmental science & technology.

[33]  Henrik Wenzel,et al.  Towards increased recycling of household waste: Documenting cascading effects and material efficiency of commingled recyclables and biowaste collection. , 2015, Journal of environmental management.

[34]  Yebo Li,et al.  Pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass for enhanced biogas production. , 2014 .

[35]  Henrik Wenzel,et al.  Modelling the carbon and nitrogen balances of direct land use changes from energy crops in Denmark: a consequential life cycle inventory , 2012 .

[36]  Jean-Philippe Steyer,et al.  A statistical comparison of protein and carbohydrate characterisation methodology applied on sewage sludge samples. , 2013, Water research.

[37]  Huajiang Huang,et al.  Effect of biomass species and plant size on cellulosic ethanol: A comparative process and economic analysis , 2009 .

[38]  Thomas H Christensen,et al.  Seasonal generation and composition of garden waste in Aarhus (Denmark). , 2010, Waste management.

[39]  Pål Börjesson,et al.  Environmental systems analysis of biogas systems—Part I: Fuel-cycle emissions , 2006 .

[40]  H. Uellendahl,et al.  Energy balance and cost-benefit analysis of biogas production from perennial energy crops pretreated by wet oxidation. , 2008, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[41]  Jian Shi,et al.  Sugar yields from dilute sulfuric acid and sulfur dioxide pretreatments and subsequent enzymatic hydrolysis of switchgrass. , 2011, Bioresource technology.

[42]  Veronica Martinez-Sanchez,et al.  Material resources, energy, and nutrient recovery from waste: are waste refineries the solution for the future? , 2013, Environmental science & technology.

[43]  Thilde Fruergaard,et al.  Life-cycle assessment of selected management options for air pollution control residues from waste incineration. , 2010, The Science of the total environment.