Porous tantalum shell and augment for acetabular defect reconstruction in revision total hip arthroplasty: a mid-term follow-up study

[1]  R. Malhotra,et al.  Results of trabecular metal augments in Paprosky IIIA and IIIB defects: A MULTICENTRE STUDY , 2018, The bone & joint journal.

[2]  R. Bitsch,et al.  Comparison of the stability of three fixation techniques between porous metal acetabular components and augments , 2018, Bone & joint research.

[3]  A. Hanssen,et al.  Minimum Five-Year Outcomes with Porous Tantalum Acetabular Cup and Augment Construct in Complex Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty , 2017, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[4]  J. Argenson,et al.  Use of porous tantalum components in Paprosky two and three acetabular revision. A minimum five-year follow-up of fifty one hips , 2017, International Orthopaedics.

[5]  B. Masri,et al.  Porous tantalum uncemented acetabular components in revision total hip arthroplasty: a minimum ten-year clinical, radiological and quality of life outcome study. , 2016, The bone & joint journal.

[6]  W. Shon,et al.  Acetabular Reconstruction in Total Hip Arthroplasty , 2016, Hip & pelvis.

[7]  M. A. Miranda,et al.  Use of jumbo cups for revision of acetabulae with large bony defects. , 2010, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[8]  D. Backstein,et al.  Combined trabecular metal acetabular shell and augment for acetabular revision with substantial bone loss: a mid-term review. , 2013, The bone & joint journal.

[9]  Michael J. Christie,et al.  Pelvic Discontinuity Treated With Custom Triflange Component: A Reliable Option , 2012, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[10]  L. Daltroy,et al.  The Self-Administered Patient Satisfaction Scale for Primary Hip and Knee Arthroplasty , 2011, Arthritis.

[11]  C. McCollough,et al.  Bone remodeling around porous metal cementless acetabular components. , 2010, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[12]  B. Masri,et al.  Modular Tantalum Augments for Acetabular Defects in Revision Hip Arthroplasty , 2009, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[13]  T. Sculco,et al.  Reconstruction of the failed acetabular component using cemented shells and impaction grafting in revision hip arthroplasty. , 2008, American journal of orthopedics.

[14]  I. Heyligers,et al.  High rate of failure of impaction grafting in large acetabular defects. , 2007, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[15]  M. Bostrom,et al.  Acetabular Revision with the Contour Antiprotrusio Cage: 2- to 5-Year Followup , 2006, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[16]  J. Jacobs,et al.  Applications of porous tantalum in total hip arthroplasty. , 2006, The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.

[17]  S. Sporer,et al.  The use of a trabecular metal acetabular component and trabecular metal augment for severe acetabular defects. , 2006, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[18]  Joshua J Jacobs,et al.  Experimental and clinical performance of porous tantalum in orthopedic surgery. , 2006, Biomaterials.

[19]  C. Engh,et al.  Radiographic Signs of Osseointegration in Porous-coated Acetabular Components , 2006, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[20]  A. Gross,et al.  The Current Role of Structural Grafts and Cages in Revision Arthroplasty of the Hip , 2004, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[21]  W. Paprosky,et al.  Structural acetabular allograft in revision total hip arthroplasty. , 2002, American journal of orthopedics.

[22]  W H Harris,et al.  High placement of an acetabular component inserted without cement in a revision total hip arthroplasty. Results after a mean of ten years. , 1999, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[23]  Michael Tanzer,et al.  Characteristics of bone ingrowth and interface mechanics of a new porous tantalum biomaterial. , 1999, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[24]  J. Lawrence,et al.  Acetabular defect classification and surgical reconstruction in revision arthroplasty. A 6-year follow-up evaluation. , 1994, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[25]  C. Goldsmith,et al.  Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. , 1988, The Journal of rheumatology.