Experimental ossicular fixations and the middle ear’s response to sound: Evidence for a flexible ossicular chain

A human temporal-bone preparation was used to determine the effects of various degrees of artificial ossicular fixation on the sound-induced velocity at the input-side (the umbo of the malleus) and the output-side (the stapes) of the ossicular chain. Construction of various degrees of attachment between an ossicle and the surrounding temporal bone provided a range of reduction in ossicular mobility or "fixations". The results demonstrate different effects of the fixations on the umbo and stapes velocity: fixations of the stapes or incus produce larger reductions in sound-induced stapes velocity (as much as 40-50 dB with extensive stapes fixation), than reductions in umbo velocity (typically less than 10 dB). Fixations of the malleus produce similar-sized changes in both umbo and stapes velocity. These differential effects are consistent with significant flexibility in the ossicular joints (the incudo-malleolar joint and the incudo-stapedial joint) that permits relative motion between the coupled ossicles. The existence of flexibility in the ossicular joints indicates that joints in the ossicular chain can effect a loss of sound-induced mechanical energy between the umbo and the stapes, with a concomitant reduction in the sound-induced motion of the stapes. The introduction of such losses in sound transmission by the joints raises questions concerning the utility of three ossicles in the mammalian ear. The consequences of ossicular flexibility to ossicular-chain reconstruction is discussed. Also, as examined in a more clinically directed paper [Laryngoscope 115 (2005) 147], the different effects of the various ossicular fixations on the motion of the umbo and malleus may be useful in the diagnosis of the site of fixations in humans with conductive hearing losses caused by such pathologies.

[1]  THE MOBILITY OF THE INCUDO-MALLEOLAR JOINT AND ASSOCIATED MIDDLE-EAR TRANSMISSION LOSSES , 2004 .

[2]  S. Khanna,et al.  Malleus vibration mode changes with frequency , 1991, Hearing Research.

[3]  K Gyo,et al.  Measurement of the ossicular vibration ratio in human temporal bones by use of a video measuring system. , 1987, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[4]  W. F. Decraemer,et al.  MEASUREMENT, VISUALIZATION AND QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS OF COMPLETE THREE-DIMENSIONAL KINEMATICAL DATA SETS OF HUMAN AND CAT MIDDLE EAR , 2004 .

[5]  W R Funnell,et al.  On the degree of rigidity of the manubrium in a finite-element model of the cat eardrum. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  M LAWRENCE,et al.  The middle ear in sound conduction. , 1948, Archives of otolaryngology.

[7]  A. Crompton,et al.  Evolution of the mammalian masticatory apparatus. , 1978, American scientist.

[8]  L. U. E. Kohllöffel,et al.  Notes on the comparative mechanics of hearing. II. On cochlear shunts in birds , 1984, Hearing Research.

[9]  O. W. Henson,et al.  Comparative Anatomy of the Middle Ear , 1974 .

[10]  T. Konishi,et al.  The Temporal Relationship Between Motion of the Basilar Membrane and Initiation of Nerve Impulses in the Auditory Nerve Fibers , 1973 .

[11]  K Nakamura,et al.  Laser Doppler vibrometer (LDV)--a new clinical tool for the otologist. , 1996, The American journal of otology.

[12]  E. Allin,et al.  Evolution of the mammalian middle ear , 1975, Journal of morphology.

[13]  Saumil N Merchant,et al.  A normative study of tympanic membrane motion in humans using a laser Doppler vibrometer (LDV) , 2004, Hearing Research.

[14]  Saumil N Merchant,et al.  Experimental and Clinical Studies of Malleus Fixation , 2005, The Laryngoscope.

[15]  Ugo Fisch,et al.  Evaluation of Eardrum Laser Doppler Interferometry as a Diagnostic Tool , 2001, The Laryngoscope.

[16]  John J. Rosowski,et al.  Middle-ear transmission: Acoustic versus ossicular coupling in cat and human , 1992, Hearing Research.

[17]  J. Nadol,et al.  Malleus Fixation: Clinical and Histopathologic Findings , 2002, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.

[18]  K. Kermack,et al.  THE EAR IN MAMMAL-LIKE REPTILES AND EARLY MAMMALS , 1983 .

[19]  L. Kohllöffel,et al.  Notes on the comparative mechanics of hearing. I. A shock-proof ear , 1984, Hearing Research.

[20]  K. Kermack,et al.  The evolution of mammalian characters , 1984 .

[21]  X. Pang,et al.  How Do Contractions of the Stapedius Muscle Alter the Acoustic Properties of the Ear , 1986 .

[22]  Functional changes in the aging mouse middle ear , 1996, Hearing Research.

[23]  John J. Rosowski,et al.  Hearing in Transitional Mammals: Predictions from the Middle-Ear Anatomy and Hearing Capabilities of Extant Mammals , 1992 .

[24]  Stefan Stenfelt,et al.  Fluid volume displacement at the oval and round windows with air and bone conduction stimulation. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[25]  Jozef J. Zwislocki,et al.  Analysis of the Middle‐Ear Function. Part I: Input Impedance , 1962 .

[26]  J. Rosowski,et al.  The Aging of the Middle Ear in 129S6/SvEvTac and CBA/CaJ Mice: Measurements of Umbo Velocity, Hearing Function, and the Incidence of Pathology , 2003, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[27]  M. Sanders Handbook of Sensory Physiology , 1975 .

[28]  Yehudah L. Werner,et al.  The Middle Ear of Reptiles and Birds , 2000 .

[29]  A. Huber,et al.  The incudo-malleolar joint and sound transmission losses , 2002, Hearing Research.

[30]  John J. Rosowski,et al.  Mechanisms of hearing loss resulting from middle-ear fluid , 2004, Hearing Research.

[31]  M. Kringlebotn,et al.  The equality of volume displacements in the inner ear windows. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[32]  John J. Rosowski,et al.  Cadaver Middle Ears as Models for Living Ears: Comparisons of Middle Ear Input Immittance , 1990, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.

[33]  W. T. Peake,et al.  Middle-ear characteristics of anesthetized cats. , 1967, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[34]  B Masterton,et al.  The evolution of human hearing. , 1969, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[35]  K B Hüttenbrink,et al.  The mechanics of the middle-ear at static air pressures: the role of the ossicular joints, the function of the middle-ear muscles and the behaviour of stapedial prostheses. , 1988, Acta oto-laryngologica. Supplementum.

[36]  Dr. Gerald Fleischer Evolutionary Principles of the Mammalian Middle Ear , 1979, Advances in Anatomy, Embryology and Cell Biology.

[37]  Jozef J. Zwislocki,et al.  Analysis of the Middle‐Ear Function. Part II: Guinea‐Pig Ear , 1963 .

[38]  K Nakamura,et al.  New knowledge about the function of the human middle ear: development of an improved analog model. , 1994, The American journal of otology.

[39]  John J. Rosowski,et al.  Diagnostic Utility of Laser-Doppler Vibrometry in Conductive Hearing Loss with Normal Tympanic Membrane , 2003, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[40]  G. Békésy,et al.  Experiments in Hearing , 1963 .

[41]  Ugo Fisch,et al.  Intraoperative Assessment of Stapes Movement , 2001, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.

[42]  S. Khanna,et al.  New insights in the functioning of the middle ear , 1999 .

[43]  E. Allin,et al.  Evolution of the Auditory System in Synapsida (“Mammal-Like Reptiles” and Primitive Mammals) as Seen in the Fossil Record , 1992 .

[44]  Harold F. Schuknecht,et al.  Pathology of the Ear , 1974 .

[45]  William T. Peake,et al.  MODELING FLEXIBILITY IN THE HUMAN OSSICULAR CHAIN: COMPARISON TO OSSICULAR FIXATION DATA , 2004 .

[46]  H. House,et al.  The fixed malleus head. A report of 35 cases. , 1967, Archives of otolaryngology.