Auditory and auditory-visual intelligibility of speech in fluctuating maskers for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Harvey Fletcher,et al. The nature of speech and its interpretation , 1922 .
[2] T W Tillman,et al. Interaction of competing speech signals with hearing losses. , 1970, Archives of otolaryngology.
[3] A. M. Mimpen,et al. Improving the reliability of testing the speech reception threshold for sentences. , 1979, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.
[4] T Houtgast,et al. A physical method for measuring speech-transmission quality. , 1980, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[5] B E Walden,et al. Some effects of training on speech recognition by hearing-impaired adults. , 1981, Journal of speech and hearing research.
[6] Q Summerfield,et al. Psychoacoustic and phonetic temporal processing in normal and hearing-impaired listeners. , 1982, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[7] C Ludvigsen. Relations among some psychoacoustic parameters in normal and cochlearly impaired listeners. , 1985, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[8] B C Moore,et al. Auditory filter shapes in subjects with unilateral and bilateral cochlear impairments. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[9] B. Moore,et al. Psychoacoustic abilities of subjects with unilateral and bilateral cochlear hearing impairments and their relationship to the ability to understand speech. , 1989, Scandinavian audiology. Supplementum.
[10] A M Simpson,et al. Spectral enhancement to improve the intelligibility of speech in noise for hearing-impaired listeners. , 1990, Acta oto-laryngologica. Supplementum.
[11] Articulation index: Importance function in the intensity domain , 1990 .
[12] R. Plomp,et al. Effects of fluctuating noise and interfering speech on the speech-reception threshold for impaired and normal hearing. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[13] L. Braida. Crossmodal Integration in the Identification of Consonant Segments , 1991, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.
[14] S P Bacon,et al. Modulation detection, modulation masking, and speech understanding in noise in the elderly. , 1992, Journal of speech and hearing research.
[15] S. Arlinger,et al. Normal-hearing and hearing-impaired subjects' ability to just follow conversation in competing speech, reversed speech, and noise backgrounds. , 1992, Journal of speech and hearing research.
[16] W M Rabinowitz,et al. Relations among different measures of speech reception in subjects using a cochlear implant. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[17] Ken W. Grant,et al. Evaluating the articulation index for auditory–visual consonant recognition , 1993 .
[18] R. Plomp,et al. Effect of spectral envelope smearing on speech reception. II. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[19] B C Moore,et al. Effects of spectral smearing on the intelligibility of sentences in the presence of interfering speech. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[20] S. Soli,et al. Development of the Hearing in Noise Test for the measurement of speech reception thresholds in quiet and in noise. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[21] D D Dirks,et al. Speech recognition in amplitude-modulated noise of listeners with normal and listeners with impaired hearing. , 1995, Journal of speech and hearing research.
[22] B C Moore,et al. The identification of vowel-like harmonic complexes: effects of component phase, level, and fundamental frequency. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[23] J. Driver. Enhancement of selective listening by illusory mislocation of speech sounds due to lip-reading , 1996, Nature.
[24] Thomas Baer,et al. Speech reception thresholds in noise with and without spectral and temporal dips for hearing‐impaired and normally hearing people , 1997 .
[25] S. Bacon,et al. The effects of hearing loss and noise masking on the masking release for speech in temporally complex backgrounds. , 1998, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.
[26] Van Summers,et al. Masking of tones and speech by Schroeder-phase harmonic complexes in normally hearing and hearing-impaired listeners , 1998, Hearing Research.
[27] R L Freyman,et al. The role of perceived spatial separation in the unmasking of speech. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[28] R. W. Hukin,et al. Effectiveness of spatial cues, prosody, and talker characteristics in selective attention. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[29] P F Seitz,et al. The use of visible speech cues for improving auditory detection of spoken sentences. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[30] L. Bernstein,et al. Speech perception without hearing , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.
[31] K. Grant,et al. The effect of speechreading on masked detection thresholds for filtered speech. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[32] R L Freyman,et al. Spatial release from informational masking in speech recognition. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[33] D A Nelson,et al. A new procedure for measuring peripheral compression in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[34] B J Kwon,et al. Consonant identification under maskers with sinusoidal modulation: masking release or modulation interference? , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[35] D S Brungart,et al. Informational and energetic masking effects in the perception of two simultaneous talkers. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[36] Gerald A Studebaker,et al. Intensity-importance functions for bandlimited monosyllabic words. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[37] G. Kidd,et al. The effect of spatial separation on informational and energetic masking of speech. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[38] Wouter A Dreschler,et al. The relationship between the intelligibility of time-compressed speech and speech in noise in young and elderly listeners. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[39] Jayne B Ahlstrom,et al. Recovery from prior stimulation: masking of speech by interrupted noise for younger and older adults with normal hearing. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[40] Michael K. Qin,et al. Effects of simulated cochlear-implant processing on speech reception in fluctuating maskers. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[41] Emily Buss,et al. Temporal Fine-Structure Cues to Speech and Pure Tone Modulation in Observers with Sensorineural Hearing Loss , 2004, Ear and hearing.
[42] Michelle R. Molis,et al. Speech recognition in fluctuating and continuous maskers: effects of hearing loss and presentation level. , 2004, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.
[43] Richard L Freyman,et al. Effect of number of masking talkers and auditory priming on informational masking in speech recognition. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[44] R. Freyman,et al. The role of visual speech cues in reducing energetic and informational masking. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[45] K. S. Rhebergen,et al. A Speech Intelligibility Index-based approach to predict the speech reception threshold for sentences in fluctuating noise for normal-hearing listeners. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[46] Andrew J Oxenham,et al. The relationship between frequency selectivity and pitch discrimination: sensorineural hearing loss. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[47] T. Houtgast,et al. Factors affecting masking release for speech in modulated noise for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[48] Brian C. J. Moore,et al. Frequency discrimination of complex tones by hearing-impaired subjects: Evidence for loss of ability to use temporal fine structure , 2006, Hearing Research.
[49] Peggy B Nelson,et al. Speech perception in gated noise: the effects of temporal resolution. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[50] Douglas Brungart,et al. Informational masking of speech in children: auditory-visual integration. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[51] Christian Lorenzi,et al. Speech masking release in listeners with flat hearing loss: Effects of masker fluctuation rate on identification scores and phonetic feature reception , 2006, International journal of audiology.
[52] N. J. Versfeld,et al. Extended speech intelligibility index for the prediction of the speech reception threshold in fluctuating noise. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[53] Brian C J Moore,et al. Speech perception problems of the hearing impaired reflect inability to use temporal fine structure , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[54] R. McArdle,et al. Intra- and inter-session test, retest reliability of the Words-in-Noise (WIN) test. , 2007, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.
[55] Richard H Wilson,et al. The Words-in-Noise (WIN) test with multitalker babble and speech-spectrum noise maskers. , 2007, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.
[56] L. Bernstein,et al. Enhanced visual speech perception in individuals with early-onset hearing impairment. , 2007, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.
[57] Brian C J Moore,et al. Effects of moderate cochlear hearing loss on the ability to benefit from temporal fine structure information in speech. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[58] Richard L Freyman,et al. Spatial release from masking with noise-vocoded speech. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[59] Wouter A Dreschler,et al. Prediction of the Intelligibility for Speech in Real-Life Background Noises for Subjects With Normal Hearing , 2008, Ear and hearing.
[60] Andrew Stuart,et al. Reception thresholds for sentences in quiet, continuous noise, and interrupted noise in school-age children. , 2008, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.
[61] Andrew J Oxenham,et al. Masking release for low- and high-pass-filtered speech in the presence of noise and single-talker interference. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.