Climate change mitigation: Qualitative analysis of environmental impact-reducing strategies in German primary care

Abstract Background The German healthcare system is responsible for 5,2% of the national emissions of greenhouse gases. Therefore, mitigation actions to reduce the carbon footprint are crucial. However, there have been few approaches to achieve this in German primary care. Objectives This study aimed to identify environmental impact-reducing strategies of German primary care practices. Methods During the summer of 2021, a qualitative study was conducted using interviews and focus groups with experts in primary care across Germany, such as physicians, medical assistants, health scientists and experts on the health system level. Verbatim transcribed data were analyzed using Thematic Analysis. Results The sample comprised 26 individual interviews and two focus groups with a total of N = 40 participants. Findings provide a first overview of pursued mitigation strategies and contextual factors influencing their implementation. Strategies referred to the use of water and energy, recycling and waste management, supply chains and procurement, digitisation, mobility, patient care, behavioural changes and system level. Implementing sustainable actions in daily care was considered expensive and often unfeasible due to lack of staff, time and restrictive hygiene regulations. Participants called for more instruction on implementing mitigating actions, for example, through websites, podcasts, guidelines or quality indicators. Conclusion This study’s findings can support the development of future environmental impact-reducing strategies in primary care. Potential options for guidance and support should be considered to facilitate sustainability.

[1]  J. Szecsenyi,et al.  Building resilience in German primary care practices: a qualitative study , 2022, BMC Primary Care.

[2]  P. V. van Lange,et al.  Psychological distance: How to make climate change less abstract and closer to the self. , 2021, Current opinion in psychology.

[3]  A. Hibble,et al.  Does telemedicine reduce the carbon footprint of healthcare? A systematic review. , 2021, Future healthcare journal.

[4]  R. Boyd,et al.  Health care’s climate footprint: the health sector contribution and opportunities for action , 2020 .

[5]  J. Kneebone,et al.  General practice in the era of planetary health: Responding to the climate health emergency. , 2020, Australian journal of general practice.

[6]  J. Barnett,et al.  Characterising and justifying sample size sufficiency in interview-based studies: systematic analysis of qualitative health research over a 15-year period , 2018, BMC Medical Research Methodology.

[7]  A. Haines,et al.  Challenges and opportunities in planetary health for primary care providers. , 2018, The Lancet. Planetary health.

[8]  M. Nilsson,et al.  Nurses' perceptions of climate and environmental issues: a qualitative study. , 2015, Journal of advanced nursing.

[9]  J. Lowery,et al.  Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science , 2009, Implementation science : IS.

[10]  D. Campbell-Lendrum,et al.  The year 2008: a breakthrough year for health protection from climate change? , 2008, American journal of preventive medicine.

[11]  S. Lambert,et al.  Combining individual interviews and focus groups to enhance data richness. , 2008, Journal of advanced nursing.

[12]  Manfred Lenzen,et al.  The carbon footprint of Australian health care. , 2018, The Lancet. Planetary health.

[13]  V. Braun,et al.  Please Scroll down for Article Qualitative Research in Psychology Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology , 2022 .

[14]  Adam B. Cooper,et al.  The Lancet Commissions Institute for Global Health Health and Climate Change: Policy Responses to Protect Public Health , 2022 .