Noninvasive Estimation of the Electrohysterographic Action-Potential Conduction Velocity

Electrophysiological monitoring of the fetal-heart and the uterine-muscle activity, referred to as an electrohysterogram, is essential to permit timely treatment during pregnancy. While remarkable progress is reported for fetal-cardiac-activity monitoring, the electrohysterographic (EHG) measurement and interpretation remain challenging. In particular, little attention has been paid to the analysis of the EHG propagation, whose characteristics might be predictive of the preterm delivery. Therefore, this paper focuses, for the first time, on the noninvasive estimation of the conduction velocity of the EHG-action potentials. To this end, multichannel EHG recording and surface high-density electrodes are used. A maximum-likelihood method is employed for analyzing the EHG-action-potential propagation in two dimensions. The use of different weighting strategies of the derived cost function is introduced to deal with the poor signal similarity between different channels. The presented methods were evaluated by specific simulations proving the best weighting strategy to lead to an accuracy improvement of 56.7%. EHG measurements on ten women with uterine contractions confirmed the feasibility of the method by leading to conduction velocity values within the expected physiological range.

[1]  R. N. Scott,et al.  Statistics of the myoelectric signal from monopolar and bipolar electrodes , 2006, Medical and biological engineering.

[2]  R. Schwarz,et al.  The Uterus , 1991, Clinical Perspectives in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[3]  A. Hasenburg,et al.  External four‐channel tocography during delivery , 1994, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.

[4]  Assuring Healthy Outcomes,et al.  Preterm Birth : Causes , Consequences , and Prevention , 2005 .

[5]  William L. Maner,et al.  Identification of Human Term and Preterm Labor using Artificial Neural Networks on Uterine Electromyography Data , 2007, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[6]  C. A. Grimbergen,et al.  HIGH QUALITY RECORDING OF BIOELECTRIC EVENTS . I : INTERFERENCE REDUCTION , THEORY AND PRACTICE , 2009 .

[7]  Wim J. E. P. Lammers,et al.  Circulating excitations and re-entry in the pregnant uterus , 1996, Pflügers Archiv.

[8]  G. Wolfs,et al.  Electromyographic Observations on the Human Uterus during Labour , 1979, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica. Supplement.

[9]  Massimo Mischi,et al.  Estimation of internal uterine pressure by joint amplitude and frequency analysis of electrohysterographic signals , 2008, Physiological measurement.

[10]  D. Farina,et al.  Estimation of single motor unit conduction velocity from surface electromyogram signals detected with linear electrode arrays , 2001, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[11]  W. Lammers,et al.  Patterns of electrical propagation in the intact pregnant guinea pig uterus. , 2008, American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology.

[12]  C. Marque,et al.  Use of the electrohysterogram signal for characterization of contractions during pregnancy , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[13]  E E Daniel,et al.  Gap junctions: their presence and necessity in myometrium during parturition. , 1977, Science.

[14]  R C Young.  Tissue-Level Signaling and Control of Uterine Contractility: The Action Potential—Calcium Wave Hypothesis , 2000, The Journal of the Society for Gynecologic Investigation: JSGI.

[15]  M. Mischi,et al.  Electrohysterographic conduction velocity estimation , 2009, 2009 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[16]  Dimitris G. Manolakis,et al.  Statistical and Adaptive Signal Processing , 2000 .

[17]  R. Merletti,et al.  Methods for estimating muscle fibre conduction velocity from surface electromyographic signals , 2004, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[18]  Jeffrey C. Lagarias,et al.  Convergence Properties of the Nelder-Mead Simplex Method in Low Dimensions , 1998, SIAM J. Optim..

[19]  C. Rabotti,et al.  Accuracy of Frequency-Related Parameters of the Electrohysterogram for Predicting Preterm Delivery: A Review of the Literature , 2009, Obstetrical & gynecological survey.

[20]  J. Jezewski,et al.  Quantitative analysis of contraction patterns in electrical activity signal of pregnant uterus as an alternative to mechanical approach , 2005, Physiological measurement.

[21]  T. Y. El-Sharkawy,et al.  Spatial and temporal variations in local spike propagation in the myometrium of the 17-day pregnant rat. , 1994, The American journal of physiology.

[22]  C Marque,et al.  Uterine electromyography: a critical review. , 1993, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[23]  Massimo Mischi,et al.  Inter-electrode delay estimators for electrohysterographic propagation analysis , 2009, Physiological measurement.

[24]  G. Saade,et al.  Predicting Term and Preterm Delivery With Transabdominal Uterine Electromyography , 2003, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[25]  Dario Farina,et al.  Estimation of average muscle fiber conduction velocity from two-dimensional surface EMG recordings , 2004, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[26]  D. Stegeman,et al.  Multichannel surface EMG: Basic aspects and clinical utility , 2003, Muscle & nerve.

[27]  Dorothee E. Marossero,et al.  Spatiotemporal electrohysterography patterns in normal and arrested labor. , 2009, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[28]  Dario Farina,et al.  Estimation of Muscle Fiber Conduction Velocity With a Spectral Multidip Approach , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[29]  I. W. Hunter,et al.  Estimation of the conduction velocity of muscle action potentials using phase and impulse response function techniques , 1987, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[30]  John G. Harris,et al.  Prediction of Intrauterine Pressure From Electrohysterography Using Optimal Linear Filtering , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[31]  E E Daniel,et al.  Improved propagation in myometrium associated with gap junctions during parturition. , 1989, The American journal of physiology.

[32]  Catherine Marque,et al.  Uterine EHG Processing for Obstetrical Monitorng , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[33]  G. Saade,et al.  Comparing uterine electromyography activity of antepartum patients versus term labor patients. , 2005, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[34]  Radford M. Neal.  Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning , 2007, Technometrics.

[35]  Roberto Romero,et al.  Epidemiology and causes of preterm birth , 2008, The Lancet.

[36]  Jan W. M. Bergmans,et al.  Modeling and Identification of the Electrohysterographic Volume Conductor by High-Density Electrodes , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[37]  G. Saade,et al.  Methods and Devices for the Management of Term and Preterm Labor , 2001, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[38]  P. A. Lynn,et al.  Direct On-Line Estimation of Muscle Fiber Conduction Velocity by Surface Electromyography , 1979, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.