Predicting college students' online information searching strategies based on epistemological, motivational, decision-related, and demographic variables

This study examines the extent to which epistemological, motivational, decision-related, and demographic variables predict college students' use of online information searching strategies (behavioural, procedural, and metacognitive strategies). The participants included preservice teachers (N?=?538) from 13 universities in different parts of Turkey. Stepwise multiple regression analyses were conducted to identify the variables predicting each online information searching strategy. The results revealed that online information searching strategies were best predicted by epistemological beliefs and then decision-making styles, web search experience, and goal orientations. Students who had advanced epistemological beliefs in speed of learning tended to have better behavioural, procedural, and metacognitive strategies, while students having naive epistemological beliefs in ability to learn had lower level online searching strategies. Students having more web search experience had better online searching strategies. Additionally, as the level of students' mastery-approach goals increases, the use of procedural and metacognitive domain strategies increase as well, while the increase in the level of mastery-avoidance goals were related to the use of less behavioural domain strategies. Finally, students having rational decision styles were more likely to use higher levels of online information searching strategies, while students with avoidant styles tended to use less behavioural and procedural domain strategies. Variables predicting students' online information searching strategies (OISS) were identified.Advanced epistemological beliefs in speed of learning was related to better OISS.Students having naive epistemological beliefs in ability to learn had lower level OISS.Mastery-approach and mastery-avoidance goals differentially affected the use of OISS.Rational and avoidant decision styles differentially affected the use of OISS.

[1]  Calvin Smith,et al.  The relationship between epistemological beliefs and the propensity for lifelong learning , 2009 .

[2]  A. Elliot,et al.  Approach and avoidance temperament as basic dimensions of personality. , 2010, Journal of personality.

[3]  Peter W. Foltz,et al.  Comprehension, Coherence, and Strategies in Hypertext and Linear Text , 2012 .

[4]  Nicola Ariasi,et al.  Searching the Web to learn about a controversial topic: are students epistemically active? , 2010 .

[5]  Ching-Huei Chen,et al.  The interplay between cognitive and motivational variables in a supportive online learning system for secondary physical education , 2012, Comput. Educ..

[6]  B. Hofer Epistemological Understanding as a Metacognitive Process: Thinking Aloud During Online Searching , 2004 .

[7]  Sandra L. Fisher,et al.  DIFFERENTIAL EFFECTS OF LEARNER EFFORT AND GOAL ORIENTATION ON TWO LEARNING OUTCOMES , 1998 .

[8]  P. Pintrich,et al.  The Development of Epistemological Theories: Beliefs About Knowledge and Knowing and Their Relation to Learning , 1997 .

[9]  Reginald A. Bruce,et al.  Decision-Making Style: The Development and Assessment of a New Measure , 1995 .

[10]  Jyh-Chong Liang,et al.  University students' online information searching strategies in different search contexts , 2012 .

[11]  Helge I. Strømsø,et al.  The role of personal epistemology in the self-regulation of internet-based learning , 2010 .

[12]  Lucia Mason,et al.  Epistemic evaluation and comprehension of web-source information on controversial science-related topics: Effects of a short-term instructional intervention , 2014, Comput. Educ..

[13]  Susan M. Brookhart,et al.  Understanding Middle Students' Beliefs About Knowledge and Learning Using a Multidimensional Paradigm , 2000 .

[14]  Geraldine Clarebout,et al.  The relationships between learner variables, tool-usage behaviour and performance , 2009, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[15]  Chin-Chung Tsai,et al.  Eighth graders' web searching strategies and outcomes: The role of task types, web experiences and epistemological beliefs , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[16]  A. Elliot,et al.  A 2 X 2 achievement goal framework. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[17]  Marlene Schommer Effects of beliefs about the nature of knowledge on comprehension. , 1990 .

[18]  Meng-Jung Tsai,et al.  Online Information Searching Strategy Inventory (OISSI): A quick version and a complete version , 2009, Comput. Educ..

[19]  Yvonne Kammerer,et al.  When adults without university education search the Internet for health information: The roles of Internet-specific epistemic beliefs and a source evaluation intervention , 2015, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[20]  Kathleen M. Galotti,et al.  Decision-making styles in a real-life decision: Choosing a college major , 2006 .

[21]  Roberto Baiocco,et al.  Decision-making style among adolescents: relationship with sensation seeking and locus of control. , 2009, Journal of adolescence.

[22]  Yvonne Kammerer,et al.  The role of Internet-specific epistemic beliefs in laypersons' source evaluations and decisions during Web search on a medical issue , 2013, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[23]  Wolfgang G. Stock,et al.  Gender-specific information search behavior , 2010, Webology.

[24]  Chin-Chung Tsai,et al.  Exploring the Structural Relationships between High School Students’ Scientific Epistemological Views and their Utilization of Information Commitments toward Online Science Information , 2008 .

[25]  Chin-Chung Tsai,et al.  Epistemic Beliefs, Online Search Strategies, and Behavioral Patterns While Exploring Socioscientific Issues , 2014 .

[26]  Michael J. Middleton,et al.  Performance-Approach Goals: Good for What, for Whom, under What Circumstances, and at What Cost?. , 2001 .

[27]  Chin-Chung Tsai,et al.  Beyond cognitive and metacognitive tools: the use of the Internet as an 'epistemological' tool for instruction , 2004, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[28]  Petek Aşkar,et al.  Çevrimiçi Bilgi Arama Stratejileri Envanteri’nin Türkçeye Uyarlama Çalışması , 2013 .

[29]  Frederik Anseel,et al.  The influence of mastery‐avoidance goals on performance improvement , 2009 .

[30]  Miriam J. Metzger Making sense of credibility on the Web: Models for evaluating online information and recommendations for future research , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[31]  Andrew M. Parker,et al.  Maximizers versus satisficers: Decision-making styles, competence, and outcomes , 2007, Judgment and Decision Making.

[32]  Andrew J. Elliot,et al.  The trichotomous achievement goal model and intrinsic motivation: a sequential mediational analysis , 2002 .

[33]  Arzu Taşdelen ÖĞRETMEN ADAYLARININ BAZI PSİKO SOSYAL DEĞİŞKENLERE GÖRE KARAR VERME STİLLERİ , 2001 .

[34]  N. Yperen,et al.  A NOVEL APPROACH TO ASSESSING ACHIEVEMENT GOALS IN THE CONTEXT OF THE 2 X 2 FRAMEWORK: IDENTIFYING DISTINCT PROFILES OF INDIVIDUALS WITH DIFFERENT DOMINANT ACHIEVEMENT GOALS , 2006 .

[35]  M. Maehr,et al.  The Contributions and Prospects of Goal Orientation Theory , 2007 .

[36]  Chin-Chung Tsai,et al.  Information searching strategies in web-based science learning: the role of internet self-efficacy , 2003 .

[37]  A. Elliot,et al.  On the measurement of achievement goals: critique, illustration, and application , 2008 .

[38]  Yu-Hsin Chen,et al.  How University Students Evaluate Online Information about a Socio-scientific Issue and the Relationship with their Epistemic Beliefs , 2013, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[39]  Nathalie Huet,et al.  The influence of achievement goals and perceptions of online help on its actual use in an interactive learning environment , 2011, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[40]  D. Vandewalle Development and Validation of a Work Domain Goal Orientation Instrument , 1997 .

[41]  M. Chi,et al.  Gender Differences in Patterns of Searching the Web , 2003 .

[42]  Carol S. Dweck,et al.  Motivational processes affecting learning. , 1986 .

[43]  A. Howell,et al.  Procrastination: Associations with achievement goal orientation and learning strategies , 2007 .