Effects of Intergroup Ambivalence on Information Processing: The Role of Physiological Arousal

Previous research has found that people who are ambivalent toward a group process new information about the group more carefully than people who are nonambivalent toward the group. It has been suggested that this effect occurs because people who are ambivalent toward a group (a) experience a high level of physiological arousal when they think about the group and (b) seek to reduce this arousal by carefully processing new information about the group. To test these hypotheses, we conducted a correlational study (Study 1) and an experimental study (Study 2). Unexpectedly, Study 1 found that intergroup ambivalence is negatively correlated with the physiological arousal that is experienced when target outgroups are salient. Study 2 replicated this pattern and demonstrated an effect of intergroup ambivalence on information processing, while also discovering that the effects of ambivalence on arousal and on information processing were independent. Overall, these results indicate that arousal is not a necessary mediator of the relation between intergroup ambivalence and information processing.

[1]  M. Zanna,et al.  The conflicted individual: personality-based and domain-specific antecedents of ambivalent social attitudes. , 1995, Journal of personality.

[2]  J. Dovidio,et al.  The aversive form of racism. , 1986 .

[3]  B. C. Lacey,et al.  The relationship of resting autonomic activity to motor impulsivity. , 1958, Research publications - Association for Research in Nervous and Mental Disease.

[4]  Mark P. Zanna,et al.  Values, stereotypes, and emotions as determinants of intergroup attitudes. , 1993 .

[5]  S. Chaiken,et al.  The generality of the automatic attitude activation effect. , 1992, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[6]  K. Clark.  Looking at Pictures , 1960 .

[7]  V. Esses,et al.  Ambivalence and Response Amplification Toward Native Peoples1 , 1997 .

[8]  D T CAMPBELL,et al.  Galvanic skin response to Negro and white experimenters. , 1955, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[9]  D. Bem.  Self-Perception Theory , 1972 .

[10]  L. M. Brown,et al.  Intergroup Anxiety: A Person × Situation Approach , 1996 .

[11]  F. R. Westie,et al.  Autonomic responses and their relationship to race attitudes. , 1959, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[12]  M. Zanna,et al.  Let's not be indifferent about (attitudinal) ambivalence. , 1995 .

[13]  Timothy D. Wilson,et al.  Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. , 1977 .

[14]  Duane T. Wegener,et al.  Attitudes and attitude change. , 1997, Annual review of psychology.

[15]  J. Bailey,et al.  When Racial Ambivalence Evokes Negative Affect, Using a Disguised Measure of Mood , 1992 .

[16]  J. Michela.  Within-person correlational design and analysis. , 1990 .

[17]  M. Zanna,et al.  "Remembering" dissonance: Simultaneous accessibility of inconsistent cognitive elements moderates epistemic discomfort. , 1999 .

[18]  R. Baron,et al.  Negative emotion and superficial social processing , 1992 .

[19]  M. Lewis,et al.  Individual differences in response to stress. , 1992, Pediatrics.

[20]  Irwin Katz,et al.  Racial ambivalence and American value conflict: Correlational and priming studies of dual cognitive structures. , 1988 .

[21]  C. Spielberger,et al.  Stress and Anxiety , 1981 .

[22]  Jim Blascovich,et al.  Using electrodermal and cardiovascular measures of arousal in social psychological research. , 1990 .

[23]  K. Kaplan.  On the ambivalence-indifference problem in attitude theory and measurement: A suggested modification of the semantic differential technique. , 1972 .

[24]  Miles Hewstone,et al.  Dimensions of Contact as Predictors of Intergroup Anxiety, Perceived Out-Group Variability, and Out-Group Attitude: An Integrative Model , 1993 .

[25]  Gregory R. Maio,et al.  The Role of Attitudinal Ambivalence in Susceptibility to Consensus Information , 2001 .

[26]  M. Dawson,et al.  Affective Reactions in the Blink of an Eye: Individual Differences in Subjective Experience and Physiological Responses to Emotional Stimuli , 1998 .

[27]  Joseph P. Forgas,et al.  The Message Within : The Role of Subjective Experience In Social Cognition And Behavior , 2000 .

[28]  Lorne M. Sulsky,et al.  Attributions of blame and forgiveness in romantic relationships: A policy-capturing study. , 1997 .

[29]  A. Elliot,et al.  On the motivational nature of cognitive dissonance: Dissonance as psychological discomfort. , 1994 .

[30]  M. Diehl,et al.  Effects of Attitudinal Ambivalence on Information Processing and Attitude-Intention Consistency☆ , 1997 .

[31]  L. Festinger.  Conflict, Decision, and Dissonance , 1964 .

[32]  T Delamothe,et al.  Looking at the pictures. , 1990, BMJ.

[33]  Charles Stangor,et al.  Affective and cognitive determinants of prejudice , 1991 .

[34]  Mark P. Zanna,et al.  Assessing the structure of prejudicial attitudes: The case of attitudes toward homosexuals. , 1993 .

[35]  福田 博一.  State-Trait Anxiety Inventoryによるペインクリニック外来患者の不安の評価 , 1994 .

[36]  G. Maio,et al.  The Formation of Attitudes Toward New Immigrant Groups , 1994 .

[37]  R. Guglielmi,et al.  Psychophysiological Assessment of Prejudice: Past Research, Current Status, and Future Directions , 1999, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[38]  S. Chaiken,et al.  Attitude strength and resistance processes. , 1995, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[39]  F. Fincham,et al.  Attitudinal Ambivalence Toward Parents and Attachment Style , 2000 .

[40]  Dieter Frey,et al.  Recent Research on Selective Exposure to Information , 1986, Advances in Experimental Social Psychology.

[41]  Diane M. Mackie,et al.  Affect, cognition, and stereotyping: Interactive processes in group perception. , 1993 .

[42]  James J. Gross,et al.  Composure at Any Cost? The Cognitive Consequences of Emotion Suppression , 1999 .

[43]  Bell,et al.  Ambivalence and Persuasion: The Processing of Messages about Immigrant Groups , 1996, Journal of experimental social psychology.

[44]  M. Bradley,et al.  Looking at pictures: affective, facial, visceral, and behavioral reactions. , 1993, Psychophysiology.

[45]  E. Harmon-Jones,et al.  Cognitive dissonance: Progress on a pivotal theory in social psychology. , 1999 .

[46]  P. Lang.  The emotion probe. Studies of motivation and attention. , 1995, The American psychologist.

[47]  A. Lott,et al.  Galvanic skin responses and prejudice. , 1967, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[48]  Norbert Schwarz,et al.  Forming Judgments of Attitude Certainty, Intensity, and Importance: The Role of Subjective Experiences , 1999 .

[49]  R. Thayer.  The Origin of Everyday Moods: Managing Energy, Tension, and Stress , 1996 .

[50]  D. Marlowe,et al.  The Approval Motive: Studies in Evaluative Dependence , 1980 .

[51]  G. Bodenhausen.  Emotions, Arousal, and Stereotypic Judgments: A Heuristic Model of Affect and Stereotyping , 1993 .

[52]  John T. Cacioppo,et al.  The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion , 1986, Advances in Experimental Social Psychology.

[53]  G. Maio,et al.  Expanding the Assessment of Attitude Components and Structure: The Benefits of Open-ended Measures , 2002 .

[54]  D. A. Wilder,et al.  Chapter 5 – The Role of Anxiety in Facilitating Stereotypic Judgments of Outgroup Behavior , 1993 .

[55]  P. Glick,et al.  The Two Faces of Adam: Ambivalent Sexism and Polarized Attitudes Toward Women , 1997 .

[56]  Klaus Jonas,et al.  Attitudinal Ambivalence , 2000 .

[57]  G. Maio,et al.  The utility of open-ended measures to assess intergroup ambivalence , 1996 .

[58]  Walter G. Stephan,et al.  Intergroup Contact: Introduction , 1985 .

[59]  Steven J. Breckler,et al.  A Comparison of Numerical Indexes for Measuring Attitude Ambivalence , 1994 .

[60]  Eliot R. Smith,et al.  Limits on perception of cognitive processes: A reply to Nisbett and Wilson. , 1978 .

[61]  J. Pennebaker.  Confession, Inhibition, and Disease , 1989 .

[62]  D. Paulhus.  Two-component models of socially desirable responding. , 1984 .

[63]  G. Maio,et al.  Examining conflict between components of attitudes: Ambivalence and inconsistency are distinct constructs. , 2000 .

[64]  L. Wheeler,et al.  Review of personality and social psychology , 1980 .

[65]  J. Easterbrook.  The effect of emotion on cue utilization and the organization of behavior. , 1959, Psychological review.

[66]  Peter J. Lang,et al.  Eliciting Affect Using the International Affective Picture System: Trajectories through Evaluative Space , 1998 .

[67]  Russell H. Fazio,et al.  A practical guide to the use of response latency in social psychological research. , 1990 .

[68]  Rupert Brown,et al.  Social Identity Processes: Trends in Theory and Research , 2000 .

[69]  P. Bromer.  AMBIVALENT ATTITUDES AND INFORMATION PROCESSING , 1998 .

[70]  J. N. Bassili.  Meta-judgmental versus operative indexes of psychological attributes: The case of measures of attitude strength. , 1996 .

[71]  M. J. Monteith,et al.  Contemporary Forms of Prejudice-Related Conflict: In Search of a Nutshell , 1996 .

[72]  J. Pennebaker,et al.  The body's response to processing emotional trauma: linking verbal text with autonomic activity. , 1994, Journal of personality.

[73]  J. Dovidio,et al.  Prejudice, Discrimination, and Racism , 1986 .

[74]  Westie Fr,et al.  Autonomic responses and their relationship to race attitudes. , 1959, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[75]  R. Fazio.  Multiple Processes by which Attitudes Guide Behavior: The Mode Model as an Integrative Framework , 1990 .