Interactions among quantitative traits in the course of sympatric speciation

Sympatric speciation, the origin of two or more species from a single local population, has almost certainly been involved in formation of several species flocks, and may be fairly common in nature. The most straightforward scenario for sympatric speciation requires disruptive selection favouring two substantially different phenotypes, and consists of the evolution of reproductive isolation between them followed by the elimination of all intermediate phenotypes. Here we use the hypergeometric phenotypic model to show that sympatric speciation is possible even when fitness and mate choice depend on different quantitative traits, so that speciation must involve formation of covariance between these traits. The increase in the number of variable lociaffecting fitness facilitates sympatric speciation, whereas the increase in the number of variable loci affecting mate choice has the opposite effect. These predictions may enable more cases of sympatric speciation to be identified.

[1]  S. Karlin.  General two-locus selection models: some objectives, results and interpretations. , 1975, Theoretical population biology.

[2]  M. Doebeli.  A quantitative genetic competition model for sympatric speciation , 1996 .

[3]  K. Lackschewitz,et al.  Late Quaternary calcium carbonate sedimentation and terrigenous input along the east Greenland continental margin , 1993 .

[4]  A. Kondrashov.  Multilocus model of sympatric speciation. III. Computer simulations. , 1986, Theoretical population biology.

[5]  C. Darwin.  The Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, Or, The Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life , 1859 .

[6]  Harvey Gould,et al.  Computer simulations , 1990 .

[7]  Alexey S. Kondrashov,et al.  Sympatric speciation: when is it possible? , 1986 .

[8]  J. Felsenstein.  SKEPTICISM TOWARDS SANTA ROSALIA, OR WHY ARE THERE SO FEW KINDS OF ANIMALS? , 1981, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[9]  W. Rice,et al.  LABORATORY EXPERIMENTS ON SPECIATION: WHAT HAVE WE LEARNED IN 40 YEARS? , 1993, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[10]  F. Galis,et al.  Why are there so many cichlid species? , 1998, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[11]  O. Seehausen,et al.  Cichlid Fish Diversity Threatened by Eutrophication That Curbs Sexual Selection , 1997 .

[12]  D. Tautz,et al.  Sympatric speciation suggested by monophyly of crater lake cichlids , 1994, Nature.

[13]  N. Barton.  ON THE SPREAD OF NEW GENE COMBINATIONS IN THE THIRD PHASE OF WRIGHT'S SHIFTING‐BALANCE , 1992, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[14]  O. Seehausen,et al.  The effect of male coloration on female mate choice in closely related Lake Victoria cichlids (Haplochromis nyererei complex) , 1998, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[15]  On the intensity of selection for reproductive isolation at the beginning of sympatric speciation , 1984 .

[16]  Genetic divergence among morphotypes of Lake Tana (Ethiopia) barbs , 1998 .

[17]  G. Wefer,et al.  Late Quaternary paleoceanography in the Fram Strait , 1997 .

[18]  R. D. Ricketts,et al.  Late Pleistocene Desiccation of Lake Victoria and Rapid Evolution of Cichlid Fishes , 1996, Science.

[19]  T. Dokken,et al.  Rapid climatic shifts during isotope stages 2 4 in the Polar North Atlantic , 1996 .

[20]  P. Hogeweg,et al.  Sympatric speciation and extinction driven by environment dependent sexual selection , 1998, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[21]  A. Kondrashov,et al.  On the origin of species by means of assortative mating , 1998, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[22]  Daniel J. Howard,et al.  Endless Forms: Species and Speciation , 1998 .

[23]  R. Lewontin,et al.  Selective mating, assortative mating, and inbreeding: definitions and implications. , 1968, Eugenics quarterly.

[24]  W. Rice,et al.  DISRUPTIVE SELECTION ON HABITAT PREFERENCE AND THE EVOLUTION OF REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION: A SIMULATION STUDY , 1984, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[25]  A. Kondrashov.  Multilocus model of sympatric speciation. I: One character , 1983 .

[26]  M. V. Mina,et al.  Lake Tana large barbs: phenetics, growth and diversification , 1996 .

[27]  APPLICABILITY OF THE HYPERGEOMETRIC PHENOTYPIC MODEL TO HAPLOID AND DIPLOID POPULATIONS , 1999, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[28]  G. Turner,et al.  A model of sympatric speciation by sexual selection , 1995, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[29]  H. Axelrod.  The most complete colored lexicon of cichlids , 1996 .