Effects of carrying methods and box handles on two-person team carrying capacity for females.

This study used a psychophysical approach to examine the effects of carrying methods and the presence or absence of box handles on the maximum acceptable weight carried and resulting responses (heart rate and rating of perceived exertion) in a two-person carrying task. After training, 16 female subjects performed a two-person carrying task at knuckle height for an 8-h work period. Each subject performed 4 different carrying combinations two times. The independent variables were carrying methods (parallel and tandem walking) and box handles (with and without handles). For comparison with two-person carrying, the subjects also performed one-person carrying. The results showed that the maximum acceptable weight carried (MAWC), heart rate (HR), and rating of perceived exertion (RPE) were significantly affected by the presence of box handles. However, the subjects' MAWC, HR, and RPE values were not significantly influenced by the carrying methods. The test-retest reliability of the psychophysical approach was 0.945. The carrying efficiency of two-person carrying was 96.2% of the one-person carrying method. In general, the use of box with handles allows the subjects to carry a higher MAWC (with lower HR and RPE) compared to carrying boxes without handles.

[1]  Yang Gao,et al.  Physiological and perceptual responses in male Chinese workers performing combined manual materials handling tasks , 2009 .

[2]  P. Dempsey,et al.  A critical review of biomechanical, epidemiological, physiological and psychophysical criteria for designing manual materials handling tasks. , 1998, Ergonomics.

[3]  R. Barrett,et al.  Spinal loads during individual and team lifting , 2002, Ergonomics.

[4]  Vincent M Ciriello,et al.  The effects of container size, frequency and extended horizontal reach on maximum acceptable weights of lifting for female industrial workers. , 2007, Applied ergonomics.

[5]  Y H Lee,et al.  The psychophysical lifting capacities of Chinese subjects. , 1995, Ergonomics.

[6]  Stover H. Snook,et al.  Survey of manual handling tasks , 1999 .

[7]  S P Wu,et al.  Psychophysical modelling of lifting capacity of Chinese males using strength variables. , 1993, Applied ergonomics.

[8]  Waldemar Karwowski,et al.  Maximum Load Lifting Capacity of Males and Females in Teamwork , 1988 .

[9]  S. Snook,et al.  Maximum acceptable weight of lift. , 1967, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[10]  A. Ingham,et al.  The Ringelmann effect: Studies of group size and group performance , 1974 .

[11]  Stover H. Snook,et al.  The Ergonomics Society The Society's Lecture 1978. THE DESIGN OF MANUAL HANDLING TASKS , 1978 .

[12]  Robert R Fox.  A psychophysical study of bi-manual lifting , 1982 .

[13]  K P Granata,et al.  Spine loading and trunk kinematics during team lifting. , 1999, Ergonomics.

[14]  S P Wu,et al.  Maximum acceptable weight of lift by Chinese experienced male manual handlers. , 1997, Applied ergonomics.

[15]  A Garg,et al.  Revised NIOSH equation for the design and evaluation of manual lifting tasks. , 1993, Ergonomics.

[16]  W Karwowski,et al.  Isometric and isokinetic testing of lifting strength of males in teamwork. , 1986, Ergonomics.

[17]  Swei-Pi Wu,et al.  Psychophysically determined 1-h load carrying capacity of Chinese females , 2006 .

[18]  K. S. Lee,et al.  A study of efficiency of two-man lifting work , 2001 .

[19]  C G Drury.  Handles for manual materials handling. , 1980, Applied ergonomics.

[20]  Tzu-Hsien Lee.  Maximum Isometric Lifting Strengths of Men in Teamwork , 2004, Hum. Factors.

[21]  S H Snook,et al.  The design of manual handling tasks: revised tables of maximum acceptable weights and forces. , 1991, Ergonomics.

[22]  W Karwowski,et al.  Postural stress analysis in industry. , 1994, Applied ergonomics.

[23]  Rod Barrett,et al.  Spinal Loads During Two-person Team Lifting: Effect of Matched versus Unmatched Standing Height , 2003 .

[24]  Anil Mital,et al.  Manual Materials Handling , 1989 .

[25]  Swei-Pi Wu.  Maximum acceptable weights for asymmetric lifting of Chinese females. , 2003, Applied ergonomics.

[26]  S H Snook,et al.  Psychophysical considerations in permissible loads. , 1985, Ergonomics.

[27]  Marilyn A. Sharp,et al.  Maximum Acceptable Load for Lifting and Carrying in Two-Person Teams , 1995 .

[28]  Swei-Pi Wu,et al.  Psychophysically determined symmetric and asymmetric lifting capacity of Chinese males for one hour's work shifts , 2000 .

[29]  S H Snook,et al.  Further Studies of Psychophysically Determined Maximum Acceptable Weights and Forces , 1993, Human factors.

[30]  Marilyn A. Sharp,et al.  Maximum Lifting Capacity in Single and Mixed Gender Three-Person Teams , 1993 .

[31]  Marilyn A. Sharp,et al.  Effects of Team Size on the Maximum Weight Bar Lifting Strength of Military Personnel , 1997, Hum. Factors.

[32]  W Karwowski,et al.  Testing of isometric and isokinetic lifting strengths of untrained females in teamwork. , 1988, Ergonomics.