Finding Families: Quantitative Methods in Language Classification

Over the past two decades, many of the major controversies in historical linguistics have centred on language classification. Some of these controversies have been concentrated within linguistics, as in the methodological opposition of multilateral comparison to the traditional Comparative Method. Others have crossed discipline boundaries, with the question of whether correlations can be established between language families, archaeological cultures and genetic populations. At the same time, increasing emphasis on language contact has challenged the family tree as a model of linguistic relatedness. This paper argues that we must quantify language classification, to allow objective evaluation of alternative methods within linguistics, and of proposed cross–disciplinary correlations; and that a first step in this quantification is represented by the ‘borrowing’ of computational tools from biology.

[1]  Thomas V. Gamkrelidze,et al.  Indo-European and the Indo-Europeans : a reconstruction and historical analysis of a proto-language and a proto-culture , 1997 .

[2]  G. Barbujani DNA variation and language affinities. , 1997, American journal of human genetics.

[3]  J. Kruskal,et al.  An Indoeuropean classification : a lexicostatistical experiment , 1992 .

[4]  R. McMahon,et al.  LINGUISTICS, GENETICS AND ARCHAEOLOGY: INTERNAL AND EXTERNAL EVIDENCE IN THE AMERIND CONTROVERSY* , 1995 .

[5]  A. L. Kroeber,et al.  Quantitative Classification of Indo-European Languages , 1937 .

[6]  Tandy Warnow,et al.  Indo‐European and Computational Cladistics , 2002 .

[7]  Don Ringe,et al.  How hard is it to match CVC-roots? , 1999 .

[8]  H. Bandelt,et al.  Median-joining networks for inferring intraspecific phylogenies. , 1999, Molecular biology and evolution.

[9]  Russell D. Gray,et al.  Language trees support the express-train sequence of Austronesian expansion , 2000, Nature.

[10]  A. Ross Philological Probability Problems , 1950 .

[11]  Roderic D. M. Page,et al.  TreeView: an application to display phylogenetic trees on personal computers , 1996, Comput. Appl. Biosci..

[12]  M. Swadesh Lexico-Statistical Dating of Prehistoric Ethnic Contacts , 1952 .

[13]  P. Forster,et al.  Phylogenetic star contraction applied to Asian and Papuan mtDNA evolution. , 2001, Molecular biology and evolution.

[14]  L. Excoffier,et al.  Human genetic affinities for Y-chromosome P49a,f/TaqI haplotypes show strong correspondence with linguistics. , 1997, American journal of human genetics.

[15]  P. Sims‐Williams Genetics, linguistics, and prehistory: thinking big and thinking straight , 1998, Antiquity.

[16]  Tandy J. Warnow,et al.  Reconstructing the evolutionary history of natural languages , 1996, SODA '96.

[17]  W. S. Allen RELATIONSHIP IN COMPARATIVE LINGUISTICS , 1953 .

[18]  April McMahon,et al.  Quantifying change over time in phonetics , 2000 .

[19]  Joseph H. Greenberg,et al.  Language in the Americas , 1987 .

[20]  Harry Hoijer,et al.  Lexicostatistics: A Critique , 1956 .

[21]  Sarah G. Thomason,et al.  Contact languages : a wider perspective , 1997 .

[22]  H. Bandelt,et al.  Mitochondrial portraits of human populations using median networks. , 1995, Genetics.

[23]  Linguistics: Talking trees tell tales , 2000, Nature.

[24]  Joseph E. Grimes,et al.  Linguistic Divergence in Romance , 1959 .