View azimuth and zenith, and solar angle effects on wheat canopy reflectance

Abstract Since crop canopies are not lambertian reflectors, their reflectance varies with sun and view positions. It is not always possible or convenient to make reflectance measurements from the nadir position nor at the same time of day. Therefore, ways of estimating nadir reflectance from off-nadir views and for various solar zenith angles are needed. In this study, spectral measurements were made with a Mark II radiometer five times during the day on each of four dates from 15° interval zenith and 45° azimuth positions for wheat canopies during the development interval stem extension to watery ripeness of the grain. The ratio of off-nadir [ R ( Z v , A v )] to nadir [ R (0)] radiance in NIR band (0.76–0.90 μm) was described by the regression equation: R(Z v ,A v ) R(0) = 1.0 + [β 0 + β 1 sin ( A v 2 ) + β 2 (1/ cos Z s )] sin Z v where A v is view azimuth angle relative to the sum position, Z s is solar zenith angle, and Z v is view zenith angle. The coefficient of determination was 0.70 or higher. The equation describes the observations that 1) the ratio of off-nadir to nadir radiance increases or decreases as view zenith angle increases depending on view azimuth angle; backscattering is stronger than forwardscattering and the pattern is azimuthally symmetric about the principal plane of the sun; and 2) the rate of change in the radiance ratio increases with increasing solar zenith angle. The coefficients, β 0 , β 1 and β 2 , changed as the canopies grew. Although the equation needs to be more fully tested, it should help summarize and compare various angular observation data taken in crop fields.

[1]  J. R. Haun Prediction of Spring Wheat Yields from Temperature and Precipitation Data1 , 1974 .

[2]  H. T. Breece Iii,et al.  Bidirectional scattering characteristics of healthy green soybean and corn leaves in vivo. , 1971, Applied optics.

[3]  J. Aase Relationship Between Leaf Area and Dry Matter in Winter Wheat1 , 1978 .

[4]  L. Liotta,et al.  Basement membrane collagen: degradation by migrating endothelial cells. , 1983, Science.

[5]  G. Suits The calculation of the directional reflectance of a vegetative canopy , 1971 .

[6]  Beginning Statistics With Data Analysis , 1984 .

[7]  D. Kimes Dynamics of directional reflectance factor distributions for vegetation canopies. , 1983, Applied optics.

[8]  D S Kimes,et al.  Variation of directional reflectance factors with structural changes of a developing alfalfa canopy. , 1982, Applied optics.

[9]  S. Idso,et al.  Wheat spectral reflectance: interactions between crop configuration, sun elevation, and azimuth angle. , 1979, Applied Optics.

[10]  C J Tucker,et al.  A three-band hand-held radiometer for field use. , 1981, Science.

[11]  Diurnal changes in reflectance factor due to Sun-row direction interactions , 1981 .

[12]  A. Richardson,et al.  Measurement of reflectance factors under daily and intermittent irradiance variations. , 1981, Applied optics.

[13]  Vern C. Vanderbilt,et al.  Soybean canopy reflectance as a function of view and illumination geometry , 1981 .

[14]  Larry Biehl,et al.  Calibration Procedures For Measurement Of Reflectance Factor In Remote Sensing Field Research , 1979, Optics & Photonics.

[15]  R D Jackson,et al.  Plant canopy information extraction from composite scene reflectance of row crops. , 1979, Applied optics.

[16]  E. Lemaster,et al.  Suits reflectance models for wheat and cotton: theoretical and experimental tests. , 1977, Applied optics.

[17]  C. Wiegand,et al.  A seasonal verification of the Suits spectral reflectance model for wheat , 1980 .