Proof of Concept: A PhRMA Position Paper With Recommendations for Best Practice

Proof of concept (POC) may be defined as the earliest point in the drug development process at which the weight of evidence suggests that it is “reasonably likely” that the key attributes for success are present and the key causes of failure are absent. POC is multidimensional but is focused on attributes that, if not addressed, represent a threat to the success of the project in crucial areas such as safety, efficacy, pharmaceutics, and commercial and regulatory issues. The appropriate weight of evidence is assessed through the use of mathematical models and by evaluating the consequences of advancing a candidate drug that is not safe, effective, or commercially viable, vs. failing to advance a candidate that possesses these attributes. Tools for POC include biomarkers, targeted populations, pharmacokinetic (PK)/pharmacodynamic (PD) modeling, simulation, and adaptive study designs. Challenges to the success of POCs include a shortage of skilled personnel, failure to integrate multiple disciplines and information, and the demand made by organizations for certainty.

[1]  J. Wagner Strategic approach to fit-for-purpose biomarkers in drug development. , 2008, Annual review of pharmacology and toxicology.

[2]  I. Kola,et al.  Can the pharmaceutical industry reduce attrition rates? , 2004, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[3]  R. W. Hansen,et al.  The price of innovation: new estimates of drug development costs. , 2003, Journal of health economics.

[4]  P. Sandercock,et al.  Comparison of treatment effects between animal experiments and clinical trials: systematic review , 2006, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[5]  J. DiMasi The Value of Improving the Productivity of the Drug Development Process , 2012, PharmacoEconomics.

[6]  M. Milad,et al.  Model-based development of gemcabene, a new lipid-altering agent , 2005, The AAPS Journal.

[7]  Paul F. Reynolds,et al.  The Role of Modeling and Simulation , 2008 .

[8]  R. Frank,et al.  New estimates of drug development costs. , 2003, Journal of health economics.

[9]  Vikram Sinha,et al.  Pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics and the stages of drug development: Role of modeling and simulation , 2005, The AAPS Journal.

[10]  E. Mohammadi,et al.  Barriers and facilitators related to the implementation of a physiological track and trigger system: A systematic review of the qualitative evidence , 2017, International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.

[11]  L B Sheiner,et al.  Learning versus confirming in clinical drug development , 1997, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[12]  N H Holford,et al.  Simulation of clinical trials. , 2000, Annual review of pharmacology and toxicology.

[13]  Bruce H. Littman,et al.  The ultimate model organism: progress in experimental medicine , 2005, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[14]  M. Heinrich,et al.  An innovative phase I clinical study demonstrates inhibition of FLT3 phosphorylation by SU11248 in acute myeloid leukemia patients. , 2003, Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.

[15]  Stephen A. Williams,et al.  The Value, Qualification, and Regulatory Use of Surrogate End Points in Drug Development , 2009, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[16]  D. DeMets,et al.  Biomarkers and surrogate endpoints: Preferred definitions and conceptual framework , 2001, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.