A two-dimensional deformable phantom for quantitatively verifying deformation algorithms.

PURPOSE The incorporation of deformable image registration into the treatment planning process is rapidly advancing. For this reason, the methods used to verify the underlying deformation algorithms must evolve equally fast. This manuscript proposes a two-dimensional deformable phantom, which can objectively verify the accuracy of deformation algorithms, as the next step for improving these techniques. METHODS The phantom represents a single plane of the anatomy for a head and neck patient. Inflation of a balloon catheter inside the phantom simulates tumor growth. CT and camera images of the phantom are acquired before and after its deformation. Nonradiopaque markers reside on the surface of the deformable anatomy and are visible through an acrylic plate, which enables an optical camera to measure their positions; thus, establishing the ground-truth deformation. This measured deformation is directly compared to the predictions of deformation algorithms, using several similarity metrics. The ratio of the number of points with more than a 3 mm deformation error over the number that are deformed by more than 3 mm is used for an error metric to evaluate algorithm accuracy. RESULTS An optical method of characterizing deformation has been successfully demonstrated. For the tests of this method, the balloon catheter deforms 32 out of the 54 surface markers by more than 3 mm. Different deformation errors result from the different similarity metrics. The most accurate deformation predictions had an error of 75%. CONCLUSIONS The results presented here demonstrate the utility of the phantom for objectively verifying deformation algorithms and determining which is the most accurate. They also indicate that the phantom would benefit from more electron density heterogeneity. The reduction of the deformable anatomy to a two-dimensional system allows for the use of nonradiopaque markers, which do not influence deformation algorithms. This is the fundamental advantage of this verification technique.

[1]  Stephane Cotin,et al.  Truth cube: Establishing physical standards for soft tissue simulation , 2003, Medical Image Anal..

[2]  J M Balter,et al.  Technical note: creating a four-dimensional model of the liver using finite element analysis. , 2002, Medical physics.

[3]  K. Brock,et al.  Accuracy of finite element model-based multi-organ deformable image registration. , 2005, Medical physics.

[4]  Jean-Philippe Thirion,et al.  Image matching as a diffusion process: an analogy with Maxwell's demons , 1998, Medical Image Anal..

[5]  Jerry L. Prince,et al.  Image registration based on boundary mapping , 1996, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[6]  Stephen Breen,et al.  Biomechanical-based image registration for head and neck radiation treatment. , 2010, Physics in medicine and biology.

[7]  James M Balter,et al.  Mutual information based CT registration of the lung at exhale and inhale breathing states using thin-plate splines. , 2004, Medical physics.

[8]  Paul Suetens,et al.  A viscous fluid model for multimodal non-rigid image registration using mutual information , 2003, Medical Image Anal..

[9]  Heinz Handels,et al.  Patient-specific finite element modeling of respiratory lung motion using 4D CT image data. , 2009, Medical physics.

[10]  T. Mackie,et al.  Fast free-form deformable registration via calculus of variations , 2004, Physics in medicine and biology.

[11]  Charles R. Meyer,et al.  Demonstration of accuracy and clinical versatility of mutual information for automatic multimodality image fusion using affine and thin-plate spline warped geometric deformations , 1997, Medical Image Anal..

[12]  Ruzena Bajcsy,et al.  Multiresolution elastic matching , 1989, Comput. Vis. Graph. Image Process..

[13]  L Dong,et al.  Quantification of accuracy of the automated nonlinear image matching and anatomical labeling (ANIMAL) nonlinear registration algorithm for 4D CT images of lung. , 2007, Medical physics.

[14]  Jan Seuntjens,et al.  A deformable phantom for 4D radiotherapy verification: design and image registration evaluation. , 2008, Medical physics.

[15]  Michael Unser,et al.  Fast parametric elastic image registration , 2003, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[16]  Eike Rietzel,et al.  Deformable registration of 4D computed tomography data. , 2006, Medical physics.

[17]  Adil Al-Mayah,et al.  Deformable image registration of heterogeneous human lung incorporating the bronchial tree. , 2010, Medical physics.

[18]  Fred L. Bookstein,et al.  Principal Warps: Thin-Plate Splines and the Decomposition of Deformations , 1989, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[19]  R Mohan,et al.  Quantifying the accuracy of automated structure segmentation in 4D CT images using a deformable image registration algorithm. , 2008, Medical physics.

[20]  Joe Y. Chang,et al.  Validation of an accelerated ‘demons’ algorithm for deformable image registration in radiation therapy , 2005, Physics in medicine and biology.

[21]  Rojano Kashani,et al.  Technical note: a physical phantom for assessment of accuracy of deformable alignment algorithms. , 2007, Medical physics.

[22]  Sarang Joshi,et al.  Large deformation three-dimensional image registration in image-guided radiation therapy , 2005, Physics in medicine and biology.