Global Stereopsis: Cooperative Phenomena in Stereoscopic Depth Perception

In the study of perceptual phenomena the Gestalt psychologists were the first to draw attention to those hierarchical systems for which the whole system is “more” than its constituent parts. By “more” one usually means the emergence of some system behavior that is qualitatively very different from the behavior of the constituent subsystems. In order to obtain such a metamorphosis at a certain hierarchical system level (global level), the subsystems of the previous stage (local level) cannot interact at random but must somehow cooperate.

[1]  B Julesz,et al.  Stereograms portraying ambiguously perceivable surfaces. , 1968, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  B. Julesz,et al.  Spatial-frequency masking in vision: critical bands and spread of masking. , 1972, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[3]  E. W. Bough.  Stereoscopic Vision in the Macaque Monkey: a Behavioural Demonstration , 1970, Nature.

[4]  A. Carmon,et al.  Dominance of the right cerebral hemisphere for stereopsis , 1969 .

[5]  C. WILLIAM TYLER,et al.  Depth perception in disparity gratings , 1974, Nature.

[6]  J. Frisby,et al.  Depth Reduction Effects in Random-Line Stereograms , 1975 .

[7]  C. WILLIAM TYLER,et al.  Stereopsis in dynamic visual noise , 1974, Nature.

[8]  D. Kimura,et al.  Right Hemisphere Specialization for Depth Perception reflected in Visual Field Differences , 1971, Nature.

[9]  J Ross,et al.  Short-term memory in stereopsis. , 1974, Vision research.

[10]  Christopher W. Tyler,et al.  Binocular cross-correlation in time and space , 1978, Vision Research.

[11]  Terry Winograd,et al.  Understanding natural language , 1974 .

[12]  R Sekuler,et al.  Contrast response of human visual mechanismsensitive to orientation and direction of motion. , 1969, Vision research.

[13]  Stephen C. Johnson,et al.  “Mental holography”: Stereograms portraying ambiguously perceivable surfaces , 1968 .

[14]  O Braddick,et al.  Orientation-Specific Learning in Stereopsis , 1973, Perception.

[15]  JOHN Ross,et al.  Stereopsis by binocular delay , 1974, Nature.

[16]  B. Julesz,et al.  Extension of Panum's fusional area in binocularly stabilized vision. , 1967, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[17]  R. Fox,et al.  Stereopsis in the falcon. , 1977, Science.

[18]  D. Fender,et al.  The interaction of color and luminance in stereoscopic vision. , 1972, Investigative ophthalmology.

[19]  G. Poggio,et al.  Binocular interaction and depth sensitivity in striate and prestriate cortex of behaving rhesus monkey. , 1977, Journal of neurophysiology.

[20]  B Julesz,et al.  Binocular Disappearance of Monocular Symmetry , 1966, Science.

[21]  B. Julesz,et al.  Fast determination of stereopsis in rhesus monkey using dynamic random-dot stereograms (A) , 1976 .

[22]  John P. Frisby,et al.  Learning to See Complex Random-Dot Stereograms , 1975 .

[23]  C. Blakemore,et al.  The neural mechanism of binocular depth discrimination , 1967, The Journal of physiology.

[24]  Charles Wheatstone.  On some remarkable and hitherto unobserved phenomena of binocular vision. , 1962 .

[25]  W. Uttal,et al.  Parameters of tachistoscopic stereopsis , 1975, Vision Research.

[26]  B Julesz,et al.  Masking in Visual Recognition: Effects of Two-Dimensional Filtered Noise , 1973, Science.

[27]  B JULESZ,et al.  STEREOPSIS AND BINOCULAR RIVALRY OF CONTOURS. , 1963, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[28]  J I Nelson,et al.  Globality and stereoscopic fusion in binocular vision. , 1975, Journal of theoretical biology.

[29]  P J MacCracken,et al.  Experience and Latency to Achieve Stereopsis: A Replication , 1977, Perceptual and motor skills.

[30]  B. Julesz,et al.  Binocular-Disparity-Dependent Upper—Lower Hemifield Anisotropy and Left—Right Hemifield Isotropy as Revealed by Dynamic Random-Dot Stereograms , 1976, Perception.

[31]  B. Julesz.  Foundations of Cyclopean Perception , 1971 .

[32]  G. Sperling.  Binocular Vision: A Physical and a Neural Theory , 1970 .

[33]  Randolph Blake,et al.  Human Stereopsis: A Psychophysical Approach , 1976 .

[34]  T. Shipley.  Visual Contours in Homogeneous Space , 1965, Science.

[35]  B. Julesz,et al.  Differences between monocular and binocular stroboscopic movement perception. , 1968, Vision research.

[36]  J. Frisby,et al.  The Role of Monocularly Conspicuous Features in Facilitating Stereopsis from Random-Dot Stereograms , 1975 .

[37]  Bela Julesz,et al.  Short-term memory for symmetry , 1976, Vision Research.

[38]  Bela Julesz.  A Cooperative Model of Stereoscopic Depth Perception , 1973 .

[39]  D. Mitchell,et al.  Accuracy of stereoscopic localization of small line segments that differ in size or orientation for the two eyes. , 1972, Vision research.

[40]  W Richards,et al.  Local versus global stereopsis: two mechanisms? , 1974, Vision research.

[41]  Whitman Richards.  FACTORS AFFECTING DEPTH PERCEPTION. , 1970 .

[42]  J. Pettigrew,et al.  Neurons selective for orientation and binocular disparity in the visual Wulst of the barn owl (Tyto alba). , 1976, Science.

[43]  B. Julesz.  Binocular depth perception of computer-generated patterns , 1960 .

[44]  P. O. Bishop.  Neurophysiology of Binocular Single Vision and Stereopsis , 1973 .

[45]  John P. Frisby,et al.  The effect of length differences between corresponding lines on stereopsis from single and multi-line stimuli , 1976, Vision Research.

[46]  R. F. Sarmiento.  The stereoacuity of macaque monkey , 1975, Vision Research.

[47]  B JULESZ,et al.  Binocular Depth Perception without Familiarity Cues , 1964, Science.

[48]  D. Hubel,et al.  Stereoscopic Vision in Macaque Monkey: Cells sensitive to Binocular Depth in Area 18 of the Macaque Monkey Cortex , 1970, Nature.

[49]  L. Kaufman.  Sight and mind : an introduction to visual perception , 1974 .

[50]  B. Julesz.  Cooperative phenomena in binocular depth perception. , 1974, American scientist.

[51]  R. Nebes,et al.  Hemispheric specialization in commissurotomized man. , 1974, Psychological bulletin.

[52]  C. Tyler.  Stereoscopic Tilt and Size Aftereffects , 1975 .

[53]  A. Cowey,et al.  Global Stereopsis in Rhesus Monkeys , 1975, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[54]  C Blakemore,et al.  On the existence of neurones in the human visual system selectively sensitive to the orientation and size of retinal images , 1969, The Journal of physiology.

[55]  M. Sanders.  Handbook of Sensory Physiology , 1975 .

[56]  BELA JULESZ,et al.  Short Term Visual Memory and the Pulfrich Phenomenon , 1969, Nature.

[57]  B Julesz,et al.  Binocular Utilization of Monocular Cues That are Undetectable Monocularly , 1978, Perception.

[58]  D Marr,et al.  Cooperative computation of stereo disparity. , 1976, Science.

[59]  P. O. Bishop,et al.  Inhibitory and sub-liminal excitatory receptive fields of simple units in cat striate cortex. , 1969, Vision research.

[60]  B. Julesz,et al.  Lateralized cortical potentials evoked in humans by dynamic random-dot stereograms , 1978, Vision Research.

[61]  R. Wurtz,et al.  Activity of superior colliculus in behaving monkey. IV. Effects of lesions on eye movements. , 1972, Journal of neurophysiology.

[62]  W. Richards,et al.  Anomalous stereoscopic depth perception. , 1971, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[63]  B. Julesz,et al.  Independent Spatial-Frequency-Tuned Channels in Binocular Fusion and Rivalry , 1975 .

[64]  C. Blakemore,et al.  Stereoscopic Depth Aftereffect Produced without Monocular Cues , 1971, Science.