Manipulating Time Perception of Web Search Users

Time is an important factor in information retrieval studies including search evaluation, user behavior analysis and query understanding. In most of the previous works, time is usually an objective factor measured by timing devices. However, the time perceived by user seems more intuitive to describe the impact of time because search user's opinion is considered subjective. Psychological researches have reported that time perception can be affected by many physical and psychological factors. In this work, a laboratory study with 50 participants was adopted to investigate the impact of Temporal Relevance, e.g., the awareness of elapsed time, on time perception of Web search users. Experimental results show that participants in high temporal relevance environments tend to perceive significantly longer task durations than the actual ones. It shows that the perception of time can be manipulated in Web search scenario and reveals the necessity to take the factor of user perception into consideration in time-related Web search researches such as effort-based evaluation.

[1]  Jason W. Brown Time, Action and Cognition: Towards Bridging the Gap , 1994 .

[2]  Françoise Macar,et al.  Time, action, and cognition : towards bridging the gap , 1992 .

[3]  Mathias Schlögl,et al.  Time Well Spent. , 2018, Journal of palliative medicine.

[4]  Ahmed Hassan Awadallah,et al.  A semi-supervised approach to modeling web search satisfaction , 2012, SIGIR '12.

[5]  S. Droit-Volet,et al.  Emotion and Time Perception: Effects of Film-Induced Mood , 2011, Front. Integr. Neurosci..

[6]  Madalina Sucala,et al.  Psychological Time: Interval Length Judgments and Subjective Passage of Time Judgments , 2011 .

[7]  Leif Azzopardi,et al.  Time Pressure and System Delays in Information Search , 2015, SIGIR.

[8]  Peter Bailey,et al.  User Variability and IR System Evaluation , 2015, SIGIR.

[9]  A. Meyer-Lindenberg,et al.  Age-related changes in midbrain dopaminergic regulation of the human reward system , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[10]  Charles L. A. Clarke,et al.  Time-based calibration of effectiveness measures , 2012, SIGIR '12.

[11]  D. Zakay,et al.  On Prospective Time Estimation, Temporal Relevance and Temporal Uncertainty , 1992 .

[12]  Françoise Macar,et al.  Time, Action and Cognition , 1992 .

[13]  Ryen W. White,et al.  Modeling dwell time to predict click-level satisfaction , 2014, WSDM.

[14]  Ryen W. White,et al.  Time-critical search , 2014, SIGIR.

[15]  S. Grondin Timing and time perception: A review of recent behavioral and neuroscience findings and theoretical directions , 2010, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[16]  Steve Fox,et al.  Evaluating implicit measures to improve web search , 2005, TOIS.

[17]  J H Wearden,et al.  Feeling the Heat: Body Temperature and the Rate of Subjective Time, Revisited , 1995, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. B, Comparative and physiological psychology.

[18]  E. Pöppel Lost in time: a historical frame, elementary processing units and the 3-second window. , 2004, Acta neurobiologiae experimentalis.

[19]  Robert G. Capra,et al.  Time pressure, user satisfaction and task difficulty , 2013, ASIST.

[20]  R. Block,et al.  Prospective and retrospective duration judgments: A meta-analytic review , 1997, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[21]  Ryen W. White,et al.  Understanding web browsing behaviors through Weibull analysis of dwell time , 2010, SIGIR.

[22]  Andreas Albrecht,et al.  From Eternity to Here: The Quest for the Ultimate Theory of Time , 2010 .

[23]  Berkant Barla Cambazoglu,et al.  Impact of response latency on user behavior in web search , 2014, SIGIR.