SCENE: Structural Conversation Evolution NEtwork

It's not just what you say, but it is how you say it. To date, the majority of the Instant Message (IM) analysis and research has focused on the content of the conversation. The main research question has been, `what do people talk about?' focusing on topic extraction and topic modeling. While content is clearly critical for many real-world applications, we have largely ignored identifying `how' people communicate. Conversation structure and communication patterns provide deep insight into how conversations evolve, and how the content is shared. Motivated by theoretical work from psychology and linguistics in the area of conversation alignment, we introduce SCENE, an evolution network approach to extract knowledge from a conversation network. We demonstrate the potential of our approach by taking the task of matching conversation partners. We find that SCENE is more successful because, in contrast to existing approaches, SCENE treats a conversation as an evolving, rather than a static document, and focuses on the structural elements of the conversation instead of being tied to the specific content.

[1]  William M. Pottenger,et al.  Error-Driven Boolean-Logic-Rule-Based Learning for Mining Chatroom Conversations , 2002 .

[2]  Harold Goodglass,et al.  Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examination: Stimulus Cards , 2000 .

[3]  Karrie Karahalios,et al.  ACES: promoting empathy towards aphasia through language distortion emulation software , 2011, CHI.

[4]  René M. Dailey,et al.  Communication Accommodation: Law Enforcement and the Public , 2005 .

[5]  Henry Tirri,et al.  Combining Topic Models and Social Networks for Chat Data Mining , 2004, IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence (WI'04).

[6]  H. Giles,et al.  Communication With People of Different Ages in the Workplace: Thai and American Data , 2006 .

[7]  C M Shewan,et al.  Reliability and validity characteristics of the Western Aphasia Battery (WAB). , 1980, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.

[8]  A. Rouchdy Language contact and language conflict in Arabic : variations on a sociolinguistic theme , 2002 .

[9]  J. Pennebaker,et al.  Linguistic Style Matching in Social Interaction , 2002 .

[10]  Berkant Barla Cambazoglu,et al.  Chat mining: Predicting user and message attributes in computer-mediated communication , 2008, Inf. Process. Manag..

[11]  K. Tracy,et al.  Language and Social Interaction: Its Institutional Identity, Intellectual Landscape, and Discipline‐Shifting Agenda , 2004 .

[12]  James D. Herbsleb,et al.  What is chat doing in the workplace? , 2002, CSCW '02.

[13]  Donald M. Taylor,et al.  Towards a theory of interpersonal accommodation through language: some Canadian data , 1973, Language in Society.

[14]  董瑞国,et al.  Aphasia , 2003, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Human Communication Sciences and Disorders.

[15]  Eiman Elnahrawy,et al.  Log-Based Chat Room Monitoring Using Text Categorization: A Comparative Study , 2002 .

[16]  Gerald P. Delahunty,et al.  The English Language: From Sound to Sense , 2010 .

[17]  Siu Cheung Hui,et al.  Structural analysis of chat messages for topic detection , 2006, Online Inf. Rev..

[18]  James W. Pennebaker,et al.  Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC2007) , 2007 .

[19]  D. Benson,et al.  The neurology of thinking , 1994 .

[20]  Martin J. Pickering,et al.  Alignment as the Basis for Successful Communication , 2006 .

[21]  G. Mcreddie Aphasia , 1868, The Indian medical gazette.