Adaptive Markov Model Analysis for Improving the Design of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles Autopilot

The need for Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) is increasing as they are being used across the world for various civil, defense and aerospace applications such as surveillance, remote sensing, rescue, geographic studies, and security applications. The functionalities provided by the system is based on the system health. Monitoring the health of the system such as healthy, degraded (partially healthy or partially unhealthy) and unhealthy accurately without any impact on safety and security is of utmost importance. Hence in order to monitor the health of the system to provides the functionality for a longer period of time system fault detection and isolation techniques should be incorporated. This paper discusses Fault Detection and Isolation (FDI approach used in Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) autopilot to make its functionality more robust and available for a longer period of time. We proposes an integrated Adaptive Markov Model Analysis (AMMA) to detect and isolate faults in critical components of the system. The effectiveness of the novel approach is demonstrated by simulating the modified system design with FDI incorporation for the UAV autopilot. The proposed FDI approach helps in identifying the gyro sensor failure and provides a degraded mode to the system functionality which did not exist earlier in the design. The simulation demonstrates the system modes such as healthy, degraded (partially healthy or partially unhealthy) and unhealthy to understand the functionality better as the current design which works in only two modes i.e. healthy and unhealthy.

[1]  Mark Stamp,et al.  A Revealing Introduction to Hidden Markov Models , 2017 .

[2]  Lusine Mkrtchyan,et al.  A Bayesian Based Method for Agile Software Development Release Planning and Project Health Monitoring , 2010, 2010 International Conference on Intelligent Networking and Collaborative Systems.

[3]  Peter Seiler,et al.  Worst-case false alarm analysis of fault detection systems , 2014, 2014 American Control Conference.

[4]  Zoubin Ghahramani,et al.  An Introduction to Hidden Markov Models and Bayesian Networks , 2001, Int. J. Pattern Recognit. Artif. Intell..

[5]  Julien Marzat,et al.  Model-based fault diagnosis for aerospace systems: a survey , 2012 .

[6]  M. Grewal,et al.  How Good Is Your Gyro [Ask the Experts] , 2010, IEEE Control Systems.

[7]  Y. Shang The Limit Behavior of a Stochastic Logistic Model with Individual Time-Dependent Rates , 2013 .

[8]  Li Baoan,et al.  Automatic test system for large unmanned aerial vehicle , 2014, 2014 IEEE AUTOTEST.

[9]  L. Rabiner,et al.  An introduction to hidden Markov models , 1986, IEEE ASSP Magazine.

[10]  Youmin Zhang,et al.  A Review on Fault-Tolerant Control for Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) , 2011 .

[11]  Li Xiang,et al.  A survey of intelligent network fault diagnosis technology , 2013, 2013 25th Chinese Control and Decision Conference (CCDC).

[12]  Rolf Isermann,et al.  Supervision, fault-detection and fault-diagnosis methods — An introduction , 1997 .

[13]  Christophe Bérenguer,et al.  Hidden Markov Models for diagnostics and prognostics of systems under multiple deterioration modes , 2014 .

[14]  Sriram Narasimhan,et al.  Combining Model-Based and Feature-Driven Diagnosis Approaches - A Case Study on Electromechanical Actuators , 2010 .

[15]  Yan Wang,et al.  Wavelet Neural Networks for Fault Diagnosis and Prognosis , 2006, 2006 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems.

[16]  Nilesh Kumar,et al.  Identification, Modeling and Control of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles , 2014 .

[17]  Laura L. Pullum,et al.  Software Fault Tolerance Techniques and Implementation , 2001 .

[18]  D. Theilliol,et al.  Robust sensor fault diagnosis and tracking controller for a UAV modelled as LPV system , 2014, 2014 International Conference on Unmanned Aircraft Systems (ICUAS).