Matching Managers to Strategy: Further Tests of the Miles and Snow Typology

This paper integrates prior research on strategic leadership by building on the concept of alignment to explain the performance impact of top managers. Using the Miles and Snow (1978) typology as a theoretical framework, several hypotheses are tested on a sample drawn from three distinct industries. The results show that organizations that are able to achieve an alignment between managerial characteristics and strategic direction perform better than firms where such an alignment is absent. Further, it was found that the strategy-manager match explains a greater proportion of variance in performance than industry membership, organizational age and firm size. Taken together, these findings provide persuasive evidence about the impact that an organization's leaders exert in driving performance outcomes and demonstrates the validity of the administrative dimension of the Miles and Snow typology.

[1]  William H. Glick,et al.  Fit, Equifinality, and Organizational Effectiveness: A Test of Two Configurational Theories , 1993 .

[2]  M. Wiersema,et al.  Top management team turnover as an adaptation mechanism: The role of the environment , 1993 .

[3]  Anisya S. Thomas,et al.  THE PERFORMANCE IMPACT OF STRATEGY - MANAGER COALIGNMENT: AN EMPIRICAL EXAMINATION , 1991 .

[4]  Shaker A. Zahra,et al.  Research Evidence On The Miles-Snow Typology , 1990 .

[5]  S. Shortell,et al.  Perceptual and archival measures of Miles and Snow's strategic types: a comprehensive assessment of reliability and validity. , 1990, Academy of Management journal. Academy of Management.

[6]  S. Slater.  The Influence of Managerial Style on Business Unit Performance , 1989 .

[7]  Warren Boeker,et al.  The Development and Institutionalization of Subunit Power in Organizations. , 1989 .

[8]  Rakesh B. Sambharya.  Managerial Characteristics and MNC Performance. , 1989 .

[9]  T. S. Bateman,et al.  The psychological context of strategic decisions: A model and convergent experimental findings , 1989 .

[10]  Robert G. Lord,et al.  Executive Leadership and Organizational Performance: Suggestions for a New Theory and Methodology , 1988 .

[11]  D. Norburn,et al.  The top management team and corporate performance , 1988 .

[12]  James W. Kolari,et al.  Marketing Strategy Implications of the Miles and Snow Strategic Typology , 1987 .

[13]  Robert M. Grant,et al.  Multinationality and Performance among British Manufacturing Companies , 1987 .

[14]  Shaker A. Zahra.  Research On The Miles-Snow (1978) Typology Of Strategic Orientation: Review, Critique And Future Directions. , 1987 .

[15]  Rakesh B. Sambharya,et al.  Strategic orientation and characteristics of upper management , 1987 .

[16]  C. Prahalad,et al.  The dominant logic: A new linkage between diversity and performance , 1986 .

[17]  Charles R. Schwenk,et al.  Conjectures on Cognitive Simplification in Acquisition and Divestment Decision Making , 1985 .

[18]  David M. Schweiger,et al.  Matching Managers to Strategies: A Review and Suggested Framework , 1984 .

[19]  D. Hambrick,et al.  Upper Echelons: The Organization as a Reflection of Its Top Managers , 1984 .

[20]  Anil K. Gupta,et al.  Business Unit Strategy, Managerial Characteristics, and Business Unit Effectiveness at Strategy Implementation , 1984 .

[21]  D. Hambrick.  Some tests of the effectiveness and functional attributes of Miles and Snow's strategic types. , 1983, Academy of Management journal. Academy of Management.

[22]  S. Kiesler,et al.  Managerial Response to Changing Environments: Perspectives on Problem Sensing from Social Cognition. , 1982 .

[23]  Jae H. Song,et al.  Diversification Strategies and the Experience of Top Executives of Large Firms , 1982 .

[24]  M. K. D. Vries,et al.  Top Executive Locus of Control and Its Relationship to Strategy-Making, Structure, and Environment , 1982 .

[25]  Milton Leontiades,et al.  CHOOSING THE RIGHT MANAGER TO FIT THE STRATEGY , 1982 .

[26]  L. Hosmer.  The importance of strategic leadership. , 1982, The Journal of business strategy.

[27]  J. Kimberly,et al.  Organizational innovation: the influence of individual, organizational, and contextual factors on hospital adoption of technological and administrative innovations. , 1981, Academy of Management journal. Academy of Management.

[28]  Alan G. Sawyer,et al.  Statistical Power and Effect Size in Marketing Research , 1981 .

[29]  C. C. Snow,et al.  Strategy, Distinctive Competence, and Organizational Performance. , 1980 .

[30]  J. G. Wissema,et al.  Strategic management archetypes , 1980 .

[31]  C. Pinder,et al.  The Resurrection of Taxonomy to Aid the Development of Middle Range Theories of Organizational Behavior. , 1979 .

[32]  R E Miles,et al.  Organizational strategy, structure, and process. , 1978, Academy of management review. Academy of Management.

[33]  J. Child.  MANAGERIAL AND ORGANIZATIONAL FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH COMPANY PERFORMANCE PART I , 1974 .

[34]  J. Child.  Organizational Structure, Environment and Performance: The Role of Strategic Choice , 1972 .