Understanding Enzymes as Reporters or Targets in Assays Using Quantitative High-throughput Screening (qHTS)

The U.S. National Institutes of Health Chemical Genomics Center (NCGC) has established a new screening paradigm, quantitative high-throughput screening (qHTS), wherein concentration-response curves (CRCs) are rapidly recorded on large compound collections (> 300,000). The data is automatically fit to the Hill equation and the CRCs are subjected to a classification scheme. This approach reduces false positive and negative rates compared to the traditional screening approaches where only a single concentration is tested and provides a pharmacological database that can be used to construct large-scale bioactivity profiles. We demonstrate how this approach was used to examine a coupled enzyme assay where the production of ATP by human pyruvate kinase M2 (PykM2) was coupled to the ATP-dependent bioluminescent enzyme, firefly luciferase (FLuc), to produce a luminescent signal. This identified chemical probes which specifically activate PykM2 while also providing a bioactivity profile of FLuc inhibitors. Examining the latter uncovered a counterintuitive phenomenon of great importance to compound discovery efforts wherein FLuc inhibitors specifically produce a non-specific luminescent response in cell-based assays.

[1]  O. Feron,et al.  Pyruvate into lactate and back: from the Warburg effect to symbiotic energy fuel exchange in cancer cells. , 2009, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[2]  D. Auld,et al.  Reply to Peltz et al: Post-translational stabilization of the firefly luciferase reporter by PTC124 (Ataluren) , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[3]  S. Peltz,et al.  Nonsense suppression activity of PTC124 (ataluren) , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[4]  Peter G Schultz,et al.  Reprogramming of murine fibroblasts to induced pluripotent stem cells with chemical complementation of Klf4 , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[5]  L. Cantley,et al.  Understanding the Warburg Effect: The Metabolic Requirements of Cell Proliferation , 2009, Science.

[6]  Christopher P Austin,et al.  Identification of pregnane X receptor ligands using time-resolved fluorescence resonance energy transfer and quantitative high-throughput screening. , 2009, Assay and drug development technologies.

[7]  Christopher P Austin,et al.  A basis for reduced chemical library inhibition of firefly luciferase obtained from directed evolution. , 2009, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[8]  D. Auld,et al.  Mechanism of PTC124 activity in cell-based luciferase assays of nonsense codon suppression , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[9]  Eitan Kerem,et al.  Effectiveness of PTC124 treatment of cystic fibrosis caused by nonsense mutations: a prospective phase II trial , 2008, The Lancet.

[10]  James Inglese,et al.  A specific mechanism for nonspecific activation in reporter-gene assays. , 2008, ACS chemical biology.

[11]  Sam Michael,et al.  Compound Management for Quantitative High-Throughput Screening , 2008, JALA.

[12]  Christopher P Austin,et al.  Characterization of chemical libraries for luciferase inhibitory activity. , 2008, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[13]  Ru Wei,et al.  The M2 splice isoform of pyruvate kinase is important for cancer metabolism and tumour growth , 2008, Nature.

[14]  H. Christofk,et al.  Pyruvate kinase M2 is a phosphotyrosine-binding protein , 2008, Nature.

[15]  P. A. Thompson,et al.  Identification of ligand binding by protein stabilization: comparison of ATLAS with biophysical and enzymatic methods. , 2008, Assay and drug development technologies.

[16]  S. Peltz,et al.  PTC124 is an orally bioavailable compound that promotes suppression of the human CFTR-G542X nonsense allele in a CF mouse model , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[17]  Ralph J Deberardinis,et al.  Brick by brick: metabolism and tumor cell growth. , 2008, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[18]  D. Auld,et al.  High Throughput Screening (HTS) Techniques: Overview of Applications in Chemical , 2008 .

[19]  Sam Michael,et al.  Technology Review A Robotic Platform for Quantitative High-Throughput Screening , 2008 .

[20]  R. Deberardinis,et al.  The biology of cancer: metabolic reprogramming fuels cell growth and proliferation. , 2008, Cell metabolism.

[21]  Christopher P Austin,et al.  High-throughput screening assays for the identification of chemical probes. , 2007, Nature chemical biology.

[22]  John S Lazo,et al.  Building a Pharmacological Lexicon: Small Molecule Discovery in Academia , 2007, Molecular Pharmacology.

[23]  Meenal Patel,et al.  PTC124 targets genetic disorders caused by nonsense mutations , 2007, Nature.

[24]  F. Fan,et al.  Bioluminescent assays for high-throughput screening. , 2007, Assay and drug development technologies.

[25]  Christopher P. Austin,et al.  HTS technologies to facilitate chemical genomics , 2007 .

[26]  J. Lazo Roadmap or roadkill: a pharmacologist's analysis of the NIH Molecular Libraries Initiative. , 2006, Molecular interventions.

[27]  Adam Yasgar,et al.  Quantitative high-throughput screening: a titration-based approach that efficiently identifies biological activities in large chemical libraries. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[28]  Ann M Richard,et al.  Chemical structure indexing of toxicity data on the internet: moving toward a flat world. , 2006, Current opinion in drug discovery & development.

[29]  Brian J Eastwood,et al.  A Comparison of Assay Performance Measures in Screening Assays: Signal Window, Z' Factor, and Assay Variability Ratio , 2006, Journal of biomolecular screening.

[30]  Kim E. Garbison,et al.  The Minimum Significant Ratio: A Statistical Parameter to Characterize the Reproducibility of Potency Estimates from Concentration-Response Assays and Estimation by Replicate-Experiment Studies , 2006, Journal of biomolecular screening.

[31]  D. Spring Chemical Genetics to Chemical Genomics: Small Molecules Offer Big Insights , 2005 .

[32]  A. Mesecar,et al.  Structural basis for tumor pyruvate kinase M2 allosteric regulation and catalysis. , 2005, Biochemistry.

[33]  P. Cleveland,et al.  Nanoliter dispensing for uHTS using pin tools. , 2005, Assay and drug development technologies.

[34]  B. Stockwell Exploring biology with small organic molecules , 2004, Nature.

[35]  J Richard Archer,et al.  History, evolution, and trends in compound management for high throughput screening. , 2004, Assay and drug development technologies.

[36]  T. Insel,et al.  NIH Molecular Libraries Initiative , 2004, Science.

[37]  A. Christopoulos,et al.  Fitting Models to Biological Data Using Linear and Nonlinear Regression: A Practical Guide to Curve Fitting , 2004 .

[38]  F. Collins,et al.  A vision for the future of genomics research , 2003, Nature.

[39]  J. Hofmeyr,et al.  Regulating the cellular economy of supply and demand , 2000, FEBS letters.

[40]  T. Noguchi,et al.  Regulation of pyruvate kinase M gene expression. , 1999, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[41]  James N. Weiss The Hill equation revisited: uses and misuses , 1997, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[42]  T. Tanaka,et al.  The L- and R-type isozymes of rat pyruvate kinase are produced from a single gene by use of different promoters. , 1987, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[43]  T. Tanaka,et al.  The M1- and M2-type isozymes of rat pyruvate kinase are produced from the same gene by alternative RNA splicing. , 1986, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[44]  O. Warburg On the origin of cancer cells. , 1956, Science.

[45]  D. Burk,et al.  On respiratory impairment in cancer cells. , 1956, Science.

[46]  A. Hill,et al.  The possible effects of the aggregation of the molecules of haemoglobin on its dissociation curves , 1910 .