Prognostic Value of Residual Tumor Size in Patients With Epithelial Ovarian Cancer FIGO Stages IIA–IV: Analysis of the OVCAD Data

Objective The objective of the study was to evaluate the prognostic impact of residual tumor size after cytoreductive surgery in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer. Methods In this prospective, multicenter study, 226 patients with epithelial ovarian cancer (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stages IIA–IV) were included. Patients were treated with cytoreductive surgery and adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy. Univariate and multivariable survival analyses were performed to investigate the impact of residual tumor size on progression-free and overall survival. Results In 69.4% of patients, surgery resulted in complete tumor resection; minimal residual disease (≤1 cm) was achieved in 87.2% of patients. Advanced tumor stage was associated with a lower rate of complete tumor resection (P < 0.001). After cytoreductive surgery, 3-year overall survival rates were 72.4%, 65.8%, and 45.2% for patients without, with minimal, and with gross residual disease (>1 cm), respectively (P < 0.001). Multivariable survival analysis revealed residual tumor size (P = 0.04) and older patient age (P = 0.02) as independent prognosticators for impaired overall survival. Complete cytoreduction was predictive for a higher rate of treatment response (P = 0.001) and was associated with prolonged progression-free and overall survival (P < 0.001 and P = 0.001). Conclusions The size of residual disease after cytoreduction is one of the most crucial prognostic factors for patients with ovarian cancer. Patients after complete cytoreduction have a superior outcome compared with patients with residual disease. Leaving no residual tumor has to be the aim of primary surgery for ovarian cancer; therefore, patients should receive treatment at centers able to undertake complex cytoreductive procedures.

[1]  D. Flum,et al.  Thirty-Day Mortality After Primary Cytoreductive Surgery for Advanced Ovarian Cancer in the Elderly , 2011, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[2]  I. Zapardiel,et al.  New terminology for cytoreduction in advanced ovarian cancer. , 2011, The Lancet. Oncology.

[3]  D. Levine,et al.  The incidence of major complications after the performance of extensive upper abdominal surgical procedures during primary cytoreduction of advanced ovarian, tubal, and peritoneal carcinomas. , 2010, Gynecologic oncology.

[4]  G. Kenter,et al.  Neoadjuvant chemotherapy or primary surgery in stage IIIC or IV ovarian cancer. , 2010, The New England journal of medicine.

[5]  D. Chi,et al.  The National Cancer Database report on advanced-stage epithelial ovarian cancer: impact of hospital surgical case volume on overall survival and surgical treatment paradigm. , 2010, Gynecologic oncology.

[6]  A. Jemal,et al.  Cancer Statistics, 2010 , 2010, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[7]  Jacobus Pfisterer,et al.  Influence of Residual Tumor on Outcome in Ovarian Cancer Patients With FIGO Stage IV Disease , 2010, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[8]  Jacobus Pfisterer,et al.  Role of surgical outcome as prognostic factor in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: A combined exploratory analysis of 3 prospectively randomized phase 3 multicenter trials , 2009, Cancer.

[9]  P. Sevelda,et al.  Influence of Department Volume on Survival for Ovarian Cancer: Results From a Prospective Quality Assurance Program of the Austrian Association for Gynecologic Oncology , 2009, International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer.

[10]  R. Barakat,et al.  The effect of maximal surgical cytoreduction on sensitivity to platinum-taxane chemotherapy and subsequent survival in patients with advanced ovarian cancer. , 2008, Gynecologic oncology.

[11]  M. Markman Concept of optimal surgical cytoreduction in advanced ovarian cancer: a brief critique and a call for action. , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[12]  Michelle L. Wynn,et al.  Predictors of comprehensive surgical treatment in patients with ovarian cancer , 2007, Cancer.

[13]  D. Levine,et al.  What is the optimal goal of primary cytoreductive surgery for bulky stage IIIC epithelial ovarian carcinoma (EOC)? , 2007, Gynecologic oncology.

[14]  D. French,et al.  Imiquimod treatment of vulvitis circumscripta plasmacellularis , 2006, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.

[15]  Hys Ngan,et al.  Carcinoma of the Ovary , 2003, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.

[16]  G. Rustin,et al.  Use of CA-125 to assess response to new agents in ovarian cancer trials. , 2003, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[17]  D. Chi,et al.  Identification of patient groups at highest risk from traditional approach to ovarian cancer treatment. , 2011, Gynecologic oncology.

[18]  J. Dungan,et al.  Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy or Primary Surgery in Stage IIIC or IV Ovarian Cancer , 2011 .

[19]  S. Rubin,et al.  Tumor residual after surgical cytoreduction in prediction of clinical outcome in stage IV epithelial ovarian cancer: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[20]  P Maisonneuve,et al.  Carcinoma of the ovary. FIGO 26th Annual Report on the Results of Treatment in Gynecological Cancer. , 2006, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.

[21]  E. Trimble,et al.  Survival Effect of Maximal Cytoreductive Surgery for Advanced Ovarian Carcinoma During the Platinum Era: A Meta-Analysis. , 2023, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[22]  N. Dubrawsky Cancer statistics , 1989, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.