Evidence of a Formal Schema in Second Language Comprehension.

Research on discourse comprehension has shown that comprehension is determined not only by the local effects (sentences or paragraphs), but also by the overall organization of a text. Each type of text—e.g., stories, fables, expository and scientific texts—has its own conventional structure; knowledge of these conventions aids listeners or readers in comprehending the text as well as in recalling it later (Kintsch and van Dijk 1975; Meyer 1975; Thorndyke 1977). Following Bartlett (1932), this knowledge has been called a schema, or more specifically, following Carrell (1983a), a formal schema. Recent empirical research has shown the powerful effects of formal schemata in first language comprehension for both adults and children (Mandler and Johnson 1977; Johnson and Mandler 1980). Findings for first language acquirers, children, show that at least by first grade children have acquired story schemata and use them to organize comprehension and recall of stories (Mandler 1978a). Yet, no comparable research has been done to empirically investigate the role of story schemata in second language comprehension. This paper reports an empirical study of the effects of story structure on second language comprehension, specifically reading comprehension in English as a second language. Results indicate that the quantity and temporal sequence of story recall are affected by differences in story structure. The findings are discussed in terms of schema-theoretic approaches to reading and the effects of formal, rhetorical schemata on ESL reading comprehension. The paper concludes with a call for further ESL research in this area.

[1]  B. Meyer.  Use of Top-Level Structure in Text: Key for Reading Comprehension of Ninth-Grade Students. , 1980 .

[2]  C. G. Glenn.  The role of episodic structure and of story length in children's recall of simple stories , 1978 .

[3]  P. Carrell,et al.  Schema Theory and ESL Reading Pedagogy. , 1983 .

[4]  John Hinds,et al.  Contrastive rhetoric: Japanese and English , 1983 .

[5]  Gordon H. Bower,et al.  Experiments on story comprehension and recall , 1978 .

[6]  R. Kaplan.  CULTURAL THOUGHT PATTERNS IN INTER‐CULTURAL EDUCATION , 1966 .

[7]  P. Thorndyke.  Cognitive structures in comprehension and memory of narrative discourse , 1977, Cognitive Psychology.

[8]  N. S. Johnson,et al.  Remembrance of things parsed: Story structure and recall , 1977, Cognitive Psychology.

[9]  W. Kintsch,et al.  Summarizing scrambled stories , 1977, Memory & cognition.

[10]  W. Kintsch,et al.  Comment on se rappelle et on resume des histoires (How We Remember and Summarize Stories). , 1975 .

[11]  Richard C. Anderson,et al.  A cross-cultural perspective on reading comprehension , 1979 .

[12]  Jean M. Mandler,et al.  A tale of two structures: Underlying and surface forms in stories , 1980 .

[13]  Thom Hudson,et al.  The effects of induced schemata on the "short circuit" in L2 reading: Non‐decoding factors in L2 reading performance. , 1982 .

[14]  Mandler JeanM..  A code in the node: The use of a story schema in retrieval , 1978 .

[15]  Patricia Johnson,et al.  Effects on Reading Comprehension of Building Background Knowledge. , 1982 .

[16]  Patricia Johnson,et al.  Effects on Reading Comprehension of Language Complexity and Cultural Background of a Text. , 1981 .

[17]  W. Kintsch,et al.  The role of culture‐specific schemata in the comprehension and recall of stories∗ , 1978 .

[18]  B. Meyer,et al.  The interaction of reader strategies and the organization of text , 1982 .

[19]  M. Cole,et al.  Cross-Cultural Invariance in Story Recall. , 1980 .

[20]  Patricia L. Carrell,et al.  THREE COMPONENTS OF BACKGROUND KNOWLEDGE IN READING COMPREHENSION , 1983 .

[21]  Walter Kintsch,et al.  Toward a model of text comprehension and production. , 1978 .

[22]  Ulla Connor,et al.  Cross-cultural Differences and Perceived Quality in Written Paraphrases of English Expository Prose , 1983 .

[23]  Patricia L. Carrell,et al.  SOME ISSUES IN STUDYING THE ROLE OF SCHEMATA, OR BACKGROUND KNOWLEDGE, IN SECOND LANGUAGE COMPREHENSION , 1983 .