The German Naturalistic Cycling Study – Comparing cycling speed of riders of different e-bikes and conventional bicycles

In recent years, the number of electric bicycles on European, American and especially Chinese roads has increased substantially. Today, 11% of all bicycles sold in Germany are e-bikes. Given their potential to reach higher maximum speeds, concerns have been raised about a possible increase in crash risk associated with e-bike use. However, as of now, it is unclear if and how often the potentially higher speed is actually reached in everyday cycling. As part of the German Naturalistic Cycling study we measured and compared the speed of three bicycle types (conventional bicycles, pedelecs (pedalling supported up to 25 km/h), S-pedelecs (pedalling supported up to 45 km/h)) under naturalistic conditions. Ninety participants, divided in three age groups, took part in our study. Participants used their own bikes or e-bikes. The bicycles were equipped with a data acquisition system, which included sensors to record speed and distance, as well as two cameras. Data was collected over a period of four weeks for each participant. Nearly 17,000 kilometres of cycling were recorded in total. The statistical analysis revealed significant differences in mean speed between all three bicycle types. Pedelec riders were, on average, 2 km/h faster than cyclists. S-pedelec speed was even 9 km/h higher. A similar pattern was also found when analysing free flow conditions and uphill or downhill cycling separately. The highest speed was measured on road and bicycle infrastructure, regardless of bicycle type. Participants aged over 65 years rode significantly slower than younger participants. Data on acceleration from standstill largely confirm the differences between bicycle types and age groups. The results show that electric bicycles indeed reach higher speeds than conventional bicycles regularly. Although it is unclear if this also leads to an increase in crash risk, it can be assumed that the consequences of a crash might be, on average, more severe.

[1]  Christopher R. Cherry,et al.  Use characteristics and mode choice behavior of electric bike users in China , 2007 .

[2]  Marco Dozza,et al.  Introducing naturalistic cycling data: What factors influence bicyclists’ safety in the real world? , 2014 .

[3]  Jennifer Dill,et al.  Understanding and Measuring Bicycling Behavior: a Focus on Travel Time and Route Choice , 2008 .

[4]  Suzanne E. Lee,et al.  A COMPREHENSIVE EXAMINATION OF NATURALISTIC LANE-CHANGES , 2004 .

[5]  Louise Gustafsson,et al.  A naturalistic study of commuter cyclists in the greater Stockholm area. , 2013, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[6]  Katja Schleinitz,et al.  Pedelec-Naturalistic Cycling Study , 2014 .

[7]  Christopher R. Cherry,et al.  Electric Two-Wheelers in China: Analysis of Environmental, Safety, and Mobility Impacts , 2007 .

[8]  Stuart Newstead,et al.  Naturalistic cycling study: identifying risk factors for on-road commuter cyclists. , 2010, Annals of advances in automotive medicine. Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine. Annual Scientific Conference.

[9]  Florian Michahelles,et al.  Inferring usage characteristics of electric bicycles from position information , 2010, LocWeb '10.

[10]  D. Wittowsky,et al.  Einstellungsorientierte Akzeptanzanalyse zur Elektromobilität im Fahrradverkehr , 2014 .

[11]  Maya Siman-Tov,et al.  Bicycle injuries: a matter of mechanism and age , 2010, Injury Prevention.

[12]  Lorann Stallones,et al.  Trends in Electric Bike–Related Injury in China, 2004-2010 , 2015, Asia-Pacific journal of public health.

[13]  Brian Casey Langford,et al.  Risky riding: Naturalistic methods comparing safety behavior from conventional bicycle riders and electric bike riders. , 2015, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[14]  Chong Zhang,et al.  Electric-bicycle-related injury: a rising traffic injury burden in China , 2010, Injury Prevention.

[15]  Helene Amundsen,et al.  Speed and road accidents , 2015 .

[16]  Reinhard Jellinek,et al.  MERKUR - Auswirkungen der Entwicklung des Marktes fuer E-Fahrraeder auf Risiken, Konflikte und Unfaelle auf Radinfrastrukturen , 2013 .

[17]  Ingrid van Schagen,et al.  Driving speed and the risk of road crashes: a review. , 2006, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[18]  Lukas Ackermann,et al.  Baloise Group - Sicherheitsstudie 2010 : Gefahren und Risikofaktoren beim Fahrradfahren in der Schweiz, Belgien, Österreich, Deutschland, Luxemburg und Kroatien , 2010 .

[19]  Weixu Wang,et al.  Comparative analysis of the safety effects of electric bikes at signalized intersections , 2013 .

[20]  Min He,et al.  Alternative Methods of Measuring Operating Speed of Electric and Traditional Bikes in China-Implications for Travel Demand Models , 2010 .

[21]  D J Wium,et al.  Speed and road accidents , 1968 .

[22]  Mingwei He,et al.  Comparison Study on Operating Speeds of Electric Bicycles and Bicycles , 2008 .

[23]  Julie McClafferty,et al.  Chapter 6 – Naturalistic Driving Studies and Data Coding and Analysis Techniques , 2011 .

[24]  Kay W. Axhausen,et al.  Route choice of cyclists in Zurich , 2010 .

[25]  Geoffrey Rose,et al.  E-bikes and urban transportation: emerging issues and unresolved questions , 2012 .

[26]  D. Thompson,et al.  Bike speed measurements in a recreational population: validity of self reported speed. , 1997, Injury prevention : journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention.