DIAGNOSIS OF DEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITIES FOR REFRIGERATION SOCIO-TECHNICAL SYSTEM USING THE RADICAL INNOVATION DESIGN METHODOLOGY

Abstract A refrigerant system (like that of a supermarket) is a complex system if we consider all the stakeholders throughout its lifecycle phases (use, maintenance, technological update, end of life). The lack of stakeholders' interaction during the design and other lifecycle stages of such a system generates issues and leads to sub-optimal system performances. We used the RID methodology to identify the main areas for improvement for these activities related to the refrigerant system. It is precisely designed to analyze, within the scope of activity, the major stakeholders' problems (user profiles) during lifecycle phases (use situations) to deduce areas for improvement (value buckets). Therefore, we built a process of interviews and data collection on existing practices to feed into a RID model. The first results are an archetypal description of the actors and problems encountered according to the lifecycle phases. The second part is a prioritized mapping of the areas to improve despite a certain number of known available solutions but proven insufficient.

[1]  Bernard Yannou,et al.  Ecodesign tools in the construction sector: analyzing usage inadequacies with designers' needs , 2017 .

[2]  Andrea Trianni,et al.  Industrial sustainability performance measurement systems: A novel framework , 2019, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[3]  Bernard Yannou,et al.  CATEGORIZING USERS PAINS, USAGE SITUATIONS AND EXISTING SOLUTIONS IN FRONT END OF INNOVATION: THE CASE OF SMART LIGHTING PROJECT , 2017 .

[4]  D. Leducq,et al.  Experimental investigation of the use of PCM in an open display cabinet for energy management purposes , 2019, Energy Conversion and Management.

[5]  Pertti Saariluoma,et al.  Explaining failures in innovative thought processes in engineering design , 2012 .

[6]  Kostadin Fikiin,et al.  Assessment of methods to reduce the energy consumption of food cold stores , 2014 .

[7]  Luis Rosario,et al.  Analysis of energy savings in a supermarket refrigeration/HVAC system , 2012 .

[8]  Romain Farel,et al.  Capturing the relevant problems leading to pain- and usage-driven innovations: The Dependency Structure Modeling Value Bucket algorithm , 2016, Concurr. Eng. Res. Appl..

[9]  R. Schaeffer,et al.  Energy sector vulnerability to climate change: A review , 2012 .

[10]  Fulvio Ardente,et al.  Analysis of end-of-life treatments of commercial refrigerating appliances: Bridging product and waste policies , 2015 .

[11]  Brigitte Moench,et al.  Engineering Design A Systematic Approach , 2016 .

[12]  Ingrid Mignon,et al.  System- and actor-level challenges for diffusion of renewable electricity technologies: an international comparison , 2016 .

[14]  Bernard Yannou,et al.  Usage-driven problem design for radical innovation in healthcare , 2017, BMJ Innovations.

[15]  Antti Saaksvuori,et al.  Product lifecycle management , 2004 .

[16]  Savvas A. Tassou,et al.  Performance evaluation and optimal design of supermarket refrigeration systems with supermarket model "SuperSim", Part I: Model description and validation , 2011 .

[17]  Ciro Aprea,et al.  An experimental evaluation of the greenhouse effect in the substitution of R134a with CO2 , 2012 .

[18]  K. Srinivasan,et al.  Assessment of total equivalent warming impact (TEWI) of supermarket refrigeration systems , 2017 .

[19]  Marija Jankovic,et al.  Observations From Radical Innovation Projects Considering the Company Context , 2013 .

[20]  M. Kolokotroni,et al.  Supermarket Energy Use in the UK , 2019, Energy Procedia.

[21]  R. Mauborgne,et al.  Value innovation: a leap into the blue ocean , 2005 .

[22]  Bernard Yannou,et al.  SUPPORTING NEED SEEKER INNOVATION: THE RADICAL INNOVATION DESIGN METHODOLOGY , 2015 .