Using Enterprise Models to Explain and Discuss Autopoiesis and Homeostasis in Socio-technical Systems

The article links two seemingly different fundamental theoretical concepts of autopoiesis and homeostasis and tries to apply them to the realm of socio-technical systems with the use of the Fractal Enterprise Model (FEM). Autopoiesis is the property of a system that constantly reproduces itself. Homeostasis describes a way a complex system constantly maintains its identity while adapting to changes in its internal and external environment. To be able to use FEM for this task, the original version of FEM has been extended by adding special elements for representing the system's context – part of the environment to which the system is structurally coupled. The approach taken in this article differs from other works in the same field in having the focus on the “body” (concrete elements being reproduced) of the socio-technical system, as well as on identifying concrete processes that reproduce the system, and demonstrating concrete ways of how a specific system adapts or can adapt to the perturbations in the environment (i.e. internal and external disturbances that affect the system).

[1]  Ilia Bider,et al.  Using Fractal Enterprise Model to Assist Complexity Management , 2018, BIR Workshops.

[2]  Steffen Blaschke.  Chapter 12 The Autopoiesis of Organizational Knowledge, Learning, and Memory , 2010 .

[3]  Alain Wegmann,et al.  What We Can Learn about Business Modeling from Homeostasis , 2012, BMSD.

[4]  E. R. Hammer.  Research in Organizational Behavior , 1984 .

[5]  Steven L. Alter,et al.  The Work System Method: Connecting People, Processes, and IT for Business Results , 2006 .

[6]  Robert P. Bostrom,et al.  Mis problems and failures: a socio-technical perspective , 1977 .

[7]  Alain Wegmann,et al.  Modelling the regulative role of business processes with use and misuse cases , 2005, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[8]  G. Regev,et al.  A Regulation-Based View on Business Process and Supporting System Flexibility , 2005 .

[9]  Ilia Bider,et al.  Using Structural Coupling Approach for Defining and Maintaining Identity of an Educational Institution. Experience Report , 2018, STPIS@CAiSE.

[10]  Kuldeep Kumar,et al.  Business process flexibility through the exploration of stimuli , 2008, Int. J. Bus. Process. Integr. Manag..

[11]  M. Diamond.  Organizational Identity , 1988 .

[12]  Thomas H. Davenport,et al.  The New Industrial Engineering: Information Technology and Business Process Redesign , 2011 .

[13]  Michael Hammer,et al.  Reengineering Work: Don’t Automate, Obliterate , 1990 .

[14]  H. Maturana,et al.  Autopoiesis: the organization of living systems, its characterization and a model. , 1974, Currents in modern biology.

[15]  H. Cadenas,et al.  The Autopoiesis of Social Systems and its Criticisms , 2015 .

[16]  Ilia Bider,et al.  Linking Autopoiesis to Homeostasis in Socio-Technical Systems , 2019, STPIS@ECIS.

[17]  R. Vanderstraeten.  The autopoiesis of social systems , 2014 .

[18]  Nathaniel Virgo.  The necessity of extended autopoiesis , 2020, Adapt. Behav..

[19]  Ilia Bider,et al.  Using a Socio-Technical Systems Approach for a Sales Process Improvement , 2018, 2018 IEEE 22nd International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Workshop (EDOCW).

[20]  Ilia Bider,et al.  A fractal enterprise model and its application for business development , 2017, Software & Systems Modeling.

[21]  W. Pitts,et al.  What the Frog's Eye Tells the Frog's Brain , 1959, Proceedings of the IRE.

[22]  G. Zajicek,et al.  The Wisdom of the Body , 1934, Nature.

[23]  Ilia Bider,et al.  Evaluating Usefulness of a Fractal Enterprise Model Experience Report , 2019, BPMDS/EMMSAD@CAiSE.

[24]  David A. Whetten,et al.  Albert and Whetten Revisited: Strengthening the Concept of Organizational Identity , 2006 .

[25]  David Simms,et al.  The Heart of Enterprise , 1980 .

[26]  Ilia Bider,et al.  Defining Transformational Patterns for Business Model Innovation , 2018, BIR.

[27]  Ilia Bider,et al.  Defining business process flexibility with the help of invariants , 2007, Softw. Process. Improv. Pract..

[28]  Cecilia Haskins.  A Journey Through The Systems Landscape , 2014 .

[29]  W. Cannon.  ORGANIZATION FOR PHYSIOLOGICAL HOMEOSTASIS , 1929 .