Is there something quantum-like about the human mental lexicon?

Abstract Following an early claim by Nelson and McEvoy suggesting that word associations can display ‘spooky action at a distance behaviour’, a serious investigation of the potentially quantum nature of such associations is currently underway. In this paper quantum theory is proposed as a framework suitable for modelling the human mental lexicon, specifically the results obtained from both intralist and extralist word association experiments. Some initial models exploring this hypothesis are discussed, and experiments capable of testing these models proposed.

[1]  Michael N Jones,et al.  Representing word meaning and order information in a composite holographic lexicon. , 2007, Psychological review.

[2]  D L Nelson,et al.  One step is not enough: Making better use of association norms to predict cued recall , 1997, Memory & cognition.

[3]  Joshua B. Tenenbaum,et al.  The Large-Scale Structure of Semantic Networks: Statistical Analyses and a Model of Semantic Growth , 2001, Cogn. Sci..

[4]  Dov M. Gabbay,et al.  Handbook of Quantum logic and Quantum Structures , 2007 .

[5]  Thomas A. Schreiber,et al.  Processing implicit and explicit representations. , 1992, Psychological review.

[6]  Diederik Aerts,et al.  Toward an Ecological Theory of Concepts , 2008, 0803.2567.

[7]  Andrei Khrennikov,et al.  Interpretations of Probability , 1999 .

[8]  Thomas A. Schreiber,et al.  Sentence encoding and implicitly activated memories , 1992, Memory & cognition.

[9]  E. Schrödinger.  Die gegenwärtige Situation in der Quantenmechanik , 1935, Naturwissenschaften.

[10]  D. Nelson,et al.  Experiencing a word can prime its accessibility and its associative connections to related words , 2002, Memory & cognition.

[11]  J. Bell,et al.  Speakable and Unspeakable in Quatum Mechanics , 1988 .

[12]  Ray Pike,et al.  Global matching: A comparison of the SAM, Minerva II, Matrix, and TODAM models. , 1989 .

[13]  Terry Dartnall,et al.  Artificial Intelligence and Creativity , 1994 .

[14]  Douglas L. Nelson,et al.  Implicit Memory and Inhibition , 1993 .

[15]  A. Zeilinger.  Experiment and the Foundations of Quantum Physics , 1999 .

[16]  Thomas A. Schreiber,et al.  The University of South Florida free association, rhyme, and word fragment norms , 2004, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[17]  Peter Bruza,et al.  Quantum Logic of Semantic Space: An Exploratory Investigation of Context Effects in Practical Reasoning , 2005, We Will Show Them!.

[18]  Douglas L. Nelson,et al.  Is the Concreteness Effect a Result of Underlying Network Interconnectivity , 1999 .

[19]  J. Bell,et al.  Six possible worlds of quantum mechanics , 1992 .

[20]  Lise Abrams,et al.  Free associations and dominance ratings of homophones for young and older adults , 2004, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[21]  Albert Einstein,et al.  Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete? , 1935 .

[22]  Douglas L. Nelson,et al.  Entangled Associative Structures and Context , 2007, AAAI Spring Symposium: Quantum Interaction.

[23]  Donald A. Sofge,et al.  Quantum Interaction: Proceedings of the Second Quantum Interaction Symposium - Qi-2008 , 2008 .

[24]  Donald A. Sofge,et al.  Quantum interaction : Papers from the AAAI Spring Symposium : Technical Report SS-07-08 , 2007 .

[25]  Diederik Aerts,et al.  Contextualizing concepts using a mathematical generalization of the quantum formalism , 2002, J. Exp. Theor. Artif. Intell..

[26]  F. Laloë,et al.  Do we really understand quantum mechanics? Strange correlations, paradoxes, and theorems , 2001, quant-ph/0209123.

[27]  Allan Collins,et al.  A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing , 1975 .

[28]  Joseph P. Zbilut,et al.  Some remarks on an experiment suggesting quantum-like behavior of cognitive entities and formulation of an abstract quantum mechanical formalism to describe cognitive entity and its dynamics , 2007 .

[29]  Dominic Widdows,et al.  Geometry and Meaning , 2004, Computational Linguistics.

[30]  Kirsty Kitto,et al.  High end complexity , 2008, Int. J. Gen. Syst..

[31]  Peter Bruza,et al.  Quantum Information Dynamics and Open World Science , 2007, AAAI Spring Symposium: Quantum Interaction.

[32]  Douglas L. Nelson,et al.  Spreading activation or spooky action at a distance , 2003 .

[33]  Michael Gabbay,et al.  We Will Show Them: Essays in Honour of Dov Gabbay, Vol. 1 , 2005 .

[34]  Diederik Aerts,et al.  A case for applying an abstracted quantum formalism to cognition , 2011 .

[35]  Diederik Aerts,et al.  The Violation of Bell Inequalities in the Macroworld , 2000, quant-ph/0007044.

[36]  L. Ballentine.  Quantum mechanics : a modern development , 1998 .

[37]  G. Vitiello.  My double unveiled , 2001 .

[38]  Diederik Aerts,et al.  A Theory of Concepts and Their Combinations II: A Hilbert Space Representation , 2004 .

[39]  Douglas L. Nelson,et al.  Encoding context and set size. , 1979 .

[40]  A. Shimony,et al.  Proposed Experiment to Test Local Hidden Variable Theories. , 1969 .

[41]  M. Humphreys,et al.  Different Ways to Cue a Coherent Memory System: A Theory for Episodic, Semantic, and Procedural Tasks. , 1989 .

[42]  Douglas L. Nelson,et al.  Interpreting the influence of implicitly activated memories on recall and recognition. , 1998 .