Hydrologic behavior of model slopes with synthetic water repellent soils

In the natural environment, soil water repellency decreases infiltration, increases runoff, and increases erosion in slopes. In the built environment, soil water repellency offers the opportunity to develop granular materials with controllable wettability for slope stabilization. In this paper, the influence of soil water repellency on the hydrological response of slopes is investigated. Twenty-four flume tests were carried out in model slopes under artificial rainfall; soils with various wettability levels were tested, including wettable (Contact Angle, CA 90°). Various rainfall intensities (30 mm/h and 70 mm/h), slope angles (20° and 40°) and relative compactions (70% and 90%) were applied to model the response of natural and man-made slopes to rainfall. To quantitatively assess the hydrological response, a number of measurements were made: runoff rate, effective rainfall rate, time to ponding, time to steady state, runoff acceleration, total water storage and wetting front rate. Overall, an increase in soil water repellency reduces infiltration and shortens the time for runoff generation, with the effects amplified for high rainfall intensity. Comparatively, the slope angle and relative compaction had only a minor contribution to the slope hydrology. The subcritical water repellent soils sustained infiltration for longer than both the wettable and water repellent soils, which presents an added advantage if they are to be used in the built environment as barriers. This study revealed substantial impacts of man-made or synthetically induced soil water repellency on the hydrological behavior of model slopes in controlled conditions. The results shed light on our understanding of hydrological processes in environments where the occurrence of natural soil water repellency is likely, such as slopes subjected to wildfires and in agricultural and forested slopes.

[1]  A. Jordán,et al.  Intact ash and charred litter reduces susceptibility to rain splash erosion post‐wildfire , 2009 .

[2]  Pute Wu,et al.  Effects of rainfall intensity, underlying surface and slope gradient on soil infiltration under simulated rainfall experiments , 2013 .

[3]  J. Moody,et al.  Synthesis of soil‐hydraulic properties and infiltration timescales in wildfire‐affected soils , 2017 .

[4]  J. Moody,et al.  Hydrologic conditions controlling runoff generation immediately after wildfire , 2012 .

[5]  S. Lourenço,et al.  Hysteresis in the Soil Water Retention of a Sand–Clay Mixture with Contact Angles Lower than Ninety Degrees , 2015 .

[6]  J. E. Gartner,et al.  Storm rainfall conditions for floods and debris flows from recently burned areas in southwestern Colorado and southern California , 2008 .

[7]  O. Planchon,et al.  Soil crusting and infiltration on steep slopes in northern Thailand , 2003 .

[8]  T. M. Chui,et al.  Synthetic Water Repellent Soils for Slope Stabilization , 2017 .

[9]  W. Kruskal,et al.  Use of Ranks in One-Criterion Variance Analysis , 1952 .

[10]  J. Bardet,et al.  Permeability and compressibility of wax-coated sands , 2014 .

[11]  L. Debano Water repellent soils: a state-of-the-art , 1981 .

[12]  D. Eckersley,et al.  Instrumented laboratory flowslides , 1990 .

[13]  Louis W. Dekker,et al.  Water repellency of sieve fractions from sandy soils and relationships with organic material and soil structure , 1993 .

[14]  L. Debano Water repellency in soils: a historical overview , 2000 .

[15]  M. H. Diskin,et al.  Ponding time and infiltration capacity variation during steady rainfall , 1996 .

[16]  K. Hartge,et al.  Development and application of a new sessile drop contact angle method to assess soil water repellency , 2000 .

[17]  R. Gunn,et al.  THE TERMINAL VELOCITY OF FALL FOR WATER DROPLETS IN STAGNANT AIR , 1949 .

[18]  Lawrence R. Parsons,et al.  Performance of a New Capacitance Soil Moisture Probe in a Sandy Soil , 2009 .

[19]  V. Chaplot,et al.  Field measurements of interrill erosion under ­different slopes and plot sizes , 2000 .

[20]  D. Scott,et al.  Soil wettability in forested catchments in South Africa; as measured by different methods and as affected by vegetation cover and soil characteristics , 2000 .

[21]  L. Kurukulasuriya,et al.  Characterization of water repellency for hydrophobized grains with different geometries and sizes , 2015, Environmental Earth Sciences.

[22]  T. Kamai,et al.  Processes in model slopes made of mixtures of wettable and water repellent sand: Implications for the initiation of debris flows in dry slopes , 2015 .

[23]  C. Ritsema,et al.  Preferential flow in water repellent sandy soils: principles and modeling implications , 2000 .

[24]  D. Leelamanie,et al.  Time dependence of contact angle and its relation to repellency persistence in hydrophobized sand , 2009 .

[25]  Rodney B. Thompson,et al.  Salinity Effects on Soil Moisture Measurement Made with a Capacitance Sensor , 2007 .

[26]  Norbert Silvera,et al.  Impact of slope gradient on soil surface features and infiltration on steep slopes in northern Laos , 2011 .

[27]  Peter R. Robichaud,et al.  Fire effects on infiltration rates after prescribed fire in Northern Rocky Mountain forests, USA , 2000 .

[28]  Peter Wallbrink,et al.  Effects of differing wildfire severities on soil wettability and implications for hydrological response , 2006 .

[29]  L. Carter,et al.  Infiltration Rate of a Sandy Loam Soil: Effects of Traffic, Tillage, and Plant Roots , 1992 .

[30]  Louise E. Ashmun,et al.  Infiltration and interrill erosion rates after a wildfire in western Montana, USA , 2016 .

[31]  Kyoji Sassa,et al.  Factors affecting rainfall-induced flowslides in laboratory flume tests , 2001 .

[32]  T. Dunne,et al.  Effects of Rainfall, Vegetation, and Microtopography on Infiltration and Runoff , 1991 .

[33]  F. Darboux,et al.  Effects of fire‐induced water repellency on soil aggregate stability, splash erosion, and saturated hydraulic conductivity for different size fractions , 2007 .

[34]  S. Doerr,et al.  Effects of hydrophobicity on splash erosion of model soil particles by a single water drop impact , 2013 .

[35]  H. R. Pruppacher,et al.  Acceleration to Terminal Velocity of Cloud and Raindrops , 1977 .

[36]  A. Vaezi,et al.  Contribution of raindrop impact to the change of soil physical properties and water erosion under semi-arid rainfalls. , 2017, The Science of the total environment.

[37]  S. Doerr On standardizing the ‘Water Drop Penetration Time’ and the ‘Molarity of an Ethanol Droplet’ techniques to classify soil hydrophobicity: A case study using medium textured soils , 1998 .

[38]  J. T. Douglas,et al.  Millimeter-scale spatial variability in soil water sorptivity: scale, surface elevation, and subcritical repellency effects , 2004 .

[39]  P. W. Li,et al.  Short-range quantitative precipitation forecasting in Hong Kong , 2004 .

[40]  S. Lourenço,et al.  Wettability of crushed air-dried minerals , 2015 .

[41]  Makoto Nishigaki,et al.  Laboratory rainfall-induced slope failure with moisture content measurement , 2007 .

[42]  H. Choo,et al.  Engineering Characteristics of Chemically Treated Water-Repellent Kaolin , 2016, Materials.

[43]  S. Doerr,et al.  Transitions of water‐drop impact behaviour on hydrophobic and hydrophilic particles , 2013 .

[44]  P. Pereira,et al.  Wettability of ash conditions splash erosion and runoff rates in the post-fire. , 2016, The Science of the total environment.

[45]  S. Doerr,et al.  Water retention of repellent and subcritical repellent soils: New insights from model and experimental investigations , 2010 .

[46]  Jason W. Kean,et al.  A low‐cost method to measure the timing of postfire flash floods and debris flows relative to rainfall , 2012 .

[47]  Min Li,et al.  Water Repellency of Monument Soil Treated by Tung Oil , 2016, Geotechnical and Geological Engineering.

[48]  Peter Lumb,et al.  The Residual Soils of Hong Kong , 1965 .

[49]  J. Parlange,et al.  Preferential flow as a potential mechanism for fire‐induced increase in streamflow , 2014 .

[50]  S. Lourenço,et al.  Conditions to induce water repellency in soils with dimethyldichlorosilane , 2016 .

[51]  D. Scott Soil wettability in forested catchments in South Africa , 2003 .

[52]  Kyoji Sassa,et al.  Failure process and hydrologic response of a two layer physical model: Implications for rainfall-induced landslides , 2006 .

[53]  G. Frasier,et al.  Creating Hydrophobic Soil for Water Harvesting , 1969 .

[54]  J. Ayars,et al.  Calibration of capacitance probe sensors in a saline silty clay soil , 2004 .

[55]  T. Yun,et al.  Water‐Entry Pressure and Friction Angle in an Artificially Synthesized Water‐Repellent Silty Soil , 2015 .

[56]  S. Lourenço,et al.  A Semi-Automated Technique for Repeatable and Reproducible Contact Angle Measurements in Granular Materials using the Sessile Drop Method , 2017 .

[57]  R. Iverson,et al.  Friction in Debris Flows: Inferences from Large-scale Flume Experiments , 1993 .

[58]  R. Bryan,et al.  The influence of slope angle on final infiltration rate for interrill conditions , 1997 .