A Multiple‐Data Analysis of the 3.5‐Year Development of EFL Student Writers

The present study investigated the changes in Japanese students’ English writing behaviors over a 3.5-year period using multiple data sources including written texts, videotaped writing behaviors, and stimulated-recall protocols. Data from student interviews supplemented the analyses. Because 6 (henceforth, English as a second language [ESL] students) out of the 11 participants spent 2 to 8 months in English-speaking environments, the study was also able to examine the effects of such overseas experiences. The results revealed that over the observation period (a) both the English as a foreign language (EFL, remaining in Japan) and the ESL students improved their English proficiency, English composition quality/fluency, and confidence in English writing; (b) the ESL students’ overseas experiences were helpful for improving their writing strategy use and motivation to write better compositions; and (c) neither group's abilities or skills became like those of the EFL experts studied in Sasaki (2002).

[1]  Joy Reid,et al.  Second Language Writing: Responding to different topic types: a quantitative analysis from a contrastive rhetoric perspective , 1990 .

[2]  Ann Raimes,et al.  WHAT UNSKILLED ESL STUDENTS DO AS THEY WRITE: A CLASSROOM STUDY OF COMPOSING , 1985 .

[3]  Ling Shi,et al.  Effects of prewriting discussions on adult ESL students' compositions , 1998 .

[4]  Miyuki Sasaki,et al.  Building An Empirically-Based Model of Efl Learners’ Writing Processes , 2002 .

[5]  Heidi Riggenbach,et al.  Perspectives on Fluency , 2000 .

[6]  E. Berg,et al.  The effects of trained peer response on ESL students' revision types and writing quality , 1999 .

[7]  Miyuki Sasaki,et al.  Explanatory variables for Japanese students' expository writing in English: An exploratory study , 1994 .

[8]  Icy Lee,et al.  Teaching coherence to ESL students: a classroom inquiry , 2002 .

[9]  Alexandra Rowe Krapels.  Second Language Writing: An overview of second language writing process research , 1990 .

[10]  Richard D. Brecht,et al.  Predictors of Foreign Language Gain during Study Abroad. NFLC Occasional Papers. , 1995 .

[11]  In Search of Appropriateness in EF(S)L Teaching Materials , 1988 .

[12]  Miyuki Sasaki,et al.  Toward an Empirical Model of EFL Writing Processes: An Exploratory Study , 2000 .

[13]  Tony Silva,et al.  Second Language Writing: Second language composition instruction: developments, issues, and directions in ESL , 1990 .

[14]  First Language Composition Pedagogy in the Second Language Classroom: A Reassessment , 1988 .

[15]  Wenyu Wang,et al.  L1 Use in the L2 Composing Process: An Exploratory Study of 16 Chinese EFL Writers. , 2002 .

[16]  Martha C. Pennington,et al.  Comparing writing process and product across two languages: A study of 6 Singaporean university student writers , 1993 .

[17]  Vivian Zamel,et al.  Writing: The Process of Discovering Meaning , 1982 .

[18]  Miyuki Sasaki,et al.  Explanatory Variables for EFL Students' Expository Writing , 1996 .

[19]  Barbara F. Freed.  Language Learning and Study Abroad , 1995 .

[20]  Vivian Zamel.  The Composing Processes of Advanced ESL Students: Six Case Studies , 1983 .

[21]  Ann Raimes,et al.  Language Proficiency, Writing Ability, and Composing Strategies: A Study of ESL College Student Writers† , 1987 .

[22]  Alister Cumming,et al.  WRITING EXPERTISE AND SECOND LANGUAGE PROFICIENCY , 1989 .

[23]  Liz Murphy,et al.  The use of restructuring strategies in EFL writing: A study of Spanish learners of English as a foreign language , 1999 .

[24]  Liz Murphy,et al.  A Temporal Analysis of Formulation Processes in L1 and L2 Writing. , 2001 .

[25]  Yuichiro Anzai,et al.  HOW DO CHILDREN PRODUCE WRITINGS , 1981 .

[26]  Alister Cumming,et al.  Theoretical Perspectives on Writing , 1998, Annual Review of Applied Linguistics.