Many of the traditional air pollutants and greenhouse gases have common sources, offering a cost-effective potential for simultaneous improvements of traditional air pollution problems and climate change. A methodology has been developed to extend the RAINS integrated assessment model to explore synergies and trade-offs between the control of greenhouse gases and air pollution. With this extension, the GAINS (GHG-Air pollution INteraction and Synergies) model will allow the assessment of emission control costs for the six greenhouse gases covered under the Kyoto Protocol (CO2, CH4, N2O and the three F-gases) together with the emissions of air pollutants SO2, NOx, VOC, NH3 and PM. This report describes the first implementation (Version 1.0) of the model extension model to incorporate CO2 emissions.
GAINS Version 1.0 assesses 230 options for reducing CO2 emissions from the various source categories, both through structural changes in the energy system (fuel substitution, energy efficiency improvements) and through end-of-pipe measures (e.g., carbon capture). GAINS quantifies for 43 countries/regions in Europe country-specific application potentials of the various options in the different sectors of the economy, and estimates the societal resource costs of these measures. Mitigation potentials are estimated in relation to an exogenous baseline projection that is considered to reflect current planning, and are derived from a comparison of scenario results for a range of carbon prices obtained from energy models.
A critical element of the GAINS assessment refers to the assumptions on CO2 mitigation measures for which negative life cycle costs are calculated. There are a number of options for which the accumulated (and discounted over time) cost savings from reduced energy consumption outweigh their investments, even if private interest rates are used. If the construction of the baseline projection assumes a cost-effectiveness rationale, such measures would be autonomously adopted by the economic actors, even in the absence of any CO2 mitigation interest. In practice, however, it can be observed that various market imperfections impede the autonomous penetration. Due to the substantial CO2 mitigation potential that is associated with such negative cost options, projections of future CO2 emissions and even more of the available CO2 mitigation potentials are highly sensitive towards assumptions on their autonomous penetration rates occurring in the baseline projection.
Assuming that all negative cost measures would form an integral part of the Energy Outlook developed in 2003 by the Directorate General for Energy and Transport of the European Commission that has been developed with a cost-minimizing energy model, CO2 emissions in Europe would approach 1990 levels in 2020, even in absence of any specific climate policy. Beyond that, GAINS estimates for 2020 an additional reduction potential of 20 percent. With full application of all mitigation measures contained in the GAINS database, the power sector could reduce its CO2 emissions by 550 Mt, the transport sector by 400 Mt, industry by 190 Mt, and the residential and commercial sector by 50 Mt below the baseline projection. Total costs of all these measures would amount to approximately 90 billion Euro/year.
[1]
N. H. Ravindranath,et al.
2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories
,
2006
.
[2]
Ton Wildenborg,et al.
Cost curves for CO2 storage: European sector
,
2005
.
[3]
Edward S. Rubin,et al.
Towards fossil-based electricity systems with integrated CO2 capture: Implications of an illustrative long-term technology policy
,
2005
.
[4]
Keywan Riahi,et al.
Long-term Perspectives for Carbon Capture in Power Plants: Scenarios for the 21st Century
,
2004
.
[5]
Edward S. Rubin,et al.
Technological Learning for Carbon Capture and Sequestration Technologies
,
2004
.
[6]
Vincent Mahieu,et al.
Well-to-wheels analysis of future automotive fuels and powertrains in the european context
,
2004
.
[7]
Joan M. Ogden,et al.
Societal lifecycle costs of cars with alternative fuels/engines
,
2004
.
[8]
M. Cannell,et al.
Carbon sequestration and biomass energy offset: theoretical, potential and achievable capacities globally, in Europe and the UK
,
2003
.
[9]
C. Hendriks,et al.
Economic Evaluation of Sectoral Emission Reduction Objectives for Climate Change
,
2003
.
[10]
Ethniko Metsovio Polytechneio.
European energy and transport : trends to 2030
,
2003
.
[11]
L. Beurskens,et al.
An overview of biofuel technologies, markets and policies in Europe
,
2003
.
[12]
R. H. Williams,et al.
The contribution of biomass in the future global energy supply : a review of 17 studies
,
2003
.
[13]
Markus Amann,et al.
Modeling Particulate Emissions in Europe. A Framework to Estimate Reduction Potential and Control Costs
,
2002
.
[14]
Y. Kononov.
Price impact on Russian gas export to Asia and gas supply systems development
,
2002
.
[15]
Pantelis Capros,et al.
Low-CO2 energy pathways and regional air pollution in Europe
,
2001
.
[16]
Economic Evaluation of Carbon Dioxide Emission Reduction in the Household and Services Sectors in the EU EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
,
2001
.
[17]
Alexei G. Sankovski,et al.
Special report on emissions scenarios : a special report of Working group III of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
,
2000
.
[18]
K. Riahi,et al.
Greenhouse Gas Emissions in a Dynamics-as-Usual Scenario of Economic and Energy Development
,
2000
.
[19]
V. Putsche,et al.
Survey of the Economics of Hydrogen Technologies
,
1999
.
[20]
P. Jung.
Technical and Economic Assessment of Hydrogen and Methanol Powered Fuel Cell Electric Vehicles
,
1999
.
[21]
Markus Amann,et al.
Integrated assessment of European air pollution emission control strategies
,
1998,
Environ. Model. Softw..
[22]
C. Kroeze.
N2O from animal waste. Methodology according to IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories.
,
1997
.
[23]
T. Kram,et al.
Long-term energy and materials strategies for CO2 reduction
,
1995
.
[24]
William A. Beckman,et al.
Solar Engineering of Thermal Processes, 2nd ed.
,
1994
.