Segregation of ovarian cancer stage exploiting spectral biomarkers derived from blood plasma or serum analysis: ATR‐FTIR spectroscopy coupled with variable selection methods

Ovarian cancer is a solid tumor and a leading cause of mortality. Diagnostic tools for the detection of early stage (stage I) ovarian cancer are urgently needed. For this purpose, attenuated total reflection Fourier‐transform infrared spectroscopy (ATR‐FTIR) coupled with variable selection methods, successive projection algorithm or genetic algorithm (GA) combined with linear discriminant analysis (LDA), were employed to identify spectral biomarkers in blood plasma or serum samples for accurate diagnosis of different stages of ovarian cancer, histological type and segregation based on age. Three spectral datasets (stage I vs. stage II–IV; serous vs. non‐serous carcinoma; and, ≤60 years vs. >60 years) were processed: sensitivity and specificity required for real‐world diagnosis of ovarian cancer was achieved. Toward segregating stage I vs. stage II–IV, sensitivity and specificity (plasma blood) of 100% was achieved using a GA‐LDA model with 33 wavenumbers. For serous vs. non‐serous category (plasma blood), the sensitivity and specificity levels, using 29 wavenumbers by GA‐LDA, were remarkable (up to 94%). For ≤60 years and >60 years categories (plasma blood), the sensitivity and specificity, using 42 wavenumbers by GA‐LDA, gave complete accuracy (100%). For serum samples, sensitivity and specificity results gave relatively high accuracy (up to 91.6% stage I vs. stage II–IV; up to 93.0% serous vs. non‐serous; and, up to 96.0% ≤60 years vs. >60 years) using several wavenumbers. These findings justify a prospective population‐based assessment of biomarkers signatures using ATR‐FTIR spectroscopy as a screening tool for stage of ovarian cancer. © 2015 American Institute of Chemical Engineers Biotechnol. Prog., 31:832–839, 2015

[1]  D. Fishman,et al.  Three-dimensional power Doppler ultrasound improves the diagnostic accuracy for ovarian cancer prediction. , 2001, Gynecologic oncology.

[2]  R. Bast,et al.  Prospective Evaluation of Serum CA 125 Levels for Early Detection of Ovarian Cancer , 1992, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[3]  Y. T. van der Schouw,et al.  Guidelines for the Assessment of New Diagnostic Tests , 1995, Investigative radiology.

[4]  Francis L Martin,et al.  Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy coupled with a classification machine for the analysis of blood plasma or serum: a novel diagnostic approach for ovarian cancer. , 2013, The Analyst.

[5]  Francis L Martin,et al.  Tracking the cell hierarchy in the human intestine using biochemical signatures derived by mid-infrared microspectroscopy. , 2009, Stem cell research.

[6]  Daniel S. Miller,et al.  Cancer incidence and mortality, 1973‐1995 , 1998 .

[7]  Roberto Kawakami Harrop Galvão,et al.  The successive projections algorithm , 2013 .

[8]  T. Bourne,et al.  Transvaginal colour flow imaging: a possible new screening technique for ovarian cancer. , 1989, BMJ.

[9]  F. Martin,et al.  Exploiting biospectroscopy as a novel screening tool for cervical cancer: towards a framework to validate its accuracy in a routine clinical setting. , 2013, Bioanalysis.

[10]  [Ovarian neoplasms]. , 1981, Gynakologische Rundschau.

[11]  William J. Welch,et al.  Computer-aided design of experiments , 1981 .

[12]  Steven J Skates,et al.  Screening for ovarian cancer: a pilot randomised controlled trial , 1999, The Lancet.

[13]  R. Bast,et al.  Three Biomarkers Identified from Serum Proteomic Analysis for the Detection of Early Stage Ovarian Cancer , 2004, Cancer Research.

[14]  Aline S. Marques,et al.  Feature selection strategies for identification of Staphylococcus aureus recovered in blood cultures using FT-IR spectroscopy successive projections algorithm for variable selection: a case study. , 2014, Journal of microbiological methods.

[15]  Miguel de la Guardia,et al.  Feature selection strategies for quality screening of diesel samples by infrared spectrometry and linear discriminant analysis. , 2013, Talanta.

[16]  E. Petricoin,et al.  Use of proteomic patterns in serum to identify ovarian cancer , 2002, The Lancet.

[17]  E. Petricoin,et al.  Clinical potential of proteomics in the diagnosis of ovarian cancer , 2002, Expert review of molecular diagnostics.

[18]  Kym Faull,et al.  Characterization of serum biomarkers for detection of early stage ovarian cancer , 2005, Proteomics.

[19]  S. Arulkumaran,et al.  Infrared spectral features of exfoliated cervical cells, cervical adenocarcinoma tissue, and an adenocarcinoma cell line (SiSo). , 2002, Gynecologic oncology.

[20]  Francis L Martin,et al.  Derivation of a subtype-specific biochemical signature of endometrial carcinoma using synchrotron-based Fourier-transform infrared microspectroscopy. , 2009, Cancer letters.

[21]  J. Grudzinskas,et al.  Prevalence screening for ovarian cancer in postmenopausal women by CA 125 measurement and ultrasonography. , 1993, BMJ.

[22]  A R Feinstein,et al.  Use of methodological standards in diagnostic test research. Getting better but still not good. , 1995, JAMA.

[23]  Petros Karakitsos,et al.  Classification of cervical cytology for human papilloma virus (HPV) infection using biospectroscopy and variable selection techniques , 2014 .

[24]  Francis L Martin,et al.  Segregation of human prostate tissues classified high-risk (UK) versus low-risk (India) for adenocarcinoma using Fourier-transform infrared or Raman microspectroscopy coupled with discriminant analysis , 2011, Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry.

[25]  U Menon,et al.  Recent developments in ovarian cancer screening , 2000, Current opinion in obstetrics & gynecology.

[26]  D. Decker,et al.  Adjuvant therapy in stage I and stage II epithelial ovarian cancer. Results of two prospective randomized trials. , 1991, The New England journal of medicine.

[27]  D. Singer,et al.  Quantifying the potential benefit of CA 125 screening for ovarian cancer. , 1991, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[28]  S. Ellenberg,et al.  Adjuvant therapy in stage I and stage II epithelial ovarian cancer. Results of two prospective randomized trials , 1990, The New England journal of medicine.

[29]  E J Pavlik,et al.  The efficacy of transvaginal sonographic screening in asymptomatic women at risk for ovarian cancer. , 2000, Gynecologic oncology.

[30]  Celio Pasquini,et al.  Classification of Brazilian soils by using LIBS and variable selection in the wavelet domain. , 2009, Analytica chimica acta.

[31]  Kássio M. G. Lima,et al.  Infrared spectroscopy with multivariate analysis segregates low-grade cervical cytology based on likelihood to regress, remain static or progress , 2014 .

[32]  Francis L Martin,et al.  Biospectroscopy to metabolically profile biomolecular structure: a multistage approach linking computational analysis with biomarkers. , 2011, Journal of proteome research.

[33]  V. Raftopoulos,et al.  Serum CA 125 combined with transvaginal ultrasonography for ovarian cancer screening. , 2004, In vivo.

[34]  M Greiner,et al.  Epidemiologic issues in the validation of veterinary diagnostic tests. , 2000, Preventive veterinary medicine.