Image quality comparison of two adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASiR, ASiR-V) algorithms and filtered back projection in routine liver CT.

OBJECTIVE To compare image quality of two adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASiR and ASiR-V) algorithms using objective and subjective metrics for routine liver CT, with the conventional filtered back projection (FBP) reconstructions as reference standards. METHODS This institutional review board-approved study included 52 patients with clinically suspected hepatic metastases. Patients were divided equally into ASiR and ASiR-V groups with same scan parameters. Images were reconstructed with ASiR and ASiR-V from 0 (FBP) to 100% blending percentages at 10% interval in its respective group. Mean and standard deviation of CT numbers for liver parenchyma were recorded. Two experienced radiologists reviewed all images for image quality blindly and independently. Data were statistically analyzed. RESULTS There was no difference in CT dose index between ASiR and ASiR-V groups. As the percentage of ASiR and ASiR-V increased from 10 to 100% , image noise reduced by 8.6 -57.9% and 8.9-81.6%, respectively, compared with FBP. There was substantial interobserver agreement in image quality assessment for ASiR and ASiR-V images. Compared with FBP reconstruction, subjective image quality scores of ASiR and ASiR-V improved significantly as percentage increased from 10 to 80% for ASiR (peaked at 50% with 32.2% noise reduction) and from 10 to 90% (peaked at 60% with 51.5% noise reduction) for ASiR-V. CONCLUSION Both ASiR and ASiR-V improved the objective and subjective image quality for routine liver CT compared with FBP. ASiR-V provided further image quality improvement with higher acceptable percentage than ASiR, and ASiR-V60% had the highest image quality score. Advances in knowledge: (1) Both ASiR and ASiR-V significantly reduce image noise compared with conventional FBP reconstruction. (2) ASiR-V with 60 blending percentage provides the highest image quality score in routine liver CT.

[1]  Heejin Kwon,et al.  The adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-V technique for radiation dose reduction in abdominal CT: comparison with the adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique. , 2015, The British journal of radiology.

[2]  Katsuyuki Taguchi,et al.  Combination of a Low-Tube-Voltage Technique With Hybrid Iterative Reconstruction (iDose) Algorithm at Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography , 2011, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[3]  Anne Catrine Trægde Martinsen,et al.  Iterative reconstruction reduces abdominal CT dose. , 2012, European journal of radiology.

[4]  Zhou Yu,et al.  Fast Model-Based X-Ray CT Reconstruction Using Spatially Nonhomogeneous ICD Optimization , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[5]  Jacques Felblinger,et al.  CT image quality improvement using adaptive iterative dose reduction with wide-volume acquisition on 320-detector CT , 2012, European Radiology.

[6]  M. Körner,et al.  Filtered back projection, adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction, and a model-based iterative reconstruction in abdominal CT: an experimental clinical study. , 2013, Radiology.

[7]  Dominik Fleischmann,et al.  Computed tomography—old ideas and new technology , 2011, European Radiology.

[8]  H. Alkadhi,et al.  Raw data-based iterative reconstruction in body CTA: evaluation of radiation dose saving potential , 2011, European Radiology.

[9]  Alvin C. Silva,et al.  Innovations in CT dose reduction strategy: application of the adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction algorithm. , 2010, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[10]  D. Brenner,et al.  Computed tomography--an increasing source of radiation exposure. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[11]  K. P. Kim,et al.  Radiation exposure from CT scans in childhood and subsequent risk of leukaemia and brain tumours: a retrospective cohort study , 2012, The Lancet.

[12]  M. Gunn,et al.  State of the art: technologies for computed tomography dose reduction , 2010, Emergency Radiology.

[13]  David H. Kim,et al.  Abdominal CT with model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR): initial results of a prospective trial comparing ultralow-dose with standard-dose imaging. , 2012, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[14]  C Ghetti,et al.  CT iterative reconstruction in image space: a phantom study. , 2012, Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics.

[15]  Jiang Hsieh,et al.  Abdominal CT: comparison of adaptive statistical iterative and filtered back projection reconstruction techniques. , 2010, Radiology.