Arrhythmia Burden in Elderly Patients with Severe Aortic Stenosis as Determined by Continuous ECG Recording: Towards a Better Understanding of Arrhythmic Events Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

Background — This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence of previously undiagnosed arrhythmias in candidates for TAVR and to determine its impact on therapy changes and arrhythmic events following the procedure. Methods and Results — A total of 435 candidates for TAVR underwent 24-hour continuous electrocardiographic (ECG) monitoring the day before the procedure. Newly diagnosed arrhythmias were observed in 70 patients (16.1%) before TAVR: paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF)/atrial tachycardia (AT) in 28, advanced atrio-ventricular block (AVB) or severe bradycardia in 24, non-sustained ventricular tachycardia in 26, and intermittent left bundle branch block (LBBB) in 3 patients. All arrhythmic events but one were asymptomatic, and led to a therapy change in 43% of patients. In patients without known AF/AT, the occurrence of AF/AT during 24-hour ECG recording was associated with a higher rate of 30-day cerebrovascular events (7.1% vs 0.4%, P =0.030). Among the 53 patients with new-onset AF/AT after TAVR, 30.2% had newly diagnosed paroxysmal AF/AT before the procedure. In patients who needed permanent pacemaker implantation following the procedure (n=35), 31.4% had newly diagnosed advanced AVB or severe bradycardia before TAVR. New-onset persistent LBBB following TAVR occurred in 37 patients, 8.1% of whom had intermittent LBBB before the procedure. Conclusions — Newly diagnosed arrhythmias were observed in about a fifth of TAVR candidates, led to a higher rate of cerebrovascular events and accounted for a third of arrhythmic events following the procedure. This high arrhythmia burden highlights the importance of an early diagnosis of arrhythmic events in such patients in order to implement the appropriate therapeutic measures earlier on. surveillance by trained nurses or Holter monitors 14 in 407 (93.4%) and 28 (6.4%) patients, respectively. The occurrence of symptoms during arrhythmic events was assessed. All events were recorded and telemetry strips were further analyzed by a cardiologist at each center. All TAVR procedures were performed with ECG monitoring and arrhythmic events were prospectively collected. Patients were on continuous ECG monitoring at least 72 hours after TAVR 15 and an ECG was performed daily until hospital discharge. Physicians in charge of patients were aware of the ECG monitoring findings and were responsible for the changes in treatment if warranted. PPI was indicated if third-degree or advanced second-degree atrioventricular block (AVB) at any anatomical level occurred and was not expected to resolve, or in the presence of sinus node dysfunction and documented symptomatic bradycardia, according to current recommendations. 16 (cid:3) The indication and duration of anticoagulation therapy in newly detected AF was left at the discretion of the physician responsible for the patient. estimated glomerular filtration ratio; EuroSCORE: European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation; LBBB: left bundle branch block; LVEF: left ventricular ejection fraction; STS-PROM: Society of Thoracic Surgeons predicted risk of mortality

[1]  R. Lange,et al.  Treatment of aortic stenosis with a self-expanding transcatheter valve: the International Multi-centre ADVANCE Study. , 2014, European heart journal.

[2]  George C M Siontis,et al.  Prognostic significance of ambulatory ECG monitoring for ventricular arrhythmias. , 2013, Progress in cardiovascular diseases.

[3]  Wojciech Zareba,et al.  Ambulatory ECG monitoring in atrial fibrillation management. , 2013, Progress in cardiovascular diseases.

[4]  T. Uejima,et al.  Usefulness of frequent supraventricular extrasystoles and a high CHADS2 score to predict first-time appearance of atrial fibrillation. , 2013, The American journal of cardiology.

[5]  H. Kamel,et al.  Paroxysmal Supraventricular Tachycardia and the Risk of Ischemic Stroke , 2013, Stroke.

[6]  P. Wenaweser,et al.  Atrial Fibrillation and Aortic Stenosis: Impact on Clinical Outcomes Among Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation , 2013, Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions.

[7]  Mark A Hlatky,et al.  2012 ACCF/AHA/HRS focused update incorporated into the ACCF/AHA/HRS 2008 guidelines for device-based therapy of cardiac rhythm abnormalities: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. , 2013, Circulation.

[8]  F. Prinzen,et al.  Clinical Implications of Conduction Abnormalities and Arrhythmias After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation , 2013, Current Cardiology Reports.

[9]  J. Leipsic,et al.  Timing, Predictive Factors, and Prognostic Value of Cerebrovascular Events in a Large Cohort of Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve ImplantationClinical Perspective , 2012 .

[10]  N. Goldschlager,et al.  Bradyarrhythmias in the elderly. , 2012, Clinics in geriatric medicine.

[11]  P. Platonov,et al.  Aortic stenosis and mitral regurgitation as predictors of atrial fibrillation during 11 years of follow-up , 2012, BMC Cardiovascular Disorders.

[12]  Mario J. Garcia,et al.  2012 ACCF/AATS/SCAI/STS expert consensus document on transcatheter aortic valve replacement: developed in collabration with the American Heart Association, American Society of Echocardiography, European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, Heart Failure Society of America, Mended Hearts, Society , 2012, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[13]  P. Lambiase,et al.  The prognostic significance of premature ventricular complexes in adults without clinically apparent heart disease: a meta-analysis and systematic review , 2012, Heart.

[14]  P. Leprince,et al.  Registry of transcatheter aortic-valve implantation in high-risk patients. , 2012, The New England journal of medicine.

[15]  A. Colombo,et al.  Transcatheter aortic valve implantation: 3-year outcomes of self-expanding CoreValve prosthesis. , 2012, European heart journal.

[16]  A. Capucci,et al.  Subclinical atrial fibrillation and the risk of stroke. , 2012, The New England journal of medicine.

[17]  G. Breithardt,et al.  Comprehensive risk reduction in patients with atrial fibrillation: emerging diagnostic and therapeutic options--a report from the 3rd Atrial Fibrillation Competence NETwork/European Heart Rhythm Association consensus conference. , 2012, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[18]  Josep Rodés-Cabau,et al.  Transcatheter aortic valve implantation: current and future approaches , 2012, Nature Reviews Cardiology.

[19]  Pascal Vranckx,et al.  Updated standardized endpoint definitions for transcatheter aortic valve implantation: the Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 consensus document. , 2012, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[20]  D. Salem,et al.  Are you too young? , 2011, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[21]  Fabian Nietlispach,et al.  Transcatheter aortic valve implantation for the treatment of severe symptomatic aortic stenosis in patients at very high or prohibitive surgical risk: acute and late outcomes of the multicenter Canadian experience. , 2010, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[22]  M. Josephson,et al.  Paroxysmal atrioventricular block. , 2009, Heart rhythm.

[23]  J. Cleland,et al.  The prevalence and incidence of left bundle branch block in ambulant patients with chronic heart failure , 2007, European journal of heart failure.

[24]  M. Movahed,et al.  Increased prevalence of third-degree atrioventricular block in patients with type II diabetes mellitus. , 2005, Chest.

[25]  F. Lombardi,et al.  Utility of implantable loop recorder (Reveal Plus) in the diagnosis of unexplained syncope. , 2005, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[26]  R. Califf,et al.  Practice Standards for Electrocardiographic Monitoring in Hospital Settings: An American Heart Association Scientific Statement From the Councils on Cardiovascular Nursing, Clinical Cardiology, and Cardiovascular Disease in the Young , 2004, Circulation.

[27]  M. Nieminen,et al.  Association of left bundle branch block with left ventricular structure and function in hypertensive patients with left ventricular hypertrophy: the LIFE study , 2004, Journal of Human Hypertension.

[28]  Richard Sutton,et al.  International consensus on nomenclature and classification of atrial fibrillation: A collaborative project of the Working Group on Arrhythmias and the Working Group of Cardiac Pacing of the European Society of Cardiology and the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology. , 2003, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[29]  G. Aurigemma,et al.  Ventricular arrhythmias in adult aortic stenosis: prevalence, mechanisms, and clinical relevance. , 1998, Chest.

[30]  D. Levy,et al.  Independent risk factors for atrial fibrillation in a population-based cohort. The Framingham Heart Study. , 1994, JAMA.

[31]  J. F. Keane,et al.  Arrhythmias in patients with valvar aortic stenosis, valvar pulmonary stenosis, and ventricular septal defect. Results of 24-hour ECG monitoring. , 1993, Circulation.

[32]  V. Maranhao,et al.  Correlates of prolonged HV conduction in aortic stenosis. , 1985, American heart journal.

[33]  W. Yater,et al.  HEART BLOCK DUE TO CALCAREOUS LESIONS OF THE BUNDLE OF HIS: REVIEW AND REPORT OF A CASE WITH DETAILED HISTOPATHOLOGIC STUDY , 2020 .