Performance analysis of energy harvesting sensors with time-correlated energy supply

Sensors powered by energy harvesting devices (EHD) are increasingly being deployed in practice, due to the demonstrated advantage of long-term, autonomous operation, without the need for battery replacement. This paper is concerned with the following fundamental problem: how should the harvested energy be managed to ensure optimal performance, if the statistical properties of the ambient energy supply are known? To formulate the problem mathematically, we consider an EHD-powered sensor which senses data of varying importance and model the availability of ambient energy by a two-state Markov chain (“GOOD” and “BAD”). Assuming that data transmission incurs an energy cost, our objective is to identify low-complexity transmission policies, which achieve good performance in terms of average long-term importance of the transmitted data. We derive the performance of a Balanced Policy (BP), which adapts the transmission probability to the ambient energy supply, so as to balance energy harvesting and consumption, and demonstrate that it performs within 5% of the globally optimal policy. Moreover, a BP which avoids energy overflow by always transmitting when the sensor battery is fully charged is shown to perform within 4% of the optimum. Finally, we identify a key performance parameter of the system, the relative battery capacity, defined as the ratio of the battery capacity to the expected duration of the BAD harvesting period.

[1]  R. Bellman,et al.  Dynamic Programming and Markov Processes , 1960 .

[2]  Matthew B. Dwyer,et al.  Sensing through the continent: Towards monitoring migratory birds using cellular sensor networks , 2012, 2012 ACM/IEEE 11th International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks (IPSN).

[3]  Leonardo Badia,et al.  Correlated energy generation and imperfect State-of-Charge knowledge in energy harvesting devices , 2012, 2012 8th International Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing Conference (IWCMC).

[4]  Roy D. Yates,et al.  A generic model for optimizing single-hop transmission policy of replenishable sensors , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[5]  Joseph A. Paradiso,et al.  Energy scavenging for mobile and wireless electronics , 2005, IEEE Pervasive Computing.

[6]  Keith W. Ross,et al.  Randomized and Past-Dependent Policies for Markov Decision Processes with Multiple Constraints , 1989, Oper. Res..

[7]  S. Kannan,et al.  Optimal Selective Forwarding for Energy Saving in Wireless Sensor Networks , 2012 .

[8]  Michele Zorzi,et al.  On optimal transmission policies for energy harvesting devices , 2012, 2012 Information Theory and Applications Workshop.

[9]  Vijay K. Bhargava,et al.  Wireless sensor networks with energy harvesting technologies: a game-theoretic approach to optimal energy management , 2007, IEEE Wireless Communications.

[10]  Elizabeth L. Wilmer,et al.  Markov Chains and Mixing Times , 2008 .

[11]  J. Miller Numerical Analysis , 1966, Nature.

[12]  Dimitri P. Bertsekas,et al.  Dynamic Programming and Optimal Control, Two Volume Set , 1995 .

[13]  Leandros Tassiulas,et al.  Control of wireless networks with rechargeable batteries [transactions papers] , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[14]  Vinod Sharma,et al.  Optimal energy management policies for energy harvesting sensor nodes , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[15]  Biplab Sikdar,et al.  Energy efficient transmission strategies for Body Sensor Networks with energy harvesting , 2008, 2008 42nd Annual Conference on Information Sciences and Systems.

[16]  Leonardo Badia,et al.  Operation policies for Energy Harvesting Devices with imperfect State-of-Charge knowledge , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC).

[17]  Koushik Kar,et al.  Rechargeable sensor activation under temporally correlated events , 2009, Wirel. Networks.