Influence of Algebraic T-norm on Different Indiscernibility Relationships in Fuzzy-Rough Rule Induction Algorithms

The rule induction algorithms generate rules directly in human-understandable if-then form, and this property is essential of successful intelligent classifier. Similar as crisp algorithms, the fuzzy and rough set methods are used to generate rule based induction algorithms. Recently, a rule induction algorithms based on fuzzy-rough theory were proposed. These algorithms operate on the well-known upper and lower approximation concepts, and they are sensitive to different T-norms, implicators and more over; to different similarity metrics. In this paper, we experimentally evaluate the influence of the T-norm Algebraic norm on the classification and regression tasks performance on three fuzzy-rough rule induction algorithms. The experimental results revealed some interesting results, moreover, the choice of similarity metric in combination with the T-norm on some datasets has no influence at all. Based on the experimental results, further investigation is required to investigate the influence of other T-norms on the algorithm’s performance.

[1]  Xizhao Wang,et al.  Learning fuzzy rules from fuzzy samples based on rough set technique , 2007, Inf. Sci..

[2]  Jonathan Lawry,et al.  LFOIL: Linguistic rule induction in the label semantics framework , 2008, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[3]  Georgina Mirceva,et al.  A novel fuzzy based approach simple sequentially rejective multiple for inducing diatom habitat models and discovering diatom indicating properties , 2012, Ecol. Informatics.

[4]  Catherine Blake,et al.  UCI Repository of machine learning databases , 1998 .

[5]  Qiang Shen,et al.  A rough-fuzzy approach for generating classification rules , 2002, Pattern Recognit..

[6]  Nan-Chen Hsieh Rule Extraction with Rough-Fuzzy Hybridization Method , 2008, PAKDD.

[7]  C. Cornelis,et al.  Vaguely Quantified Rough Sets , 2009, RSFDGrC.

[8]  Qiang Shen,et al.  Computational Intelligence and Feature Selection - Rough and Fuzzy Approaches , 2008, IEEE Press series on computational intelligence.

[9]  Qiang Shen,et al.  From approximative to descriptive fuzzy classifiers , 2002, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst..

[10]  Masahiro Inuiguchi,et al.  Fuzzy rough sets and multiple-premise gradual decision rules , 2006, Int. J. Approx. Reason..

[11]  Ulrich Bodenhofer,et al.  FS-FOIL: an inductive learning method for extracting interpretable fuzzy descriptions , 2003, Int. J. Approx. Reason..

[12]  Tzung-Pei Hong,et al.  Learning with Hierarchical Quantitative Attributes by Fuzzy Rough Sets , 2006, JCIS.

[13]  Jacobus van Zyl,et al.  Fuzzy rule induction in a set covering framework , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems.

[14]  Z. Pawlak Rough Sets: Theoretical Aspects of Reasoning about Data , 1991 .

[15]  Chris Cornelis,et al.  Hybrid fuzzy-rough rule induction and feature selection , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems.

[16]  Gilles Richard,et al.  Enriching Relational Learning with Fuzzy Predicates , 2003, PKDD.