FMRI analysis of contrast polarity in face-selective cortex in humans and monkeys

Recognition is strongly impaired when the normal contrast polarity of faces is reversed. For instance, otherwise-familiar faces become very difficult to recognize when viewed as photographic negatives. Here, we used fMRI to demonstrate related properties in visual cortex: 1) fMRI responses in the human Fusiform Face Area (FFA) decreased strongly (26%) to contrast-reversed faces across a wide range of contrast levels (5.3-100% RMS contrast), in all subjects tested. In a whole brain analysis, this contrast polarity bias was largely confined to the Fusiform Face Area (FFA; p<0.0001), with possible involvement of a left occipital face-selective region. 2) It is known that reversing facial contrast affects three image properties in parallel (absorbance, shading, and specular reflection). Here, comparison of FFA responses to those in V1 suggests that the contrast polarity bias is produced in FFA only when all three component properties were reversed simultaneously, which suggests a prominent non-linearity in FFA processing. 3) Across a wide range (180°) of illumination source angles, 3D face shapes without texture produced response constancy in FFA, without a contrast polarity bias. 4) Consistent with psychophysics, analogous fMRI biases for normal contrast polarity were not produced by non-face objects, with image statistics similar to the face stimuli. 5) Using fMRI, we also demonstrated a contrast polarity bias in awake behaving macaque monkeys, in the cortical region considered homologous to human FFA. Thus common cortical mechanisms may underlie facial contrast processing across ~25 million years of primate evolution.

[1]  Doris Y. Tsao,et al.  What Makes a Cell Face Selective? The Importance of Contrast , 2012, Neuron.

[2]  M. Seghier,et al.  A network of occipito-temporal face-sensitive areas besides the right middle fusiform gyrus is necessary for normal face processing. , 2003, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[3]  R. Andersen,et al.  Functional analysis of human MT and related visual cortical areas using magnetic resonance imaging , 1995, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[4]  Natalia Y. Bilenko,et al.  The “Parahippocampal Place Area” Responds Preferentially to High Spatial Frequencies in Humans and Monkeys , 2011, PLoS biology.

[5]  Azriel Rosenfeld,et al.  Face recognition: A literature survey , 2003, CSUR.

[6]  E. Rolls,et al.  Size and contrast have only small effects on the responses to faces of neurons in the cortex of the superior temporal sulcus of the monkey , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[7]  M. Farah,et al.  What is "special" about face perception? , 1998, Psychological review.

[8]  T. Allison,et al.  Face-sensitive regions in human extrastriate cortex studied by functional MRI. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[9]  Brittany S. Cassidy,et al.  Lower-Level Stimulus Features Strongly Influence Responses in the Fusiform Face Area , 2010, Cerebral cortex.

[10]  F. Chavane,et al.  Imaging cortical correlates of illusion in early visual cortex , 2004, Nature.

[11]  G. Orban,et al.  Visual Motion Processing Investigated Using Contrast Agent-Enhanced fMRI in Awake Behaving Monkeys , 2001, Neuron.

[12]  Michael C. Mangini,et al.  The deleterious effect of contrast reversal on recognition is unique to faces, not objects , 2007, Vision Research.

[13]  Anders M. Dale,et al.  Cortical Surface-Based Analysis I. Segmentation and Surface Reconstruction , 1999, NeuroImage.

[14]  Elinor McKone,et al.  Are Faces Special , 2011 .

[15]  D G Pelli,et al.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[16]  I. Biederman,et al.  Is Pigmentation Important for Face Recognition? Evidence from Contrast Negation , 2006, Perception.

[17]  Roger B. H. Tootell,et al.  Role of fusiform and anterior temporal cortical areas in facial recognition , 2012, NeuroImage.

[18]  A. Dale,et al.  Functional analysis of primary visual cortex (V1) in humans. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  A. M. Dale,et al.  BORDERS OF MULTIPLE VISUAL AREAS IN HUMANS REVEALED BY FUNCTIONAL MRI , 1995 .

[20]  J. Hochberg,et al.  Recognition memory for photographs of faces. , 1971, The American journal of psychology.

[21]  Doris Y. Tsao,et al.  Stereopsis Activates V3A and Caudal Intraparietal Areas in Macaques and Humans , 2003, Neuron.

[22]  P. Bex,et al.  Spatial frequency, phase, and the contrast of natural images. , 2002, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[23]  Lawrence L. Wald,et al.  Accurate prediction of V1 location from cortical folds in a surface coordinate system , 2008, NeuroImage.

[24]  T. Hendler,et al.  Contrast sensitivity in human visual areas and its relationship to object recognition. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[25]  A. Young,et al.  In the Eye of the Beholder: The Science of Face Perception , 1998 .

[26]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  The Effect of Face Inversion on Activity in Human Neural Systems for Face and Object Perception , 1999, Neuron.

[27]  A. Dale,et al.  Cortical Surface-Based Analysis II: Inflation, Flattening, and a Surface-Based Coordinate System , 1999, NeuroImage.

[28]  I. Gauthier,et al.  Expertise for cars and birds recruits brain areas involved in face recognition , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[29]  E. Halgren,et al.  Location of human face‐selective cortex with respect to retinotopic areas , 1999, Human brain mapping.

[30]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  fMRI mapping of a morphed continuum of 3D shapes within inferior temporal cortex , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[31]  Doris Y. Tsao,et al.  Faces and objects in macaque cerebral cortex , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[32]  I. Biederman,et al.  What makes faces special? , 2006, Vision Research.

[33]  V. Bruce,et al.  Effects of lighting on the perception of facial surfaces. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[34]  Marlene Behrmann,et al.  Unraveling the distributed neural code of facial identity through spatiotemporal pattern analysis , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[35]  K. Grill-Spector,et al.  Differential development of high-level visual cortex correlates with category-specific recognition memory , 2007, Nature Neuroscience.

[36]  M. Tarr,et al.  The Fusiform Face Area is Part of a Network that Processes Faces at the Individual Level , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[37]  Katrin Amunts,et al.  Locating the functional and anatomical boundaries of human primary visual cortex , 2009, NeuroImage.

[38]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Object representations in the temporal cortex of monkeys and humans as revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging. , 2009, Journal of neurophysiology.

[39]  P. Sinha,et al.  The Role of Eyebrows in Face Recognition , 2003, Perception.

[40]  R. Dolan,et al.  Contrast polarity and face recognition in the human fusiform gyrus , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[41]  Kenneth F. Valyear,et al.  The fusiform face area is not sufficient for face recognition: Evidence from a patient with dense prosopagnosia and no occipital face area , 2006, Neuropsychologia.

[42]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[43]  E. Switkes,et al.  Functional anatomy of macaque striate cortex. III. Color , 1988, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[44]  S. Edelman,et al.  Differential Processing of Objects under Various Viewing Conditions in the Human Lateral Occipital Complex , 1999, Neuron.

[45]  Scott O. Murray,et al.  Contrast Invariance in the Human Lateral Occipital Complex Depends on Attention , 2006, Current Biology.

[46]  Joonyeol Lee,et al.  Spatial Attention and the Latency of Neuronal Responses in Macaque Area V4 , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[47]  P. Sinha,et al.  Role of ordinal contrast relationships in face encoding , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[48]  V. Bruce,et al.  Effects of lighting on the perception of facial surfaces. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[49]  P. Lennie,et al.  Coding of image contrast in central visual pathways of the macaque monkey , 1990, Vision Research.

[50]  C. Liu,et al.  Lighting direction affects recognition of untextured faces in photographic positive and negative , 1999, Vision Research.

[51]  D. Heeger,et al.  Linear Systems Analysis of Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Human V1 , 1996, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[52]  Talma Hendler,et al.  Vase or face? A neural correlate of shape-selective grouping processes in the human brain , 2001, NeuroImage.

[53]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Statistical parametric maps in functional imaging: A general linear approach , 1994 .

[54]  E Kaplan,et al.  Contrast affects the transmission of visual information through the mammalian lateral geniculate nucleus. , 1987, The Journal of physiology.

[55]  D. Pitcher,et al.  The role of the occipital face area in the cortical face perception network , 2011, Experimental Brain Research.

[56]  G. Yovel,et al.  TMS Evidence for the Involvement of the Right Occipital Face Area in Early Face Processing , 2007, Current Biology.

[57]  M. Farah,et al.  Parts and Wholes in Face Recognition , 1993, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[58]  Mark H Johnson,et al.  Rapid Orienting toward Face-like Stimuli with Gaze-Relevant Contrast Information , 2009, Perception.

[59]  Jiye G. Kim,et al.  Adaptation in the fusiform face area (FFA): Image or person? , 2009, Vision Research.

[60]  R. Galper,et al.  Recognition of faces in photographic negative , 1970 .

[61]  R. Tootell,et al.  An anterior temporal face patch in human cortex, predicted by macaque maps , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[62]  D. V. van Essen,et al.  The Processing of Visual Shape in the Cerebral Cortex of Human and Nonhuman Primates: A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[63]  Paul Schrater,et al.  Shape perception reduces activity in human primary visual cortex , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[64]  J W Belliveau,et al.  Borders of multiple visual areas in humans revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging. , 1995, Science.

[65]  Rainer Goebel,et al.  From Coarse to Fine? Spatial and Temporal Dynamics of Cortical Face Processing , 2010, Cerebral cortex.

[66]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The Fusiform Face Area: A Module in Human Extrastriate Cortex Specialized for Face Perception , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[67]  Doris Y. Tsao,et al.  Functional Compartmentalization and Viewpoint Generalization Within the Macaque Face-Processing System , 2010, Science.

[68]  V Bruce,et al.  The Use of Pigmentation and Shading Information in Recognising the Sex and Identities of Faces , 1994, Perception.

[69]  R Kemp,et al.  Perception and Recognition of Normal and Negative Faces: The Role of Shape from Shading and Pigmentation Cues , 1996, Perception.

[70]  Anders M. Dale,et al.  Repeated fMRI Using Iron Oxide Contrast Agent in Awake, Behaving Macaques at 3 Tesla , 2002, NeuroImage.

[71]  R. Malach,et al.  Object-related activity revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging in human occipital cortex. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[72]  R. Goebel,et al.  Individual faces elicit distinct response patterns in human anterior temporal cortex , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[73]  Doris Y. Tsao,et al.  A Cortical Region Consisting Entirely of Face-Selective Cells , 2006, Science.

[74]  C. Gross,et al.  Neural representations of faces and body parts in macaque and human cortex: a comparative FMRI study. , 2009, Journal of neurophysiology.