Social Influence as a Driver of Engagement in a Web-Based Health Intervention

Background Web-based health interventions can drive behavior change, but their effectiveness depends on participants’ usage. A well-recognized challenge with these interventions is nonusage attrition or weak engagement that results in participants receiving low doses of the intervention, negatively affecting outcomes. We present an approach based on the theoretical concepts of social influence and complex contagion in an effort to address the engagement problem in a specific, commercial, online behavior change intervention. Objective To examine the relation between social ties and engagement within a specific online intervention. The aims were (1) to determine whether experiencing the intervention socially influences engagement, such that individuals with social ties show higher engagement than those without ties, and (2) to evaluate whether complex contagion increases engagement—that is, whether engagement increases as the number of ties an individual has in the intervention increases. Methods We analyzed observational data from 84,828 subscribed members of a specific Web-based intervention, Daily Challenge. We compiled three measures of engagement for every member: email opens, site visits, and challenge completions (response to action prompts). We compared members with and without social ties within the intervention on each measure separately using 2-tailed independent-sample t tests. Finally, we performed linear regressions with each simple engagement measure as the dependent variable and number of social ties as the independent variable. Results Compared with those without social ties, participants with social ties opened more emails (33.0% vs 27.2%, P < .001), visited the website more often (12.6 vs 6.7 visits, P < .001), and reported completing more of the actions they were prompted to perform (11.0 vs 6.1 actions, P < .001). Social ties were significant predictors of email opens (beta = 0.68, P < .001), site visits (beta = 1.52, P < .001), and reported action completions (beta = 1.32, P < .001). Conclusions Our initial findings are higher engagement in participants with social ties in the program and are consistent with the view that social influence can drive engagement in a Web-based health intervention.

[1]  H. Kelman.  Compliance, identification, and internalization three processes of attitude change , 1958 .

[2]  H. Christensen,et al.  Adherence in Internet Interventions for Anxiety and Depression: Systematic Review , 2009, Journal of medical Internet research.

[3]  N. Christakis.  Health care in a web , 2008, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[4]  James O. Hill,et al.  Can a small-changes approach help address the obesity epidemic? A report of the Joint Task Force of the American Society for Nutrition, Institute of Food Technologists, and International Food Information Council. , 2009, The American journal of clinical nutrition.

[5]  D. Wantland,et al.  The Effectiveness of Web-Based vs. Non-Web-Based Interventions: A Meta-Analysis of Behavioral Change Outcomes , 2004, Journal of medical Internet research.

[6]  Nathan K. Cobb,et al.  Initial evaluation of a real-world Internet smoking cessation system. , 2005, Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco.

[7]  Mick P Couper,et al.  Engagement and Retention: Measuring Breadth and Depth of Participant Use of an Online Intervention , 2010, Journal of medical Internet research.

[8]  Damon Centola,et al.  The Spread of Behavior in an Online Social Network Experiment , 2010, Science.

[9]  B. Latané.  The psychology of social impact. , 1981 .

[10]  G. Eysenbach.  The Law of Attrition , 2005, Journal of medical Internet research.

[11]  T. Valente.  Social network thresholds in the diffusion of innovations , 1996 .

[12]  Ilse de Bourdeaudhuij,et al.  Effect of a tailored behavior change program on a composite lifestyle change score: a randomized controlled trial. , 2011, Health education research.

[13]  Miriam Wanner,et al.  Comparison of Trial Participants and Open Access Users of a Web-Based Physical Activity Intervention Regarding Adherence, Attrition, and Repeated Participation , 2010, Journal of medical Internet research.

[14]  James O. Hill,et al.  Obesity and the Environment: Where Do We Go from Here? , 2003, Science.

[15]  L. Mâsse,et al.  Does Adherence to a Lifestyle Physical Activity Intervention Predict Changes in Physical Activity? , 2003, Journal of Behavioral Medicine.

[16]  Mick P Couper,et al.  Reach, Engagement, and Retention in an Internet-Based Weight Loss Program in a Multi-Site Randomized Controlled Trial , 2007, Journal of medical Internet research.

[17]  N. Christakis,et al.  The Spread of Obesity in a Large Social Network Over 32 Years , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[18]  M. Macy,et al.  Complex Contagions and the Weakness of Long Ties1 , 2007, American Journal of Sociology.

[19]  Nathan K. Cobb,et al.  Social network structure of a large online community for smoking cessation. , 2010, American journal of public health.

[20]  A. Bauman,et al.  Engagement and retention of participants in a physical activity website. , 2005, Preventive medicine.

[21]  Sarah M. Greene,et al.  The Role of Engagement in a Tailored Web-Based Smoking Cessation Program: Randomized Controlled Trial , 2008, Journal of medical Internet research.