WHY IS INVOLVEMENT IN UNSTRUCTURED SOCIALIZING RELATED TO ADOLESCENT DELINQUENCY

The relationship between unstructured socializing (peer-oriented activity without supervision) and adolescent delinquency is widely established and recognized, but less is known about why this relationship exists. The present study integrates the unstructured socializing perspective with insights from social learning theory and other theoretical perspectives on peer influence and empirically investigates four possible explanatory processes. The study applies time diary data to operationalize accurately the concept of unstructured socializing and survey data to capture mediating variables and self-reported delinquency (a general frequency measure of various offenses, as well as specified measures for violence, theft, and vandalism). Data were collected longitudinally with two waves of surveys and space–time budget interviews among 610 adolescents (11 to 20 years of age). A multilevel-path model was estimated to analyze within-individual changes over time. The findings indicate that three of the four proposed explanatory processes contribute to the explanation of the relationship between unstructured socializing and delinquency.

[1]  E. Hoeben,et al.  Situational conditions and adolescent offending: Does the impact of unstructured socializing depend on its location? , 2014 .

[2]  Charles B. Fleming,et al.  After-School Activities, Misbehavior in School, and Delinquency From the End of Elementary School Through the Beginning of High School , 2008 .

[3]  M. Junger,et al.  Routine Activities and Deviant Behaviors: American, Dutch, Hungarian, and Swiss Youth , 2002 .

[4]  I. Piliavin,et al.  Delinquency, Situational Inducements, and Commitment to Conformity , 1965 .

[5]  B. B. Brown,et al.  Perceptions of peer pressure, peer conformity dispositions, and self-reported behavior among adolescents. , 1986 .

[6]  Kristopher J Preacher,et al.  A general multilevel SEM framework for assessing multilevel mediation. , 2010, Psychological methods.

[7]  Thomas J. Dishion,et al.  Deviancy training in male adolescent friendships , 1996 .

[8]  Deborah J. Smith,et al.  The moral reasoning of juvenile delinquents: A meta-analysis , 1990, Journal of abnormal child psychology.

[9]  D. Haynie.  Delinquent Peers Revisited: Does Network Structure Matter?1 , 2001, American Journal of Sociology.

[10]  Joshua D. Freilich,et al.  An assessment of the empirical validity and conceptualization of individual level multivariate studies of lifestyle/routine activities theory published from 1995 to 2005 , 2009 .

[11]  L. Steinberg.  Latchkey children and susceptibility to peer pressure: An ecological analysis. , 1986 .

[12]  Patrick M. O'Malley,et al.  Routine activities and individual deviant behavior , 1996 .

[13]  Travis C. Pratt,et al.  Assessing Macro-Level Predictors and Theories of Crime: A Meta-Analysis , 2005, Crime and Justice.

[14]  L. Lanza-Kaduce,et al.  Social learning and deviant behavior: a specific test of a general theory. , 1979, American sociological review.

[15]  Dina R. Rose,et al.  Doing What Simple Simon Says? , 1998 .

[16]  W. Bernasco,et al.  Situational Causes of Offending: A Fixed-Effects Analysis of Space-Time Budget Data , 2013 .

[17]  Kenneth A. Bollen,et al.  Total, Direct, and Indirect Effects in Structural Equation Models , 1987 .

[18]  A. Crouter,et al.  Time with peers from middle childhood to late adolescence: developmental course and adjustment correlates. , 2014, Child development.

[19]  J. McGloin,et al.  The Risk of Informal Socializing with Peers: Considering Gender Differences Across Predatory Delinquency and Substance Use , 2013 .

[20]  Gregory M. Zimmerman,et al.  An investigation into the empirical relationship between time with peers, friendship, and delinquency , 2014 .

[21]  Lorena Montoya,et al.  Online social sports networks as crime facilitators , 2014 .

[22]  W. Bernasco,et al.  Gender Differences in Delinquency and Situational Action Theory: A Partial Test , 2016 .

[23]  Cesar J. Rebellon.  Do Adolescents Engage in Delinquency to Attract the Social Attention of Peers? An Extension and Longitudinal Test of the Social Reinforcement Hypothesis , 2006 .

[24]  Bengt Muthén,et al.  Causal Effects in Mediation Modeling: An Introduction With Applications to Latent Variables , 2015 .

[25]  David Maimon,et al.  UNSTRUCTURED SOCIALIZING, COLLECTIVE EFFICACY, AND VIOLENT BEHAVIOR AMONG URBAN YOUTH* , 2010 .

[26]  L. Hughes,et al.  Partying, Cruising, and Hanging in the Streets: Gangs, Routine Activities, and Delinquency and Violence in Chicago, 1959–1962 , 2014 .

[27]  Tamara D. Madensen,et al.  The Empirical Status of Social Learning Theory: A Meta‐Analysis , 2010 .

[28]  R. Agnew,et al.  Leisure and Delinquency , 1989 .

[29]  M. Prinstein,et al.  Beyond Homophily: A Decade of Advances in Understanding Peer Influence Processes. , 2011, Journal of research on adolescence : the official journal of the Society for Research on Adolescence.

[30]  Gresham M. Sykes,et al.  Juvenile Delinquency and Subterranean Values , 1961 .

[31]  A. Bandura,et al.  Mechanisms of Moral Disengagement in the Exercise of Moral Agency , 1996 .

[32]  Hiromi Ono,et al.  2. An Assessment of Alternative Measures of Time Use , 2003 .

[33]  F. Weerman,et al.  The Social Transmission of Delinquency , 2012 .

[34]  V. Ceccato,et al.  Activity Fields and the Dynamics of Crime , 2010 .

[35]  Iiris Niemi.  Systematic error in behavioural measurement: Comparing results from interview and time budget studies , 1993 .

[36]  M. Stoolmiller,et al.  Antisocial Behavior, Delinquent Peer Association, and Unsupervised Wandering for Boys: Growth and Change from Childhood to Early Adolescence. , 1994, Multivariate behavioral research.

[37]  J. Gibbs,et al.  The Moral Judgment of Juvenile Delinquents: A Meta-Analysis , 2006, Journal of abnormal child psychology.

[38]  Kyle J. Thomas,et al.  A DUAL-SYSTEMS APPROACH FOR UNDERSTANDING DIFFERENTIAL SUSCEPTIBILITY TO PROCESSES OF PEER INFLUENCE† , 2013 .

[39]  L. Pauwels,et al.  Adolescent Lifestyle Risk by Gender and Ethnic Background , 2009 .

[40]  Amy L. Anderson,et al.  UNSTRUCTURED SOCIALIZING AND RATES OF DELINQUENCY , 2004 .

[41]  Lawrence E. Cohen,et al.  Social Change and Crime Rate Trends: A Routine Activity Approach , 1979 .

[42]  Robert Svensson,et al.  It's not the time they spend, it's what they do: The interaction between delinquent friends and unstructured routine activity on delinquency: Findings from two countries , 2010 .

[43]  F. Weerman,et al.  Peers and delinquency among girls and boys: Are sex differences in delinquency explained by peer factors? , 2012 .

[44]  A. Crouter,et al.  Free- time activities in middle childhood: links with adjustment in early adolescence. , 2001, Child development.

[45]  T. Dishion,et al.  Adolescent Growth in New Forms of Problem Behavior: Macro- and Micro-Peer Dynamics , 2004, Prevention Science.

[46]  Robert L. Akers,et al.  A Differential Association-Reinforcement Theory of Criminal Behavior , 1966 .

[47]  J. Hawdon.  Deviant Lifestyles , 1996 .

[48]  R. Agnew.  Testing the Leading Crime Theories: An Alternative Strategy Focusing on Motivational Processes , 1995 .

[49]  Lorine A. Hughes,et al.  Exposure to Situations Conducive to Delinquent Behavior , 2009 .

[50]  W. Hartup.  Peer Interaction: What Causes What? , 2005, Journal of abnormal child psychology.

[51]  L. L. Williams,et al.  Who are they with and what are they doing? Delinquent behavior, substance use, and early adolescents' after-school time. , 1999, The American journal of orthopsychiatry.

[52]  Joel Miller,et al.  Individual Offending, Routine Activities, and Activity Settings: Revisiting the Routine Activity Theory of General Deviance , 2013 .

[53]  P. W. Rountree,et al.  Peer pressure and adolescent substance use , 1997 .

[54]  Mark Warr.  ORGANIZATION AND INSTIGATION IN DELINQUENT GROUPS , 1996 .

[55]  S. Wong.  The Effects of Adolescent Activities on Delinquency: A Differential Involvement Approach , 2005 .

[56]  Ryan C. Meldrum,et al.  Susceptibility to Peer Influence, Self-Control, and Delinquency* , 2013 .

[57]  L. Pauwels,et al.  Is a Risky Lifestyle Always “Risky”? The Interaction Between Individual Propensity and Lifestyle Risk in Adolescent Offending: A Test in Two Urban Samples , 2010 .

[58]  Frank M. Weerman,et al.  PEER SIMILARITY IN DELINQUENCY FOR DIFFERENT TYPES OF FRIENDS: A COMPARISON USING TWO MEASUREMENT METHODS* , 2005 .

[59]  Dana L. Haynie,et al.  Reconsidering Peers and Delinquency: How do Peers Matter? , 2005 .

[60]  H. Stattin,et al.  Leisure activities and adolescent antisocial behavior: the role of structure and social context. , 2000, Journal of adolescence.

[61]  K. Yuan,et al.  Robust mean and covariance structure analysis. , 1998, The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology.

[62]  Elisa M Trucco,et al.  Vulnerability to peer influence: a moderated mediation study of early adolescent alcohol use initiation. , 2011, Addictive behaviors.

[63]  Harold G. Grasmick,et al.  Testing the Core Empirical Implications of Gottfredson and Hirschi's General Theory of Crime , 1993 .

[64]  Jacob T. N. Young,et al.  What do Alternative Measures of Peer Behavior Tell Us? Examining the Discriminant Validity of Multiple Methods of Measuring Peer Deviance and the Implications for Etiological Models , 2015 .

[65]  Fuzhong Li,et al.  Friendships and Violent Behavior During Adolescence , 1997 .

[66]  J. Eccles,et al.  Extracurricular Activities and Adolescent Development , 2003 .

[67]  W. Bernasco,et al.  The space-time budget method in criminological research , 2014 .

[68]  T. Dishion,et al.  Antisocial boys and their friends in early adolescence: relationship characteristics, quality, and interactional process. , 1995, Child development.

[69]  Carter Hay,et al.  SELF-CONTROL THEORY AND THE CONCEPT OF OPPORTUNITY: THE CASE FOR A MORE SYSTEMATIC UNION* , 2008 .

[70]  Jón Gunnar Bernburg,et al.  Routine activities in social context: A closer look at the role of opportunity in deviant behavior , 2001 .