Quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) prediction of (eco)toxicity of short aliphatic protic ionic liquids.

Ionic liquids (ILs) are considered as a group of very promising compounds due to their excellent properties (practical non-volatility, high thermal stability and very good and diverse solving capacity). The ILs have a good prospect of replacing traditional organic solvents in vast variety of applications. However, the complete information on their environmental impact is still not available. There is also an enormous number of possible combinations of anions and cations which can form ILs, the fact that requires a method allowing the prediction of toxicity of existing and potential ILs. In this study, a group contribution QSAR model has been used in order to predict the (eco)toxicity of protic and aprotic ILs for five tests (Microtox®, Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata and Lemna minor growth inhibition test, and Acetylcholinestherase inhibition and Cell viability assay with IPC-81 cells). The predicted and experimental toxicity are well correlated. A prediction of EC50 for these (eco)toxicity tests has also been made for eight representatives of the new family of short aliphatic protic ILs, whose toxicity has not been determined experimentally to date. The QSAR model applied in this study can allow the selection of potentially less toxic ILs amongst the existing ones (e.g. in the case of aprotic ILs), but it can also be very helpful in directing the synthesis efforts toward developing new "greener" ILs respectful with the environment (e.g. short aliphatic protic ILs).

[1]  P. Popelier,et al.  Quantitative structure-activity relationship for toxicity of ionic liquids to Daphnia magna: aromaticity vs. lipophilicity. , 2014, Chemosphere.

[2]  P. Scammells,et al.  Biodegradable ionic liquids Part II. Effect of the anion and toxicology , 2005 .

[3]  S. Stolte,et al.  Lipophilicity parameters for ionic liquid cations and their correlation to in vitro cytotoxicity. , 2007, Ecotoxicology and environmental safety.

[4]  B. Ondruschka,et al.  Effects of ionic liquids on the acetylcholinesterase – a structure–activity relationship consideration , 2004 .

[5]  Bernd Jastorff,et al.  Design of Sustainable Chemical Products — The Example of Ionic Liquids , 2007 .

[6]  Chul-Woong Cho,et al.  Alkyl-chain length effects of imidazolium and pyridinium ionic liquids on photosynthetic response of Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata. , 2008, Journal of bioscience and bioengineering.

[7]  S. Stolte,et al.  Qualitative and quantitative structure activity relationships for the inhibitory effects of cationic head groups, functionalised side chains and anions of ionic liquids on acetylcholinesterase , 2008 .

[8]  S. Stolte,et al.  The influence of anion species on the toxicity of 1-alkyl-3-methylimidazolium ionic liquids observed in an (eco)toxicological test battery , 2007 .

[9]  Višnja Gaurina Srček,et al.  A brief overview of the potential environmental hazards of ionic liquids. , 2014, Ecotoxicology and environmental safety.

[10]  L. Rebelo,et al.  Ionic liquids: a pathway to environmental acceptability. , 2011, Chemical Society reviews.

[11]  S. Stolte,et al.  (Eco)toxicity and biodegradability of selected protic and aprotic ionic liquids. , 2013, Journal of hazardous materials.

[12]  Randall J. Bernot,et al.  Assessing the factors responsible for ionic liquid toxicity to aquatic organisms via quantitative structure–property relationship modeling , 2006 .

[13]  R Aldaco,et al.  A novel group contribution method in the development of a QSAR for predicting the toxicity (Vibrio fischeri EC50) of ionic liquids. , 2007, Ecotoxicology and environmental safety.

[14]  Charles F. Kulpa,et al.  Toxicity and antimicrobial activity of imidazolium and pyridinium ionic liquids , 2005 .

[15]  B. Ondruschka,et al.  Biological effects of imidazolium ionic liquids with varying chain lengths in acute Vibrio fischeri and WST-1 cell viability assays. , 2004, Ecotoxicology and environmental safety.

[16]  S. Stolte,et al.  Effects of Different Head Groups and Functionalized Side Chains on the Cytotoxicity of Ionic Liquids. , 2007 .

[17]  J. Sierra,et al.  A comparative study of the terrestrial ecotoxicity of selected protic and aprotic ionic liquids. , 2014, Chemosphere.

[18]  A. Amberg In Silico Methods , 2006 .

[19]  K. Roy,et al.  Advances in QSPR/QSTR models of ionic liquids for the design of greener solvents of the future , 2013, Molecular Diversity.

[20]  Chul-Woong Cho,et al.  Environmental fate and toxicity of ionic liquids: a review. , 2010, Water research.

[21]  J. Dixon,et al.  Biodegradability of imidazolium and pyridinium ionic liquids by an activated sludge microbial community , 2007, Biodegradation.

[22]  K. Radošević,et al.  In vitro cytotoxicity assessment of imidazolium ionic liquids: biological effects in fish Channel Catfish Ovary (CCO) cell line. , 2013, Ecotoxicology and environmental safety.

[23]  S. Stolte,et al.  PAPER www.rsc.org/greenchem | Green Chemistry Effects , 2007 .

[24]  A. Latała,et al.  Toxicity of imidazolium and pyridinium based ionic liquids towards algae. Chlorella vulgaris, Oocystis submarina (green algae) and Cyclotella meneghiniana, Skeletonema marinoi (diatoms) , 2009 .

[25]  A. Wells,et al.  On the Freshwater Ecotoxicity and Biodegradation Properties of Some Common Ionic Liquids , 2006 .

[26]  S. Mattedi,et al.  (Eco)toxicity and biodegradability of protic ionic liquids. , 2016, Chemosphere.