An insight into linear quarter car model accuracy

The linear quarter car model is the most widely used suspension system model. A number of authors expressed doubts about the accuracy of the linear quarter car model in predicting the movement of a complex nonlinear suspension system. In this investigation, a quarter car rig, designed to mimic the popular MacPherson strut suspension system, is subject to narrowband excitation at a range of frequencies using a motor driven cam. Linear and nonlinear quarter car simulations of the rig are developed. Both isolated and operational testing techniques are used to characterise the individual suspension system components. Simulations carried out using the linear and nonlinear models are compared to measured data from the suspension test rig at selected excitation frequencies. Results show that the linear quarter car model provides a reasonable approximation of unsprung mass acceleration but significantly overpredicts sprung mass acceleration magnitude. The nonlinear simulation, featuring a trilinear shock absorber model and nonlinear tyre, produces results which are significantly more accurate than linear simulation results. The effect of tyre damping on the nonlinear model is also investigated for narrowband excitation. It is found to reduce the magnitude of unsprung mass acceleration peaks and contribute to an overall improvement in simulation accuracy.

[1]  M. F. Golnaraghi,et al.  Root mean square optimization criterion for vibration behaviour of linear quarter car using analytical methods , 2006 .

[2]  Hüseyin Akçay,et al.  Influence of tire damping on the ride performance potential of quarter-car active suspensions , 2008, 2008 47th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[3]  Mehdi Ahmadian,et al.  A Quarter-Car Experimental Analysis of Alternative Semiactive Control Methods , 2000 .

[4]  A.J.C. Schmeitz.  A Semi-Empirical Three-Dimensional Model of the Pneumatic Tyre Rolling over Arbitrarily Uneven Road Surfaces , 2004 .

[5]  David J. Cole,et al.  Performance of a semi-active damper for heavy vehicles , 2000 .

[6]  Massimiliano Gobbi,et al.  On the Testing of Vibration Performances of Road Vehicle Suspensions , 2007 .

[7]  Simon P. Wilson,et al.  The use of Bayesian statistics to predict patterns of spatial repeatability , 2006 .

[8]  Justin David Langdon,et al.  Design and Adaptive Control of a Lab-based, Tire-coupled, Quarter-car Suspension Test Rig for the Accurate Re-creation of Vehicle Response , 2007 .

[9]  R. Majjad.  Estimation of suspension parameters , 1997, Proceedings of the 1997 IEEE International Conference on Control Applications.

[10]  David Griffiths,et al.  Vibration testing and dynamic modeling of automotive shock absorbers , 2000, Smart Structures.

[11]  Jason R. Blough,et al.  The Effects of Different Input Excitation on the Dynamic Characterization of an Automotive Shock Absorber , 2001 .

[12]  L. R. Miller.  Tuning passive, semi-active, and fully active suspension systems , 1988, Proceedings of the 27th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[13]  Atanas A. Popov,et al.  Modelling of vibration damping in pneumatic tyres , 2005 .

[14]  Joel A. Levitt,et al.  The Influence of Tire Damping in Quarter Car Active Suspension Models , 1991 .

[15]  Christopher A. Pare.  Experimental Evaluation of Semiactive Magneto-Rheological Suspensions for Passenger Vehicles , 1998 .

[16]  Costas Papadimitriou,et al.  Design Optimization of Quarter-car Models with Passive and Semi-active Suspensions under Random Road Excitation , 2005 .

[17]  Oliver Nelles,et al.  Modeling and identification of the vehicle suspension characteristics using local linear model trees , 1999, Proceedings of the 1999 IEEE International Conference on Control Applications (Cat. No.99CH36328).

[18]  L.F.P. Etman,et al.  Design of a Stroke Dependent Damper for the Front Axle Suspension of a Truck Using Multibody System Dynamics and Numerical Optimization , 2002 .

[19]  B. Lohmann,et al.  Low order robust controllers for active vehicle suspensions , 2006, 2006 IEEE Conference on Computer Aided Control System Design, 2006 IEEE International Conference on Control Applications, 2006 IEEE International Symposium on Intelligent Control.

[20]  H. Akcay,et al.  Effect of tire damping on the ride performance potential of active suspension systems , 2007, SICE Annual Conference 2007.

[21]  Julius S. Bendat,et al.  Engineering Applications of Correlation and Spectral Analysis , 1980 .

[22]  Nicholas A J Lieven,et al.  Modelling and Dynamic Response of a Damper with Relief Valve , 2005 .

[23]  Paul I. Ro,et al.  Reduced-order modelling and parameter estimation for a quarter-car suspension system , 2000 .

[24]  Georgia Georgiou,et al.  Multi-objective optimization of quarter-car models with a passive or semi-active suspension system , 2007 .

[25]  David Cebon,et al.  EFFECTS OF HEAVY-VEHICLE CHARACTERISTICS ON PAVEMENT RESPONSE AND PERFORMANCE , 1991 .

[26]  Y Delanne,et al.  Road profile input estimation in vehicle dynamics simulation , 2006 .

[27]  Ahmed A. Shabana,et al.  Dynamics of Multibody Systems , 2020 .

[28]  Henri Kowalczyk,et al.  Damper Tuning with the use of a Seven Post Shaker Rig , 2002 .

[29]  Hans B. Pacejka,et al.  Recent advances in tyre models and testing procedures , 2005 .

[30]  O. A. Olatunbosun,et al.  Static Tyre/Road Interaction Modelling , 1997 .

[31]  Michael W. Sayers,et al.  INTERPRETATION OF ROAD ROUGHNESS PROFILE DATA , 1996 .

[32]  David Thompson,et al.  Dynamic stiffness formulation, free vibration and wave motion of helical springs , 2001 .

[33]  Massimiliano Gobbi,et al.  Test Rig for Characterization of Automotive Suspension Systems , 2008 .

[34]  Werner Mack,et al.  Nonparametric Shock Absorber Modelling Based on Standard Test Data , 2002 .

[35]  M. Pennati,et al.  Indoor testing of road vehicle suspensions , 2008 .

[36]  G. Tomlinson,et al.  Nonlinearity in Structural Dynamics: Detection, Identification and Modelling , 2000 .

[37]  G. Mastinu,et al.  Experimental Study and Numerical Modeling of the Dynamic Behaviour of Tyre/Suspension While Running Over an Obstacle , 2006 .

[38]  M. W. Sayers.  Interpretation of road roughness profile data. Final report , 1996 .

[39]  Mehdi Ahmadian,et al.  An experimental analysis of suitability of various semiactive control methods for magneto-rheological vehicle suspensions , 2005, SPIE Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring.

[40]  P.W.A. Zegelaar,et al.  The dynamic response of tyres to brake torque variations and road unevenesses , 1998 .

[41]  Paul I. Ro,et al.  Effect of the suspension structure on equivalent suspension parameters , 1999 .

[42]  Douglas E. Adams,et al.  A time and frequency domain approach for identifying nonlinear mechanical system models in the absence of an input measurement , 2005 .

[43]  Jonathan Daniel Ziegenmeyer.  Estimation of Disturbance Inputs to a Tire Coupled Quarter-car Suspension Test Rig , 2007 .

[44]  David Crolla,et al.  Road Vehicle Suspension System Design - a review , 1987 .

[45]  Z. Abduljabbar,et al.  LINEAR QUADRATIC GAUSSIAN CONTROL OF A QUARTER-CAR SUSPENSION , 1999 .

[46]  Keith Worden,et al.  Nonlinearity in Structural Dynamics , 2019 .

[47]  Keith Worden,et al.  Nonlinear system identification of automotive dampers: A time and frequency-domain analysis , 2009 .

[48]  Stefaan W.R. Duym,et al.  EVALUATION OF SHOCK ABSORBER MODELS , 1997 .

[49]  Semiha Turkay,et al.  A Study of Random Vibration Characteristics of the Quarter-Car Model , 2004 .

[50]  Werner Schiehlen,et al.  Spectral simulation and shock absorber identification , 2003 .