Impact of Glutathione Modulation on Stability and Pharmacokinetic Profile of Redox-Sensitive Nanogels.

Nanoparticles degradable upon external stimuli combine pharmacokinetic features of both small molecules as well as large nanoparticles. However, despite promising preclinical results, several redox responsive disulphide-linked nanoparticles failed in clinical translation, mainly due to their unexpected in vivo behavior. Glutathione (GSH) is one of the most evaluated antioxidants responsible for disulfide degradation. Herein, the impact of GSH on the in vivo behavior of redox-sensitive nanogels under physiological and modulated conditions is investigated. Labelling of nanogels with a DNA-intercalating dye and a radioisotope allows visualization of the redox responsiveness at the cellular and the systemic levels, respectively. In vitro, efficient cleavage of disulphide bonds of nanogels is achieved by manipulation of intracellular GSH concentration. While in vivo, the redox-sensitive nanogels undergo, to a certain extent, premature degradation in circulation leading to rapid renal elimination. This instability is modulated by transient inhibition of GSH synthesis with buthioninsulfoximin. Altered GSH concentration significantly changes the in vivo pharmacokinetics. Lower GSH results in higher elimination half-life and altered biodistribution of the nanogels with a different metabolite profile. These data provide strong evidence that decreased nanogel degradation in blood circulation can limit the risk of premature drug release and enhance circulation half-life of the nanogel.

[1]  Ru Cheng,et al.  Reduction-sensitive degradable micellar nanoparticles as smart and intuitive delivery systems for cancer chemotherapy , 2013, Expert opinion on drug delivery.

[2]  P. Ghezzi,et al.  Thiol-disulfide balance: from the concept of oxidative stress to that of redox regulation. , 2005, Antioxidants & redox signaling.

[3]  Dean P. Jones,et al.  Redox compartmentalization in eukaryotic cells. , 2008, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[4]  Hang Zhou,et al.  pH and Glutathione Dual-Responsive Dynamic Cross-Linked Supramolecular Network on Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles for Controlled Anticancer Drug Release. , 2015, ACS applied materials & interfaces.

[5]  Qiang He,et al.  Stem Cell Membrane-Coated Nanogels for Highly Efficient In Vivo Tumor Targeted Drug Delivery. , 2016, Small.

[6]  D. Berry,et al.  Failure of higher-dose paclitaxel to improve outcome in patients with metastatic breast cancer: cancer and leukemia group B trial 9342. , 2004, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[7]  Jie Zheng,et al.  Clearance Pathways and Tumor Targeting of Imaging Nanoparticles. , 2015, ACS nano.

[8]  W. Degraff,et al.  Selective modulation of glutathione levels in human normal versus tumor cells and subsequent differential response to chemotherapy drugs. , 1986, Cancer research.

[9]  Sílvia A. Ferreira,et al.  Unraveling the uptake mechanisms of mannan nanogel in bone-marrow-derived macrophages. , 2012, Macromolecular bioscience.

[10]  P. O'dwyer,et al.  Clinical studies of reversal of drug resistance based on glutathione. , 1998, Chemico-biological interactions.

[11]  J. Oh,et al.  Intracellular drug delivery nanocarriers of glutathione-responsive degradable block copolymers having pendant disulfide linkages. , 2013, Biomacromolecules.

[12]  R. Jain,et al.  Delivering nanomedicine to solid tumors , 2010, Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology.

[13]  G. Evan,et al.  Proliferation, cell cycle and apoptosis in cancer , 2001, Nature.

[14]  Yanli Zhao,et al.  Redox and pH Dual Responsive Polymer Based Nanoparticles for In Vivo Drug Delivery. , 2017, Small.

[15]  Jean-Christophe Leroux,et al.  Disulfide-containing parenteral delivery systems and their redox-biological fate. , 2014, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[16]  Y. Liu,et al.  Multifunctional Hybrid Nanoparticles for Traceable Drug Delivery and Intracellular Microenvironment-Controlled Multistage Drug-Release in Neurons. , 2017, Small.

[17]  M. Möller,et al.  Mild oxidation of thiofunctional polymers to cytocompatible and stimuli-sensitive hydrogels and nanogels. , 2013, Macromolecular bioscience.

[18]  M. H. Irwin,et al.  Astrocyte Growth, Reactivity, and the Target of the Antiproliferative Antibody, TAPA , 1996, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[19]  Ying Li,et al.  Dual redox responsive assemblies formed from diselenide block copolymers. , 2010, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[20]  Jia Guo,et al.  Redox/pH dual stimuli-responsive biodegradable nanohydrogels with varying responses to dithiothreitol and glutathione for controlled drug release. , 2012, Biomaterials.

[21]  Kristina M. Cook,et al.  Control of blood proteins by functional disulfide bonds. , 2014, Blood.

[22]  S. D. De Smedt,et al.  Crucial factors and emerging concepts in ultrasound-triggered drug delivery. , 2012, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[23]  Shelly C. Lu Regulation of hepatic glutathione synthesis: current concepts and controversies , 1999, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[24]  I. Bernstein,et al.  Antibody-targeted chemotherapy of older patients with acute myeloid leukemia in first relapse using Mylotarg (gemtuzumab ozogamicin) , 2002, Leukemia.

[25]  F. Mottaghy,et al.  Radiolabeled nanogels for nuclear molecular imaging. , 2013, Macromolecular rapid communications.

[26]  W. Hennink,et al.  Reduction-sensitive polymers and bioconjugates for biomedical applications. , 2009, Biomaterials.

[27]  Sudha Kumari,et al.  Endocytosis unplugged: multiple ways to enter the cell , 2010, Cell Research.

[28]  P. Choyke,et al.  Clearance properties of nano-sized particles and molecules as imaging agents: considerations and caveats. , 2008, Nanomedicine.

[29]  M. Stenzel,et al.  Acid-degradable polymers for drug delivery: a decade of innovation. , 2013, Chemical communications.

[30]  L. Lyon,et al.  Microgel translocation through pores under confinement. , 2010, Angewandte Chemie.

[31]  P. Cresswell,et al.  Enzymatic reduction of disulfide bonds in lysosomes: characterization of a gamma-interferon-inducible lysosomal thiol reductase (GILT). , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[32]  Jin-Zhi Du,et al.  Synthesis and micellization of amphiphilic brush-coil block copolymer based on poly(epsilon-caprolactone) and PEGylated polyphosphoester. , 2006, Biomacromolecules.

[33]  M. Uesaka,et al.  In vitro characterization of cells derived from chordoma cell line U-CH1 following treatment with X-rays, heavy ions and chemotherapeutic drugs , 2011, Radiation oncology.

[34]  Zhiyuan Zhong,et al.  Glutathione-responsive nano-vehicles as a promising platform for targeted intracellular drug and gene delivery. , 2011, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[35]  Subra Suresh,et al.  Size‐Dependent Endocytosis of Nanoparticles , 2009, Advanced materials.

[36]  Patrick Couvreur,et al.  Stimuli-responsive nanocarriers for drug delivery. , 2013, Nature materials.

[37]  J. Fréchet,et al.  A new approach towards acid sensitive copolymer micelles for drug delivery. , 2003, Chemical communications.

[38]  F. Mottaghy,et al.  Multistage Passive and Active Delivery of Radiolabeled Nanogels for Superior Tumor Penetration Efficiency. , 2017, Biomacromolecules.

[39]  A. Göpferich,et al.  Delivery of Nucleic Acids via Disulfide‐Based Carrier Systems , 2009, Advanced materials.

[40]  Y. Barenholz Doxil®--the first FDA-approved nano-drug: lessons learned. , 2012, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[41]  Zhiguang Wu,et al.  Polymeric capsule-cushioned leukocyte cell membrane vesicles as a biomimetic delivery platform. , 2016, Nanoscale.