Effect of Full-Span Gurney Flap Height on Wing Wake Vortex Alleviation

T HE hazard posed by wake vortices trailing behind heavy airplanes to following aircraft has beenwell known, and the area has been researched to considerable depth since the introduction of the first jumbo jets in the early 1970s. The reader is referred to [1] for an outstanding review of the subject area. The present author has been active in this area since the early 1990s. Gurney flap is an aerodynamic concept that dates back to the 1970s. It represents a long and narrow plate placed at a wing’s trailing edge on its pressure side and perpendicular to it. It was first proposed and utilized quite successfully byDanGurney as a means to increase the downforce on his racing cars. The concept has received some attention in the aerospace community; see, for example, [2–12], with rather limited implementation in actual airplanewing design. For a rather extensive review ofGurneyflap-related research the reader is referred to [13]. It will be stated here only that the flap regularly increases both the wing’s lift and drag and decreases its aerodynamic efficiency. The major effect of this modification is an increased circulation at the wing trailing edge. Since early 2004 the author has been studying the potential use of Gurney flaps for wake vortex alleviation. First, a Gurney flap having a height equal to 6% of the wing chord was studied. Several flow visualization techniqueswere used to qualitatively compare the nearfield wake flows behind a baseline wing vs a Gurney flap equipped wing [13]. A new quantitative description of the vortex strength, a roll-up tightness factor (RTF) was proposed and used. It was found that the flap indeed affected the near-field wing wake to a significant degree [14]. Next, an additional Gurney flap, one having a height equal to 1.5% of the wing chord, i.e., 0:015c, was investigated [15]. The results followed the trends presented in [13,14] quite well. To further expand the investigation matrix, an intermediate-height Gurney flap, one with a height equal to 0:04c, has been examined recently. Once again, both the effects on the aerodynamic characteristics of the configurations and their respective vortex strengths have been recorded and analyzed. A discussion of these results is presented in the next sections.

[1]  Vojin R. Nikolic,et al.  Two aspects of the use of full-and partial-span Gurney flaps , 2007 .

[2]  Lawrence Lee,et al.  Effect of Gurney Flap on Unsteady Wake Vortex , 2007 .

[3]  Vojin R. Nikolic,et al.  Trailing vortex rollup from a wing equipped with a gurney flap , 2006 .

[4]  V. Nikolic Investigation of Possible Merit of Gurney Flap as Wake Vortex-Attenuation Device , 2005 .

[5]  Eric J. Jumper,et al.  First Look into Effects of Discrete Midspan Vortex Injection on Wing Performance , 2004 .

[6]  Jinjun Wang,et al.  Influences of Mounting Angles and Locations on the Effects of Gurney Flaps , 2003 .

[7]  Jinjun Wang,et al.  Experimental Studies on the Drag Reduction and Lift Enhancement of a Delta Wing , 2003 .

[8]  Sudhir L. Gai,et al.  Influence of Trailing-Edge Flow Control on Airfoil Performance , 2003 .

[9]  Jin Tso,et al.  Lift Augmentation on Delta Wing with Leading-Edge Fences and Gurney Flap , 2000 .

[10]  David W. Hurst,et al.  Aerodynamics of Gurney Flaps on a Single-Element High-Lift Wing , 2000 .

[11]  Vernon J. Rossow,et al.  Lift-generated vortex wakes of subsonic transport aircraft , 1999 .

[12]  C. P. van Dam,et al.  Gurney Flap Experiments on Airfoil and Wings , 1999 .

[13]  Roy Y. Myose,et al.  Gurney Flap Experiments on Airfoils, Wings, and Reflection Plane Model , 1998 .

[14]  Bruce L. Storms,et al.  Lift enhancement of an airfoil using a Gurney flap and vortex generators , 1993 .

[15]  Joseph Katz,et al.  Effect of 90 Degree Flap on the Aerodynamics of a Two-Element Airfoil , 1989 .

[16]  R. Liebeck,et al.  On the design of subsonic airfoils for high lift , 1976 .

[17]  William H. Rae,et al.  Low-Speed Wind Tunnel Testing , 1966 .