Water Resource Vulnerability Characteristics by District’s Population Size in a Changing Climate Using Subjective and Objective Weights

The goal of this study is to derive water resource vulnerability characteristics for South Korea according to individual district populations in a changing climate. The definition of water resource vulnerability in this study consists of potential flood damage and potential water scarcity. To quantify these vulnerabilities, key factors, or indicators affecting vulnerability, are integrated with a technique for order of preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS), which is a multi-criteria decision-making approach to determine the optimal alternative by considering both the best and worst solutions. The weight for each indicator is determined based on both the Delphi technique and Shannon’s entropy, which are employed to reduce the uncertainty in the process of determining the weights. The Delphi technique reflects expert opinions, and Shannon’s entropy reflects the uncertainty of the performance data. Under A1B climate change scenarios, medium-sized districts (200,000–300,000 inhabitants) are the most vulnerable regarding potential flood damage; the largest districts (exceeding 500,000 inhabitants) are found to be the most vulnerable with respect to potential water scarcity. This result indicates that the local governments of cities or districts with more than 200,000 inhabitants should implement better preventative measures for water resources. In addition, the Delphi and entropy methods show the same rankings for flood vulnerability; however, these approaches produce slightly different rankings regarding water scarcity vulnerability. Therefore, it is suggested that rankings from not only subjective but also objective weights should be considered in making a final decision to implement specific adaptive measures to climate change.

[1]  I. Hendry The Delphi method: Techniques and applications Edited by H. A. Linstone and M. Turoff. Pp. xx + 620. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Advanced Book Program, Reading, Massachusetts. 1975. US $29.50; US $16.50 paper , 1976 .

[2]  Ching-Lai Hwang,et al.  Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications - A State-of-the-Art Survey , 1981, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems.

[3]  Brian W. Mar,et al.  The Delphi technique in environmental assessment. I: Implementation and effectiveness , 1985 .

[4]  T. Stewart A CRITICAL SURVEY ON THE STATUS OF MULTIPLE CRITERIA DECISION MAKING THEORY AND PRACTICE , 1992 .

[5]  M. Adler,et al.  Gazing into the oracle : the Delphi method and its application to social policy and public health , 1996 .

[6]  George Wright,et al.  The Delphi technique as a forecasting tool: issues and analysis , 1999 .

[7]  W. Adger,et al.  THEORY AND PRACTICE IN ASSESSING VULNERABILITY TO CLIMATE CHANGE AND FACILITATING ADAPTATION , 2000 .

[8]  Keith Beven,et al.  Flood frequency estimation by continuous simulation under climate change (with uncertainty) , 2000 .

[9]  W. Adger,et al.  Theory and Practice in Assessing Vulnerability to Climate Change andFacilitating Adaptation , 2000 .

[10]  C. Vörösmarty,et al.  Global water resources: vulnerability from climate change and population growth. , 2000, Science.

[11]  Keith Beven,et al.  Flood frequency estimation under climate change (with uncertainty). , 2000 .

[12]  J. Seager,et al.  Perspectives and limitations of indicators in water management , 2001 .

[13]  Christel Prudhomme,et al.  Uncertainty and climate change impact on the flood regime of small UK catchments , 2003 .

[14]  R. Kasperson,et al.  A framework for vulnerability analysis in sustainability science , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[15]  Sang Joon Kim,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Communication , 2006 .

[16]  N. Arnell,et al.  Adapting to climate change: Public water supply in England and Wales , 2006 .

[17]  Eun-Sung Chung,et al.  Development of integrated watershed management schemes for an intensively urbanized region in Korea , 2007 .

[18]  Bin Zhang,et al.  Application of Entropy Weight Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation in Optimal Selection of Engineering Machinery , 2008, 2008 ISECS International Colloquium on Computing, Communication, Control, and Management.

[19]  Marion W. Jenkins,et al.  Adaptability and adaptations of California’s water supply system to dry climate warming , 2008 .

[20]  Eun-Sung Chung,et al.  Identification of Spatial Ranking of Hydrological Vulnerability Using Multi-Criteria Decision Making Techniques: Case Study of Korea , 2009 .

[21]  Barry Turner,et al.  United Nations (UN) , 2009 .

[22]  Alison L. Kay,et al.  Comparison of uncertainty sources for climate change impacts: flood frequency in England , 2009 .

[23]  Mohamed A. Hamouda,et al.  Vulnerability Assessment of Water Resources Systems in the Eastern Nile Basin , 2009 .

[24]  M. Babel,et al.  Vulnerability of freshwater resources in large and medium Nepalese river basins to environmental change. , 2010, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[25]  Chang-Hoi Ho,et al.  Assessment of the changes in extreme vulnerability over East Asia due to global warming , 2012, Climatic Change.

[26]  J. Hinkel “Indicators of vulnerability and adaptive capacity”: Towards a clarification of the science–policy interface , 2011 .

[27]  Suk-Jo Lee,et al.  A projection of extreme climate events in the 21st century over east Asia using the community climate system model 3 , 2011 .

[28]  Qiong Li,et al.  Research on flood risk analysis and evaluation method based on variable fuzzy sets and information diffusion , 2012 .

[29]  Carlo Giupponi,et al.  Climate Change Adaptation and Vulnerability Assessment of Water Resources Systems in Developing Countries: A Generalized Framework and a Feasibility Study in Bangladesh , 2012 .

[30]  J. Padowski,et al.  Water availability and vulnerability of 225 large cities in the United States , 2012 .

[31]  Eun-Sung Chung,et al.  A fuzzy multi-criteria approach to flood risk vulnerability in South Korea by considering climate change impacts , 2013, Expert Syst. Appl..

[32]  Eun-Sung Chung,et al.  Fuzzy VIKOR approach for assessing the vulnerability of the water supply to climate change and variability in South Korea , 2013 .

[33]  Fei Ye,et al.  An extended TOPSIS model based on the Possibility theory under fuzzy environment , 2014, Knowl. Based Syst..

[34]  Eun-Sung Chung,et al.  An index-based robust decision making framework for watershed management in a changing climate. , 2014, The Science of the total environment.